He not only has an agenda that causes him to misquote folks, he's sensitive about it being pointed out, too. And runs the same nonsense "ad hominem" defense (while accusing me of the same; at least I don't deny it) that Joe Taylor tried so valiantly.
My comment on his site:
Glad you provided the links.Now if you can explain why you quoted the Times in such a way as to twist the entire intent of their editorial in a way that DOESN'T show your intent is incompatible with honesty I will be truly impress. Will even post it verbatim on my site with no comment.
I'll probably be judged illiterate for the lack of conjugation ("impress").