Do not make the mistake of thinking that because my conclusion is the same as another person's that my reasoning is the same
Dana Blankenhorn at Moore's Lore:
Now I know why. The whole thing was a scam. This was not a publication, and it was not a think tank. It was a bunch of right-wing hacks for hire to anyone who would pay. They would provide cover for whatever lies the client wanted to spout, for a fee, and provide full deniability.
"They would provide cover for whatever lies the client wanted to spout, for a fee, and provide full deniability."
Guilt by association because neither he nor anyone else has provided evidence of articles which provided 'whatever lies the client wanted to spout, for a fee...'
Glad to know I can now say that all anti-war protestors were really Communist or Communist tools since ANSWER organized them. Politics is so much easier in a reason-free environment. :)