Given the title:
It's Time to Call for New Black Leadership
We Need You
by Thulani Davis
February 18 - 24, 2004
…it's safe to assume I have an opinion. Being a bit on the long side, I'll have to get back to the article a bit later. Meanwhile…
Sharpton wanted to be the next Jesse Jackson, and Jesse Jackson wanted to be the next Martin Luther King Jr. Jesse Jackson Jr. probably also wants to be the next Jesse. Carol Moseley Braun was pegged the next Shirley Chisholm, whose chief significance as a black candidate is that she was the first. There are quite a few neo-Malcolms like Cornel West among the over-40 set, and Henry Louis Gates is out to be the new W.E.B. DuBois, but a televised one. Louis Farrakhan wanted to be the new Elijah Muhammad, and Chavis Muhammad looks to be grooming himself to be a new, kinder, gentler Farrakhan with sartorial touches from his hip-hop mogul boss, Russell Simmons.
At the margins we have the "new" Black Panthers and an array of Muslim sects ranging from progressive to regressive. Most of the remaining prominent black (and yes, male) voices out there "representing," such as Kweisi Mfume and Randall Robinson, give you a Malcolm-Martin stylistic mix. (No neo-Baldwins or -Rustins in this crew.)
We are way overdue for a change in black leadership—a few 21st-century originals or, better yet, many of them. We need young people with ideas who aren't just out to dine at Gallagher's with Roger Stone or make headlines by stripping in public. Does one have to say that the answer won't come from the cold warrior Condoleezza Rice or General Colin Powell, now tainted as an apologist for missing weapons of mass destruction?
Maybe the problem is that black people haven't realized that they need leaders, and that black is an unnecessary ancillary to that.
Posted by Phelps at February 18, 2004 11:32 AMChange it to personal levels, advocacy leadership, as opposed to organizational.
Groups always form, part of the social context. Making indiviuals find where they stand and define what is of merit is the first step.
The reinforcement of assumption is much of Sharpton's campaign, his right wing backing is reverse advertising.
Not to say he does not make good points in debate. But that a black leader has to be a preacher or politician isnt new. The demographic of success at personal levels is what leverages true advances.
The idea of leadership being something inherent and not specific is valid phelps, leadership should transcend one group or demographic. For people to make it personal or apply it is another story though.
And modern culture of marketing does not encourage otherwise. Inherently flawed socieatl precept, or something which can be changed over time?