Do not make the mistake of thinking that because my conclusion is the same as another person's that my reasoning is the same
A Good Cause or Two
nbuf_button.gif bootbush.jpg
Click for more info

The Best of P6
The Racism Series The Reparations Series Installing a negro in your head Identity Blogging Where We Stand The LimbaughDiscussion That has Nothing To Do With Limbaugh
Updated when I write something really cool

Search
Local Links
The Attack on Civil Rights Corporate Influence on Government The Development of Race Basic Laws of Human Stupidity Blogger Archives
EMAIL ME AT
email.gif
Blogroll Me!
Blog-related mail may be published

The Public Library
The Black Experience in America The Souls of Black Folks My Bondage and My Freedom The Martin Luther King Jr. Collection Walker's AppealThe Shaping of Black America, Ch. 3
Updated as frequently as possible

Archives
May 16, 2004 - May 22, 2004 May 09, 2004 - May 15, 2004 May 02, 2004 - May 08, 2004 April 25, 2004 - May 01, 2004 April 18, 2004 - April 24, 2004 April 11, 2004 - April 17, 2004 April 04, 2004 - April 10, 2004 March 28, 2004 - April 03, 2004 March 21, 2004 - March 27, 2004 March 14, 2004 - March 20, 2004 March 07, 2004 - March 13, 2004 February 29, 2004 - March 06, 2004 February 22, 2004 - February 28, 2004 February 15, 2004 - February 21, 2004 February 08, 2004 - February 14, 2004 February 01, 2004 - February 07, 2004 January 25, 2004 - January 31, 2004 January 18, 2004 - January 24, 2004 January 11, 2004 - January 17, 2004 January 11, 2004 - January 17, 2004January 04, 2004 - January 10, 2004December 28, 2003 - January 03, 2004December 21, 2003 - December 27, 2003December 14, 2003 - December 20, 2003December 07, 2003 - December 13, 2003November 30, 2003 - December 06, 2003November 23, 2003 - November 29, 2003November 16, 2003 - November 22, 2003November 09, 2003 - November 15, 2003November 02, 2003 - November 08, 2003October 26, 2003 - November 01, 2003October 19, 2003 - October 25, 2003October 12, 2003 - October 18, 2003October 05, 2003 - October 11, 2003September 28, 2003 - October 04, 2003September 21, 2003 - September 27, 2003September 14, 2003 - September 20, 2003September 07, 2003 - September 13, 2003August 31, 2003 - September 06, 2003August 24, 2003 - August 30, 2003August 17, 2003 - August 23, 2003August 10, 2003 - August 16, 2003August 03, 2003 - August 09, 2003 July 27, 2003 - August 02, 2003 July 20, 2003 - July 26, 2003 July 13, 2003 - July 19, 2003 July 06, 2003 - July 12, 2003 June 29, 2003 - July 05, 2003 June 22, 2003 - June 28, 2003 June 15, 2003 - June 21, 2003 June 08, 2003 - June 14, 2003 June 01, 2003 - June 07, 2003 May 25, 2003 - May 31, 2003 May 18, 2003 - May 24, 2003 May 11, 2003 - May 17, 2003 May 04, 2003 - May 10, 2003 April 27, 2003 - May 03, 2003 April 20, 2003 - April 26, 2003 April 13, 2003 - April 19, 2003 April 06, 2003 - April 12, 2003
« Thaks a lot, Greenspan | Main | What did YOU get from Bush? »

May 16, 2004
You just now realizing this? 

From GOP, Zero Tolerance For Democratic War Critics
By Charles Babington
Sunday, May 16, 2004; Page A05

Republicans have adopted a scorched-earth strategy toward Democrats who challenge the wisdom of the way the war in Iraq is being conducted. Such critics, GOP officials say, are not merely misguided but are craven cut-and-runners who help the enemy and put politics ahead of U.S. troops' safety.

Democrats say the Republicans are twisting facts and trying to stifle debate through intimidation. Not so, say the Republicans, who insist they are not questioning Democrats' patriotism, only their judgment and resolve. If accuracy and nuance sometimes fall victim to all this rhetoric, well, there's a war on, folks.

The ruckus began May 6, when Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) -- a hawkish, longtime defender of the Pentagon -- told reporters he believed the war in Iraq could not be won without sending in significantly more troops and equipment, which he advocated. "Our failure to surge in terms of troop level and resources needed to prevail in this war" has resulted in "what appear to be unattainable goals in our current path," Murtha said at the news conference, hosted by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

House Republicans responded within minutes. "This morning, in a calculated and craven political stunt, the national Democrat Party declared its surrender in the war on terror," said Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.). "Out of sheer, brazen partisanship," House Democrats have "undermined our troops." Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Tex.) said Democrats "are basically giving aid and comfort to our enemies."

