Do not make the mistake of thinking that because my conclusion is the same as another person's that my reasoning is the same
When I'm bitter, I give you Ted Rall links.
The Unbearableness of Being Tom Freidman
My Plan for Post-War Iraq, by G.W.Bush
On the Campaign Trail (had to come up with that title myself)
The WaPo has this picture of the Northern Lights, currently enhanced by solar flare activity.
And I just KNOW Dubya's gonna think God is waving the American flag and go bomb somebody.
Want to see an interesting story about the Justice Department hiding stuff?
WASHINGTON, Oct. 30 � An internal report that harshly criticized the Justice Department's diversity efforts was edited so heavily when it was posted on the department's Web site two weeks ago that half of its 186 pages, including the summary, were blacked out.
The deleted passages, electronically recovered by a self-described "information archaeologist" in Tucson, portrayed the department's record on diversity as seriously flawed, specifically in the hiring, promotion and retention of minority lawyers.
The unedited report, completed in June 2002 by the consulting firm KPMG, found that minority employees at the department, which is responsible for enforcing the country's civil rights laws, perceive their own workplace as biased and unfair.
WIth Ashcroft in charge, is anyone surprised? Surprised at the bias or the hiding of the report? Half the report blacked out. ["dag, man. they couldn't even use wite-out, man...they had to BLACK that shit out, know what I'm saying?. It's racist, dawg, know what I'm saying?"]
And check THIS:
Trend-setter. That's kinda values-neutral, yo.
And it's not complimentary. It just says private industry will follow Justice's lead, figuring you can't be breaking the law if Justice is doing it too.
See why we didn't want Ashcroft's ass in the to begin with? Trend-setter.
Now, let me show you some REAL scary shit.
Who, exactly, are they trying to kid?
I haven't read the report yet. I need to, and will. Already downloaded it. But you have to admit, the news report is a bad sign…and all too in keeping with the way the whole administration functions.
Hi. Sorry I'm late.
My hardware AND the Net have been really flaky 'round these parts. Flaky to the point that I'm still not sure I've teased them apart. P6's load time sucked, but that was because a graphic in the "search for your legislator or media" box--which you'll note ain't there right now--was hanging. It's hosted remotely, one of those cut-and-paste-the-HTML dealies, which I forgot. So I'm looking at Mozilla's status bar saying it's getting something from fff.capwiz.com, and I'm like "WTF? I didn't post anything hosted there!"
The night light's reflection glinted brightly off the peak of the tin-foil hat.
On the other hand, there was no reason the site's CGI was unresponsive.
And as I said, the local hardware is screwy. The OS, actually…IE6 has a couple of nasty reproducable symptoms. It's not viral. I take excellent prophylactic measures (I've actually never had a computer virus) and the anti-virus is basically up to date anyway. I know when the problem started and it would be unfortunate if the particular web site I was loading at the time was a problem…I would just blame Microsoft but…
I got a Federal file just like everyone else. That wasn't a big concern to me a few years ago. But then:
And you know that legal thing Talkleft posted, that I said should be linked all over he place so folks know Luskin's threat toward Atrios is empty? Well, did you see the NY Times editorials today?
In an alarming ruling earlier this year, a closely divided Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to dismiss a patently unmeritorious libel action against Consumer Reports for a 1988 review that rated the Suzuki Samurai sports utility vehicle "not acceptable." It said the car, since discontinued, had a life-endangering tendency to tip and roll over. The court's refusal to reject this flimsy libel case and avoid an expensive jury trial has set an awful First Amendment precedent that threatens to chill reporting about important public issues, especially health and safety. Dozens of media organizations, including The Times, are calling upon the Supreme Court to add the case to this term's docket and undo the damage.
These calls for review come nearly 40 years after the Supreme Court's seminal decision in The New York Times Company v. Sullivan, which sought to safeguard robust reporting and comment about public issues by making speech about public figures actionable only when there is clear and convincing evidence that the publisher spoke with "actual malice." Among other things, that decision elevated the role of summary judgment as a tool for minimizing the speech-silencing specter of costly lawsuits by public figures.
Interesting, ain't it?
In the current environment, it wouldn't surprise me to see NYT v. Sullivan challenged. Nor would I be surprised if the Ninth Circuit's decision was used as a precident for a while. Not that it would be smart to press this vis a vis leftist bloggers, as some feel is the intent. The left is getting just as mean as the right…though if LGF and its ilk were shuttered…nah, nevermind.
I never used to be concerned about that sort of crap. And I don't like being concerned. It's enough reason in and of itself for me to go recruiting anti-neocon voters.
The first two issues of Justice League vs. The Avengers ain't half bad.
