firehand

Prometheus 6   

Do not make the mistake of thinking that because my conclusion is the same as another person's that my reasoning is the same

October 15, 2003

 

An interesting view from a Kucinich supporter

via Candicissima at Kitty Power. I'm seriously tempted to post the whole article.
The Fire This Time:
Why Kucinich May be the Right Guy at the Right Time
Daniel Patrick Welch

…The Emerging Democratic Majority is ours--but we have the power to blow it by convincing future generations of Blacks, Latinos, Asians, and others that their growing numbers are not of interest to us and they have nothing to gain by participating. The right is quite justifiably following a smart strategy which is the only way they can win. They have even succeeded in getting most Democrats to follow a strategy which is the only way they can lose.

The last insurgent populist campaign the Democrats dispensed with was Jesse Jackson's, and his math is still sound. Consider this equation from his 1984 convention speech (still a great read-isn't it amazing what you can find online?):

If Blacks vote in great numbers, progressive Whites win. It's the only way progressive Whites win. If Blacks vote in great numbers, Hispanics win. When Blacks, Hispanics, and progressive Whites vote, women win. When women win, children win. When women and children win, workers win. We must all come up together. We must come up together.

Those who think that campaign never set off alarm bells in the halls of power need only remember the Newsweek cover four years later, when Jackson managed to break 50% in the Michigan primary by mobilizing tens of thousands of African American youths to vote in their first electoral experience. Somebody found a fairly scary close-up of Jackson in the throes of an intense speech, face contorted and sweaty in a way reminiscent of Hitler or Sun Yung Moon. The one-word caption, in large-type yellow letters, served as headline, heads-up, and horrified call-to-arms: Jesse?! It was apparently the moment when the establishment, although still dismissive, actually considered that he might win, and began to contemplate what it might mean.

The math, stripped of its eloquence, looks something like this: If minority constituencies could be inspired to vote in proportionate numbers and in line with their historical preferences, a populist candidate would need less than 40% of the white vote to constitute a majority. In other words, in a 100 million vote election, 12% Black at 90%, 12 Latino at 65%, Asian at 60%, White Women at 53%...leads to only 25% of white men needed�. Before you get out your calculators, remember this is only a rough sketch. The theory is that by truly energizing the progressive base, we can further effect this shift to the left.

The problem, of course, is that Kucinich isn't Black, and it remains to be seen whether he could mobilize the necessary base constituencies in sufficient numbers. Jackson had a special charisma, which Sharpton and Braun seem to lack in the same quantity. It may not only be about race, though white progressives have been saying this for generations. The difference is that the African American community still has a cohesive political consciousness: Black voters enticed to vote can largely be relied on to support progressive causes. The same can not be said for the alienated white votership, who occasionally sneak out in record numbers to vote for David Duke or worse.

And these tendencies aren't changing, much as we are led to believe otherwise. For one thing, the right would not be pouring money into vote suppression if they were.

Posted by P6 at October 15, 2003 07:04 PM | Trackback URL: http://www.prometheus6.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1989
Comments

Sorry, but I think this is crazy. It isn't just that Kucinich is "not Black." It's that Kucinich has a documented history of engaging in race baiting if it would help his career. I know that was a long time ago, but excuse me for thinking it is major-league presumptuous to assume that because he claims to be the furthest-left guy in the race he should get the votes of people of color.

And besides, if the point is that supposedly unelectable people should be taken seriously, then why not go with Carol Moseley Braun, who at least doesn't make me wonder about whether she is really down with people of color.


Posted by at October 15, 2003 07:15 PM 

Speaking for the broad right in this country that considers itself at least vaguely Republican, is there anything I can do to help the Democrats adopt this strategy ?


Posted by at October 15, 2003 07:26 PM 

No, Mark. You actually can't.


Posted by at October 15, 2003 08:27 PM 

Luis:

I did say interesting, didn't I?


Posted by at October 15, 2003 08:31 PM 

Yeah, I'm not knocking you. Better to be provocative than boring.


Posted by at October 15, 2003 08:48 PM 

Does anybody have any insight into what John Conyers and other African-Americans who work closely with Kucinich in Congress think about whether he's a "race-baiter"? Could anybody please point me to anything more recent than 25 and 30 year old articles? I am serious. It may be that I'm stupid or out of touch but I haven't seen any evidence of racism in how Kucinich acts or in what he says and so I'd like to know why you feel the way you do about him.


Posted by at October 15, 2003 11:27 PM 

It's old stuff that he renounced, is what I hear. Luis acknowledged that as well.

I can tell you it would be possible to build a successful attack on a Kucinich appeal to minorities based on that 30 year old stuff, though.


Posted by at October 15, 2003 11:46 PM 

To me it comes down to this. Kucinich can't change how he was born and raised. He can change how he acts. And he has. That's the most that I think can be asked of anyone.

I'm curious who, other than Republicans, wishes to attack Kucinich like this and why.


Posted by at October 16, 2003 12:53 PM 

Who would attack him this way? Who is he competing with?

Why? Because they're in competition.


Posted by at October 16, 2003 01:09 PM 

Good point. I thought they had dismissed him as not being serious competion but apparently I was wrong :-)


Posted by at October 16, 2003 01:52 PM 
Post a comment
WARNING:I have no problems altering your message to something personally embarrassing if you're rude









Remember personal info?