Reporters pointed out that Murtha has consistently said the war was unsustainable only under the current policies, and that he urged massive troop buildups as a remedy. DeLay was unmoved. "If you don't give solutions," he said, "that is saying, 'Cut and run.'



Posted by P6 at May 16, 2004 12:02 PM
Trackback URL: http://www.niggerati.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1847
Comments

DeLay's commment was unfair, partisan rhetoric - but that's part and parcel of Congress.

Democrats very successfully demagogued Republicans over Social Security/Medicare in a similar manner from about 1980-2004 to the point where it it is now extremely difficult to even propose modest and beneficial reforms or even have an intelligent discussion on the issue.

Does that make it right ? No, however in politics you need to be very careful about any campaign tactic you initiate because eventually, inevitably, it will come back to zing you. Democrats are getting zinged right now on the war because there is a grain of truth to the criticism - just like there was always a grain of truth in Democratic charges on SS/medicare.

Posted by mark safranski at May 16, 2004 12:30 PM 

Which charge is there a grain of truth to? Treason? (giving aid and comfort to the enemy)? Being calulating and craven?

Nevermind that last one, that's just politics.

Thing is, there's demagoging and then there's demagoging. I don't remember any Democrats accusing Republicans of treason and as you may have noticed I have a startlingly good memory.

The fact is, what the Demoractic folks in Congress are saying about this international debacle is not a grain of truth but the simple truth. One that can't be denied. And THAT is why the Repuglicans (like DeLay) aren't trying to deny it, and why Republicans (like McCain) don't join them in their sliming.

Posted by P6 at May 16, 2004 02:35 PM 

"Thing is, there's demagoging and then there's demagoging."

And there's special-pleading as well ;o)

All politicians must be, if they are to be successful ones, calculating. Craveness is optional but all too common.

Actually, I hear the " treason " charge regularly being aimed at Bush over on Kevin Drum's comment boards- and if I'm not mistaken I recall impeachment articles being filed against Bush I over the Gulf War by Henry Gonzalez ( D-Tx.)

The point being that each party has it's partisan equivalents of hockey goons, it's corrupt pols, high minded statesmen and one-issue ideologues. In terms of functionality they operate in more or less the same fashion to serve differing constituencies with different philosophical premises.

You can try to make a case that behaviorally one party is " worse " than the other but it's not true except for the finite example you chose to select and becomes less true as you increase the time frame or widen the field of comparison. You say treason charges are reprehensible ? I say the 2000 commercials implying Bush was responsible for the dragging death of Byrd are beyond the pale.

Overall, despite ideological polarization, both parties are relatively cleaner, less corrupt, more transparent and more small "d" democratic than they ever have been. You only have to go back to the late 1960's and early 70's to be in the era where politicians took campaign donations in the form of briefcases full of cash from secretive billionaires.

Posted by mark safranski at May 17, 2004 12:49 AM 
Actually, I hear the " treason " charge regularly being aimed at Bush over on Kevin Drum's comment boards

Hell, at least we have a reason. If Bush had merely gotten some head instead of sinking us into this Middle East madness, he'd have my full support.

I say the 2000 commercials implying Bush was responsible for the dragging death of Byrd are beyond the pale.

Yeah, in this particular case, I'd say the problem was more Texas than Bush.

Overall, despite ideological polarization, both parties are relatively cleaner, less corrupt, more transparent and more small "d" democratic than they ever have been.

True, but the Republican ideology is dangerous since the neocons took over.

You only have to go back to the late 1960's and early 70's to be in the era where politicians took campaign donations in the form of briefcases full of cash from secretive billionaires.

Here you're wrong. You don't have to go back more than four years.

Posted by P6 at May 17, 2004 12:00 PM 

Well there's a difference between the FEC regulations and declared contributions, however byzantine and the hijinks documented by Robert Caro in his LBJ trilogy or Stanley Kutler's books on Nixon when it was literally grocery bags full of cash from unknown sources. Or organized crime participation in union and/or local politics. It was a different era.

Posted by mark safranski at May 17, 2004 04:13 PM 

Different era. Okay. I judge pre-Civil War folks by different standards than current ones so I can get with that.

Judging by the standards of this era, Republicans suck. The whole bit of preventing Democratic senators from even reading the bills they have to vote on is extarordinarily manipulative and foul. Not to mention stupid for the very reasons you cite above.

Posted by P6 at May 17, 2004 04:31 PM 
Post a comment









Remember personal info?