This from TalkLeft, so you KNOW it's the real deal.
Several folks are of the opinion this is a shot across the bow of the left BlogNet. I suggest the TalkLeft post become THE most link-to post in the history of the Internet. If everyone knows this is an empty threat then we can just continue the rather important business of savaging exposing the Republican Extremists out there.
As everyone knows by know (we're a little behind the 8 ball on this since we're out of town), Atrios got a letter from a lawyer named Jeffrey J. Upton in Massachussetts threatening to expose his identity and sue him over some of Atrios' posts --and reader comments to those posts-- about a NRO columnist named Donald Luskin.
Bloggers are not liable for the content of comments posted by readers. The Batzel case referred to in the article is Batzel v. Smith, 333 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003). The statute involved is 47 USCS � 230, The Communications Decency Act of 1996 . Since Batzel, the 9th Circuit has reaffirmed this position in Carafano v. Metrosplash.com, Inc., 339 F.3d 1119, 1122-1123 (U.S. App. , 2003). Yale Law Professor Jack Balkin agrees.
Upton charges that Atrios libeled Luskin by calling him a stalker. Professor Balkan responds:
Atrios should not have to go through this ordeal. We suspect, however, that just like the Fox suit against Franken lifted Franken's book up the best-seller charts, so too will Atrios ultimately benefit from the mainstream media attention the cease and desist letter will bring.
The post below is titled CAP Daily Briefing because it came from the Center for American Progress' Progress Report, which is a daily message they send out. Credit where due. And the corporate theft isn't all it covered.
I'll be using them as a source, but I doubt posting that big a chunk of their stuff on the regular. I can, since I'll be reading it every day anyway (in fact, if five people ask for it, I will). And I understand there are people who don't like to leave their email addresses laying about. But the fact is there's a bunch of stuff there…they even quote the Staten Island Advance, which NOBODY ever heard of.
Whatever I give you is filtered thru my head...which means you may miss stuff you'd have been interested if had you known about it. Plus I believe in giving folks enough to engage their curiousity, not to sate it.
It will be of assistance when Atrios guest blogs here tomorrow. But after that, folks REAL should look into the Center for American Progress for themselves.
I'll do this one time.
There isn't even coordination between the corporations, as efforts devolve into
a moebius strip of ineffectuality. Power stations, like those controlled by Bechtel, need gas and oil to run. The fuel refineries, run by Halliburton, need that power to run in order to supply that fuel, yet, Newsweek reports, there is little coordination between the corporations. One of the few things that can be detected is price gouging. As Reuters reports the U.S. government is paying Vice President Dick Cheney's former firm Halliburton "enormous sums'' - $2.65 a gallon - for gasoline imported into Iraq from Kuwait, according to Reps. Henry Waxman and John Dingell. The "gross overpayment" was made worse by the fact that the "U.S. government was turning around and reselling the gasoline in Iraq for four to 15 cents a gallon."
NEW REPORT - 'THE WINDFALLS OF WAR': The Center for Public Integrity releases a new report today showing that "more than 70 American companies and individuals have won up to $8 billion in contracts for work in postwar Iraq and Afghanistan over the last two years." Those companies "donated more money to the presidential campaigns of George W. Bush—a little over $500,000—than to any other politician over the last dozen years." For example, "Kellogg, Brown & Root, the subsidiary of Halliburton—which Vice President Dick Cheney led prior to being chosen as Bush's running mate in August 2000—was the top recipient of federal contracts for the two countries, with more than $2.3 billion awarded to the company. Bechtel Group, a major government contractor with similarly high-ranking ties, was second at around $1.03 billion."
HAZARD PAY FOR CORPORATE CONTRACTORS, NOT FOR U.S. TROOPS: Why are the price tags for outside contractors so outrageously expensive? This week's Newsweek magazine reports, "One reason U.S. taxpayers are forking over top dollar to have [private U.S. contractors in Iraq]...Much of what companies are charging is for hazardous duty (at major engineering companies, that means 45% extra, taking engineers up to nearly $900 for a 10-hour day)." While private contractors soak up tax dollars in hazard pay, however, the White House has tried to cut hazard pay for American soldiers actually in harm's way, fighting the war. The Army Times wrote in June that, "The Bush administration announced that on Oct. 1 it wants to roll back recent modest increases in monthly imminent-danger pay (from $225 to $150) and family-separation allowance (from $250 to $100) for troops getting shot at in combat zones." (For more on the Administration's mistreatment of U.S. troops, click HERE .
