Professor DeLong is discussing Professor Timothy White, an expert on African plains apes whom I've never heard of…but that's like the fifth time I've written that in the last week, so it's obviously not a negative mark on his professional reputation.
Sometimes something I'm reading brings me to a screeching halt, and it's not always predictable. When I read:
I startled myself with the thought, "What makes you think we ever did?"
But that has nothing to do with my long held suspicion. We humans glorified our ancestors as the great hunter apes when I was young, and that made as much sense to me as Tyranosaurus Rex being a great hunter. Those atrophied arms made it more likely that the beast was a scavenger (as a palentologist once said on PBS, you try catching a chicken with your mouth). Human behavior always struck me more like that of a scavenger and hoarder than a hunter.
Lo, in response to the question unanswered question came this:
Gutsy? Yeah…and far more in keeping with my view of humanity.
Posted by P6 at September 16, 2003 09:22 PM | Trackback URL: http://www.prometheus6.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1674Actually, there is an overwhelming amount of archaeological evidence to support the claim that from at least 500,000 years ago, we were primarily hunters rather than scavengers, and hunters of big game to boot.
The same is even more true of the Neandertals we ended up outcompeting; they seem to have eaten nothing but meat. We know this not just from the tools they used and the camps they left behind, but also from the wear patterns on their teeth and the chemical composition of their bones.
"Man the big-game hunter" may not have been true 1.8 million years ago, but it has certainly been true for a very long time now.
That's it, take all the fun out. :-)
I know that's true. We've been great hunters within recorded history. And of course hunters sometimes scavenge, and vice versa.
But I seriously believe the scavenger traits outweigh the hunter traits in humans.