Tacitus published a post I would have responded to if
The murderous intersection of stupidity and fanaticism, right here.
That's it. The whole post.
The linked article is about Turkish resistance to the American Occupation spiking due to a newspaper report that Americans were raping Iraqi. Women. Most of the discussion in the thread was about whether or not Tacitus' headline was misleading.
I don't think the headline was misleading. I think it says what he intended it to say.
In the girl's testimony before a congressional caucus, well-documented in MacArthur's book "Second Front" and elsewhere, she described how, as a volunteer in a Kuwait maternity ward, she had seen Iraqi troops storm her hospital, steal the incubators, and leave 312 babies "on the cold floor to die."
Seven US Senators later referred to the story during debate; the motion for war passed by just five votes. In the weeks after Nayirah spoke, President Bush senior invoked the incident five times, saying that such "ghastly atrocities" were like "Hitler revisited."
But just weeks before the US bombing campaign began in January, a few press reports began to raise questions about the validity of the incubator tale.
Later, it was learned that Nayirah was in fact the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to Washington and had no connection to the Kuwait hospital.
She had been coached – along with the handful of others who would "corroborate" the story – by senior executives of Hill and Knowlton in Washington, the biggest global PR firm at the time, which had a contract worth more than $10 million with the Kuwaitis to make the case for war.
Want more from the same source (The Christian Science Monitor)? Too damn bad, because you get it anyway.
While the adage has it that "truth is the first casualty of war," senior administration officials say they cherish their credibility, and would not lie.
In a press briefing last September, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld noted occasions during World War II when false information about US troop movements was leaked to confuse the enemy. He paraphrased Winston Churchill, saying: "Sometimes the truth is so precious it must be accompanied by a bodyguard of lies."
Oh, yeah.
by Tom Regan
More than 10 years later, I can still recall my brother Sean's face. It was bright red. Furious. Not one given to fits of temper, Sean was in an uproar. He was a father, and he had just heard that Iraqi soldiers had taken scores of babies out of incubators in Kuwait City and left them to die. The Iraqis had shipped the incubators back to Baghdad. A pacifist by nature, my brother was not in a peaceful mood that day. "We've got to go and get Saddam Hussein. Now," he said passionately.
I completely understood his feelings. Although I had no family of my own then, who could countenance such brutality? The news of the slaughter had come at a key moment in the deliberations about whether the US would invade Iraq. Those who watched the non-stop debates on TV saw that many of those who had previously wavered on the issue had been turned into warriors by this shocking incident.
Too bad it never happened. The babies in the incubator story is a classic example of how easy it is for the public and legislators to be mislead during moments of high tension. It's also a vivid example of how the media can be manipulated if we do not keep our guards up.
Fine, The Turks lied on the American. But wars just don't get started, nor do they seem to proceed well, without lies. And if anything, it was hard right rhetorical technique that the Turks lifted. It had nothing to do with hard left positions or actions at all…wasn't even similar.
Posted by P6 at January 4, 2004 11:53 PM | Trackback URL: http://www.prometheus6.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2738This seems to be another instance of Americans jeering at other people for something they do themselves.
For instance, look how many Americans believe a conspiracy theory about 9/11, that Iraq was behind it. Kind of hard after that for us to blame others for believing their own conspiracy theories that feature their own enemy of choice as the culprit.
This seems to be another instance of Americans jeering at other people for something they do themselves.
More, it's an example of humans jeering at other humans for doing what humans do.
Well, yeah, that's a general human tendency and I didn't mean to imply otherwise. However, in this case it specifically is an example of Americans who are bashing "Islamists" for what they themselves do, and usually using that as a justification for some policy that they want to take against said Islamists.