IRAQ SPENDING BILL GETS CLOSER TO PASSAGE: Congress is about to approve President Bush's $87 billion package, even though criticism over lack of
transparency and hesitation over the use of the money still swirls. AP reports, "Lawmakers have been increasingly uneasy about the rising human toll and financial costs of U.S. involvement in Iraq. They have questioned whether the Bush administration has done enough to win international assistance and how long U.S. troops will have to remain there."
Republicans defeated a Democratic proposal to require "confirmation for Bush's
civilian administrator in Iraq, the position held by L. Paul Bremer," which
would have required the Administration to become more accountable in Iraq. And while the House approved legislation yesterday authorizing an increase in the paltry, Vietnam-era $6,000 death benefit for families of servicemen killed in action, there is no funding to make it a reality in the spending bill.
THIS IS GETTING EMBARRASSING: The WSJ's Al Hunt writes, "the Bush administration's mistakes and misrepresentations since May 1 (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/05/iraq/20030501-15.html) are continuing unabated. There's the pretense the war is over, that the press is hiding all the good stuff, and the region and the world are safer and more secure. The president's rare Tuesday news conference was embarrassing. Administration insiders privately talk about a downward 'glide' of U.S. forces in Iraq next year, but when asked if there will be lower troop levels next year Mr. Bush declared that's 'a trick question.' More troops now, given the increasing violence? That's Gen. Abizaid's task, not mine."
So fourth-grade NYC teacher Gail Kaplan sees a picture of a gorilla on a kids folder and says "You took a picture of your family and put it on the front of your folder."
Told the girl not to tell her parents about the "joke," so she knew it was wrong.
And when called in to a "conference," apologizes thusly:
"I always joke that way with my husband and family"
Always calls her family gorillas?
"If I had known it was [the girl], I wouldn't have said it."
If she has known WHAT was the girl? She knew WHO she was talking to.
Fire the bitch.
'Well, You Try To Reconstruct Iraq,' Says U.S. Defensive Dept.
WASHINGTON, DC�Responding to recent criticism of reconstruction efforts in Iraq, the U.S. Defensive Department released a statement to the public Monday suggesting that perhaps they could do better, since they're obviously so smart.
"Well, it looks like you American people have figured it all out, then," the statement read in part. "There's no need for the old government to do anything, because the citizens know just how to handle this whole reconstruction-of-Iraq thing. Well, go ahead! If it's so simple, and if you're so smart, then what's stopping you? Come on."
"Oh, gosh!" the statement continued. "Wait! It looks like Iraq is a whole big country! And it seems that someone just fought a war there, to oust a despotic regime! So, gee, this might take a while, huh?"
"Pettibone" has a point, don't he?
Where you just don't feel political? Yeah, Bush put his foot in his mouth. Yeah, Luskin's people sent Atrios a toothless threat. Yeah, Conservatives are complaining that the Democratic candidates haven't given a detailed plan on Iraq when they ain't the ones that was supposed to have one in advance.
So what do you want from me?
I'm thinking psychological recently. I need a refresher reading of Positioning: The Battle For Your Mind.
People who depend on communication for their livelihood know the necessity of oversimplification.
Let's say you are meeting with a politician whom you are trying to get elected. In the first 5 minutes, you'll learn more about your political product than the average voter is going to learn about that person in the next 5 years.
Since so little material about your candidate is ever going to get into the mind of the voter, your job is really not a "communication" project in the ordinary sense of the word.
It's a selection project.You have to select the material that has the best chance of getting through.
This will help me think about how to frame stuff for the upcoming election…for which I WILL be political, whether I feel like it or not.
Shedding light on slavery in America
Oct. 28, 2003
KALAMAZOO -- A traveling exhibit of 18th- and 19th-century slavery-related artifacts will be the focal point of a series of Western Michigan University events designed to shed light on the history of slavery in America and to promote a community dialog on racism today.
The Middle Passage and African American History Museum exhibit, which is based in Gulfport, Miss., will be on campus Monday, Nov. 3, through Friday, Nov. 14, on the third floor of Waldo Library's atrium area. The display may be viewed from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Thursday and from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Parking is available in the ramp and lots near Miller Auditorium.
Just weeks after the exhibit's brief September stop in Kalamazoo, WMU's Graduate Student Advisory Committee is sponsoring an encore appearance with support from the University's Lewis Walker Institute for Race and Ethnic Relations. Admission is free, and donations in any amount are welcome.
The exhibit features some 250 slavery objects and documents dating back to the late 1700s and will include a host of items that were not on display in September. The artifacts represent the ongoing work of Middle Passage and African American History Museum proprietors James and Mary Ann Petty. This husband-wife team has amassed more than 15,000 pieces of slavery-era items ranging from branding irons and iron shackles to cigar-box guitars and slave-made pottery.
Their work constitutes one of the largest private collections of such material in the country and has attracted national attention through media outlets such as the "Oprah Winfrey Show," the New York Times, People Magazine, CNN, Le Monde, Black Entertainment Television and National Public Radio's "All Things Considered."
The Pettys, who will be in Kalamazoo to help explain the exhibit, are working to establish an estimated $45-million brick and mortar museum project. Once completed, it will be the first major slavery museum highlighting African American history from the shores of Africa to America.
Nancy Greer-Williams, a doctoral associate in WMU's Graduate College, was instrumental in bringing the middle passage exhibit back to Michigan. While viewing the display with her Race, Ethnicity and Gender class during its previous stop in Kalamazoo, Greer-Williams says a class member used the example of a vicious crime against his wife as being a reason for racism and his hatred of blacks.
"I couldn't look at his wife but everyone else did, and it really bothered me that this man was so consumed by his hatred of one man's act that he exposed his wife and her most horrible incident and did not realize it," she says.
"I decided at that time that we needed to have this exhibit back and also to open the door to have discussions on slavery as it exists now. So besides seeing the exhibit and speaking with Mary Anne and Jim Petty, we invite the public and WMU community to express their views about race, ethnicity, gender, and how to heal racism at two seminars we'll be having."
As a way of initiating an audiencewide dialogue, diverse panelists in the on-campus seminars will discuss the barriers they encounter on a daily basis. The first program, "A Centennial Look at Slavery and its Residual Effects," will take place at 6 p.m. Thursday, Nov. 13, in Room 208 of the Bernhard Center. The second program, "Diverse Perspectives: A Centennial Look at Religion, Gender, Class and Abilities," will take place at 6 p.m. Thursday, Nov. 20, in the Bernhard Center's Brown and Gold Room.
Several other events also are being sponsored by the Walker Institute, along with WMU's African Studies Program, to look deeper into the history of slavery and foster candid yet constructive community dialog about racism in America today.
Monday, Nov. 3
Noon--African Ceremonial Processional (kick-off celebration) featuring African dancing and drummers, from the Siebert Administration Building to the Bernhard Center.
12:30 p.m.--Virtual Reality Tour of African American Slave Artifact Exhibit, Room 210 Bernhard Center.
7 p.m.--Public lecture by Jim and Mary Anne Petty, Lee Honors College.
Tuesday, Nov. 4
7 p.m.--Performance reading of "To Be Sold," which combines music and dance with authentic slave narratives and the historical record to explore the legacy of bondage through poignant artistic expressions of survival and triumph, Room 210 Bernhard Center.
Wednesday, Nov. 5
7 p.m.--Presentation and discussion of the film "SANKOFA," a story about a self-possessed African American woman sent on a spiritual journey in time to experience the pain of slavery and to discover her African identity, Room 3502 Knauss Hall.
Friday, Nov. 7
11 a.m.--Think tank discussion of "How Does It Feel to Be African and American? Questions of Consciousness," Bernhard Center's Bronco Mall food court.
Sunday, Nov. 9
11 a.m.--Sunday worship with pastor Lindsey Bell, First United Baptist Church, 821 S. Burdick St., Kalamazoo.
For more information about the middle passage exhibit, or to schedule a meeting with the Pettys or a group tour of the exhibit, contact Greer-Williams at (269) 387-6181 or
Media contact: Jeanne Baron, 269 387-8400, [email protected]
Same reason Chris Rock wouldn't.
LatinoPundit points to an article on the dispute between those Hispanic folks who prefer to be called "Latino" and those Latino folks who prefer to be called "Hispanic."
And where does "Chicano" fit into all this?
I have to admit, as an Colored/African/Negro/Black/Afr(ican-or-o)-American/Nubian/Afrikan/Nigga I can only look on with bemusement and offer this advice:
It's only as deep as you let it be.
Marty wakes up at home with a huge hangover.
He forces himself to open his eyes, and the first thing he sees are a couple of aspirins and a glass of water on the side table.
He sits down and sees his clothing in front of him, all clean and pressed. Marty looks around the room and sees that it is in perfect order, spotless, clean. So's the rest of the house.
He takes the aspirins and notices a note on the table, reading
"Honey, breakfast is on the stove. I left early to go shopping. Love you!"
He goes to the kitchen and sure enough, there is a hot breakfast and the morning newspaper. His son is also at the table, eating.
Marty asks, "Son, what happened last night?"
His son says, "Well, you came home after 3 a.m., drunk and delirious. Broke some furniture, puked in the hallway, and gave yourself a black eye when you stumbled into the door."
Confused, Marty asks, "So, why is everything in order and so clean, and breakfast is on the table waiting for me?"
His son replies, "Oh, that! Mom dragged you to the bedroom, and when she tried to take your pants off, you yelled, 'Lady, leave me alone, I'm a married man'!"
I was going to say Digby fileted Lord Saleton. But then I read his view of George Lakoff's framing the Conservative/Progressive axis as Strict Father/Nurturing Parent…though as he say, nuturing mother is the more accurate way of saying it.
Since Saleton's statement was all fat and no bone, "filet" is the wrong image. So:
Digby sliced up Lord Saleton's attempt to denigrate Clark by equating Kosovo and Iraqi.
Now I think I'll give some thought to how Progressives can frame issues this Presidential season.
Over on Tacitus, m. scott eiland is waiting to see how the Democratic Presidential candidates will blame Dubya for this huge solar flare heading our way.
Over on MaxSpeaks, Max is waiting for liberals to catch the blame for it.
sigh
I'd be much less sanguine about this if any of my people had been on the ferry. But my ex, my daughter's mom, was on the ferry that crashed—with this crew—the very run before the crash.
Two witnesses to the Staten Island ferry crash this month said they saw the ferry's assistant captain erect and alone at the controls about a minute before the vessel slammed into a pier, killing 10 people, an official briefed on the investigation said yesterday.
The witnesses � a crew member and a man on a nearby tugboat � also said that the ferry's captain, Michael J. Gansas, was not in the Staten Island pilothouse of the Andrew J. Barberi, as he told investigators, the official said.
The witness on the tugboat saw Captain Gansas running across the top of the ferry � from the Manhattan pilothouse to the Staten Island pilothouse � after the accident, and the crew member, who was in the Staten Island pilothouse, said Captain Gansas was not there roughly a minute before the boat crashed, the official said.
The two accounts throw into question some of the earlier versions of events that led up to the Oct. 15 crash. Those include one provided by the assistant captain, Richard J. Smith, who suggested to the police in a brief initial statement that he had lost consciousness, and another by Captain Gansas, who said on the day of the crash that he was in the pilothouse and tried to stop the boat from ramming into the pier.
Let me point out this post:
Oh. Wait. I know why:
Deep South slave shrine stirs old hatreds: Plans for a unique museum are placed on hold in the face of death threats from white supremacists, reports David Rennie in Gulfport, Mississippi
... Dr Jones would like to see the museum set up in the South. "That's going to take someone mighty brave, even prepared to cost themselves a political career."
Rip Daniels, a businessman and broadcaster and the Pettys' most prominent black backer, fears the costs for the couple could be still higher. "What Jim has here is heresy," he said. "These objects show that African Americans did not acquiesce, that they did not submit graciously."
Mr Daniels, who owns a local radio station and is one of its presenters, believes that defiant white Southerners are increasingly denying the reality of slavery.
"When you talk to the Sons of Confederate Veterans, they don't talk about actual historical events, they talk of the 'southern gentleman', of how he must have been."
To Mr Daniels, whites have two choices. "They can justify their ancestors, or they can accept that they participated in a horrible episode of American history" he said. "As an African-American, I have to accept that some of my ancestors were in chains."
Rip Daniels has received death threats himself, including a postcard of a lynching, with the message, "You're next".
Even better is the "minister" that wrote this tripe
... "Slavery as it existed in the South was not an adversarial relationship with pervasive racial animosity," the booklet reads. "Because of its dominantly patriarchal character, it was a relationship based upon mutual affection and confidence. There has never been a multi-racial society which has existed with such mutual intimacy and harmony in the history of the world."
If by "intimacy" he means rape and by "harmony" he means brutal suppression, yeah it was intimate and harmonious.
Buy a fucking clue. Picture you great grandparents in that condition, fucking fools. And I can see you feeling it all worked well for YOUR forebears, but Black folks HATED those lazy, cheating, lying, selfish, violent, brutal, manipulating, collaborating-even-when-not-actually-holding-the-whip mother fuckers. And if you believe otherwise, you are either self-deluding or just plain stupid.
Now. Any confederate flag flying bastard got something to say? Because if you want to claim it's all about the culture, you betta understand what that culture really was before you step to me. To claim your culture wasn't about suppressing Black folks is like claiming your house has nothing to do with the basement it's on, the ground the foundation is sunk into.
With Tyler Cowen's admiration of Charles Murray, I've decided that, though there's meat on them Volokhian bones, much of it is rancid.
Truth in advertising—that second link is to Orcinus, wherein David Niewart explains the deeply troubling roos of the methods Cowen says he has no problem with.
Natalie at All Facts & Opinions spotted an interview with Jim Hightower wherein Mr. Hightower has some good advice for Greens and Dems:
Hightower: Yes. I think Nader was the best Democrat in the race. But it's not helpful for us to continue to fight that last Presidential election. There are those who say Nader cost Gore the election. Come on! Gore's got to take responsibility for his own campaign at some point.
But all of that aside, now we face the reality of an Administration that is absolutely nutty. There's that old country song, "It felt so good when it stopped hurting." So we've got to stop the pain. But in doing so, we should not fool ourselves that we have gained some progressive victory. What we will have done is to get us back to a ground level where we can build again for a progressive victory that is several years down the road. [P6: emphasis added]
You don't build a movement by running for President. It's got to be built by good organizing at the grassroots level around issues, bringing people in across lines, like privacy, like NAFTA and the WTO, like the USA Patriot Act. And then running people for mayor, state rep, then moving up to Congress, then to the Senate, and then President. I think we are eight-to-twelve years away from electing a President. But we are far along now because insurgent Democrats, Greens, the Working Families Party, the Labor Party, and others are making strides and winning seats and showing that government can indeed be different.
Q: Are you advising the Greens to run someone for President?
Hightower: I hope they don't. I think the Greens probably will, but the question is will they run someone of the stature of Nader. I hope not because I think it is detrimental to their cause, to building a progressive party for the future.
I had gotten comfortable NOT receiving notice of the comments I enter here. So after installing MT-Blacklist 1.5 I hacked it a little, changing line 3496 from
MT::Mail->send(\%head, $body);
to
MT::Mail->send(\%head, $body) unless $author->email eq $comment->email;
This very post is the test.
On the Today Show this morning, one of the anchors (Al Roker?) said at any given moment there were about 500 guys out fighting those fires at his location in California, and they could use five times that number. But they weren't going to get them
How many guys could we mobilize to help if they weren't all in Iraq, mopping up behind an optional war?
How much fire fighting equipment could be mobilized if it weren't fighting pipeline fires in Iraq?
I'm not sure. But seriously, couldn't the National Guard and the Reserves pour hella resources into this…if they were here?
And when he's being embarrassed by his own statements, he gets out of it by lying some more!
This is from the White House's own web site:
THE PRESIDENT: Nora, I think you ought to look at my speech. I said, Iraq is a dangerous place and we've still got hard work to do, there's still more to be done. And we had just come off a very successful military operation. I was there to thank the troops.
The "Mission Accomplished" sign, of course, was put up by the members of the USS Abraham Lincoln, saying that their mission was accomplished. I know it was attributed some how to some ingenious advance man from my staff -- they weren't that ingenious, by the way.
NTodd (who I know from Open Source Politics) reminded the dKos crew about this gem, though:
...The most elaborate - and criticized - White House event so far was Mr. Bush's speech aboard the Abraham Lincoln announcing the end of major combat in Iraq. White House officials say that a variety of people, including the president, came up with the idea, and that Mr. [Scott] Sforza embedded himself on the carrier to make preparations days before Mr. Bush's landing in a flight suit and his early evening speech.
Media strategists noted afterward that Mr. Sforza and his aides had choreographed every aspect of the event, even down to the members of the Lincoln crew arrayed in coordinated shirt colors over Mr. Bush's right shoulder and the "Mission Accomplished" banner placed to perfectly capture the president and the celebratory two words in a single shot. The speech was specifically timed for what image makers call "magic hour light," which cast a golden glow on Mr. Bush.
"If you looked at the TV picture, you saw there was flattering light on his left cheek and slight shadowing on his right," Mr. King said. "It looked great."
Isn't that precious?
Let's see if we can convice Al Franken's publishers to put Bush on the cover of the next press run of his book.
via dKos
This was going to be a comment, but I decided I want it to have a higher profile.
The flyer Republicans used to recruit its poll watchers in Kentucky refers to the A. Phillip Randolph Institute as "the black militant division of the AFL-CIO and funded in part by the DNC." Pure race-card politics, and the right wingers out there that constantly claim Democrats play the race card need to repudiate this.
But this should not be taken as an implication that progressives should back away from the Institute. People are always "sending messages," so sometimes I feel the need to counter what they will try to extract as a "message" from a statement that means no more than what is said.
Back when I started Prometheus 6, the motto under the banner read,
Who can disagree with that?
If you don't know about A. Philip Randolph, then you're missing a significant chunk of knowledge about Black people, the labor movement and the UsofA in general. Start with Nathan Newman's MLK Day post and follow the links within.
The Institute, like Randolph himself, is something to be proud of.
1965 Also was the year the A. Philip Randolph Institute (APRI), a national organization of black trade unionists, was founded.
APRI's mission, from our founding to the present, has been to fight for racial equality and economic justice. Our role is unique we work with black trade unionists, the people best suited to serve as a bridge between labor and the black community.
APRI spearheads what we term the "Black-Labor Alliance." We build black community support for the trade union movement, and convey to labor the needs and concerns of black Americans.With more than 150 chapters in 36 states, APRI members are involved in political and community education, lobbying, legislative action and labor support activities.
Now, there's a certain class of people who will see this as the very definition of Black militancy. The kind of person that makes a great Republican poll watcher. But if they actually understood the organization's program maybe it would give them pause. Maybe.
Let's take a look at the Institute's agenda and see how it would affect white folks if implemented exactly as they request:
We seek structural changes through the American democratic process. From courthouse to state house to the White House, APRI members actively promote social, economic, labor, political and legislative issues. We support:
What, exactly, is in this that even a white supremacist should object to…I mean outside the obvious? What is in here that is not beneficial to EVERYONE?
What really angers me is that Black civil rights organizations fairly contort themselves to be inclusive of all people. They never suggest anything that isn't universally beneficial. And they are smeared by people who (I am convinced) know better.
You've heard by now of this organization. It's just starting up, but looks to have potential. At minimum is can help raise the profile of issues important to progressives. I'd say they're intending to be the left's equivalent to The Cato Society, while the American Constitution Society is our Federalist Society.
I've signed up for all the content email the Center for American Progress will produce. I'm not intending to be an official organ or anything like that—it's a news-junkie think. But I do share their overarching goals and so will pass along anything I find important (with my personal amplifications, of course).
I have something to work on this morning, but I also have a concept that's been gnawing at the back of my forehead trying to get out. It's a thought/question for the Christian evangelicals of the world.
The Bible pretty much makes it clear the majority of folks aren't going to make it out of life alive, while the true Children of God, the true Body of the Church will.
That being the case, why are Christian Evangelicals trying to become the majority?
See, making The Word available, that I can understand. But requiring adherance to The Word of others, even for their own benefit, denies the free will that God gave all humans…the free will, without which, one can't choose God. And that choice is necessary for salvation to be real, yes?
Taking away choice, denying the gift of God…now, who would do that sort of thing? Who has been doing it all along?
Teach your faith, share you knowledge. But in the end, it's you and your true community to whom you are responsible. And remember that even if the teachings are true, the way you teach them can be wrong.
…that by placing:
<a name="<$MTEntryID pad="1"$>" href="http://<$MTBlogHost$>/path-to/mt.cgi?__mode=view&_type=entry&id=<$MTEntryID$>&blog_id=<$MTBlogID$>" onclick="OpenComments (this.href); return false"> </a>
in a strategic place you will have an invisible link that will open a window that allows you to edit the MT post you've embedded the link in?
Or that by placing:
<a name="<$MTCommentID pad="1"$>" href="http://<$MTBlogHost$>/path-to/mt.cgi?__mode=view&_type=comment&id=<$MTCommentID$>&blog_id=<$MTBlogID$>" onclick="OpenComments (this.href); return false"> </a>
in a strategic place you can do the same with comments?
Advantage: with entries, when you see that stupid misspelling you can fix it on the fly, with the text (minus all those distracting markup tags that probabl made you miss the error in the first place). Same with comments, plus you can delete assholes without searching for them.
Actually, the OpenComments javascript function makes the window kind of small for editing posts, so I have a seperate function that opens an 800px wide window (hey, it fits on my screen and no one else will use it anyway). Or you can just change OpenComments() so that it creates a resizeable window,
I had a cartoon to run with this, but that seems to bother folks for some reason, so…
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) today ridiculed the Republican Party for planning to place Election Day challengers at 59 voting precincts in predominantly Black neighborhoods in Kentucky. Voters there will cast ballots in the hotly contested race for governor on Tuesday, November 4, 2003.
Kweisi Mfume, NAACP President and CEO said: "The use of challengers at majority African American precincts amounts to nothing but blatant voter intimidation by the Republican Party. All Kentucky voters deserve to cast their ballots without the presence of this type of threat or harassment. The GOP must not be allowed to frighten voters of color away from exercising their constitutional rights in Kentucky or any other jurisdiction in the nation."
William E. Cofield, NAACP National Board of Directors, who represents Kentucky, said: "It is reprehensible. Anytime the GOP can target just Black precincts and not place challengers at all of the polling places is racist. We are going to fight it."
Kentucky law allows each political party to place one challenger at any precinct on Election Day to question the credentials of any voter who they have "a reason to believe" is not registered, not who they claim to be or not a resident in the precinct. Challenged voters must sign an oath asserting their legitimacy before receiving a ballot. Those who refuse to sign would not be allowed to vote unless an election officer intervenes on their behalf. The Democratic Party does not plan to use challengers.
Mfume encouraged African American voters to carry a picture ID with a current address to their voting precincts "go to the polls prepared to defend your right to vote and armed with your photo identification," he said.
The NAACP, a non-partisan organization, has conducted voter registration drives and get-out-the vote campaigns for 94 years. It is a prominent and active leader in guaranteeing voting rights across the country.
Founded in 1909, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) is the nation�s oldest and largest civil rights organization. Its half-million adult and youth members throughout the United States and the world are the premier advocates for civil rights in their communities, conducting voter registration drives and monitoring equal opportunity in the public and private sectors.
The Modular Computing Core (MCC) is the most advanced mobile computer on the market. It contains all the normal features of a desktop computer: a processor, a hard drive, memory, video card, audio card, Windows XPTM Professional, and more. But it is an amazingly compact replacement for that big computer box under your desk.
Aside from the small size, what is unique is the modularity. The external power supply, the visual display, the communications and input/output connectors are all packaged separately from the core, and are transformed into modular shells and accessories that you choose based on your individual preferences and work environment.
The MCC has the functionality of a normal desktop computer, but it is condensed into a small 7.6 x 12.7 x 1.9 cm (3" x 5" x 3/4") package that is very similar to the size of a PDA or laptop battery. Low power consumption makes it ideal for portable applications that allow you to be in locations other than your desk. The MCC is also very intelligent, automatically identifying and adapting to attached Shells and devices. Its operating system, power management, thermal, software and user interface behavior will automatically match your attached shell or accessory.
The MCC runs the full Windows XPTM Professional operating system, so when you use it with the desktop cradle or handheld, you'll be using the same user interface and applications that you've come to depend on. It also makes possible a broad range of mobile, fixed location, industrial and non-traditional computing experiences.
What the fuck is wrong with New Jersey that they keep putting kids in fucked up situations like this?
What the fuck is wrong with New Jersey that they can send case workers around, get positive reports back, and still shit like this goes on?
New Jersey Couple Held in Abuse; One Son, 19, Weighed 45 Pounds
By LYDIA POLGREEN and ROBERT F. WORTH
COLLINGSWOOD, N.J., Oct. 26 � The parents of four boys adopted from New Jersey's troubled foster care system were arrested Friday, two weeks after the police found that the children, ages 9 to 19, had been starved to the point that none of them weighed more than 50 pounds, according to the Camden County prosecutor.
The boys were so badly malnourished that their shriveled bodies gave no hint of their ages, investigators said. At 19, the oldest was 4 feet tall and weighed 45 pounds. The police initially thought he was just 10 years old. The boys' condition was discovered when a neighbor called the police because the 19-year-old, Bruce, was looking for food in the neighbor's trash at 2:30 a.m. on Oct. 10, according to the county prosecutor, Vincent P. Sarubbi. The boys were removed from the home later that day.
The boys had been locked out of the kitchen of the house in this blue-collar Philadelphia suburb and were fed a diet of pancake batter, peanut butter and breakfast cereal. They ate wallboard and insulation to sate their hunger, investigators said.
A caseworker from the Division of Youth and Family Services, the state agency that oversees the foster care system, had visited the house at 318 White Horse Pike 38 times in the past 2 years, investigators said. The parents, Raymond Jackson, 50, and his wife, Vanessa, 48, rented the house, which passed a safety assessment by the caseworker and her supervisor in June.
I think Israel should stop even pretending they want a two state solution to their security problems. It's just prolonging a situation that can't come to a good end.
JERUSALEM, Oct. 27 � Eight recently erected Jewish settlement outposts in the West Bank could soon receive government services like electricity and phones lines, a Defense Ministry official said Monday. Palestinians denounced the proposal as a violation of the stalled Middle East peace plan.
The plan calls for Israel to dismantle all settlements built since Prime Minister Ariel Sharon came to power in March 2001. Since it was formally introduced in June, only a handful have been removed, and about 60 remain, according to Peace Now, an Israeli monitoring group.
The Israeli official, Ron Shechner, who advises the defense minister on settlements, said it was not his position to determine whether the recently built settlements should remain or be torn down.
But as long as Israelis "are there on the ground, you have to give them the basic security means," Mr. Shechner said on Israeli radio. He cited electricity, phones, fences and schools as services the government could soon deliver. Most settlement outposts consist of only a few mobile homes on desolate hilltops.
If the building of new settlements is against the current national policy.
BUt, of course, I'm sure the situation is too complex for me to judge from such a remove.
A Willful Ignorance
By PAUL KRUGMAN
According to The New York Times, President Bush was genuinely surprised to learn from moderate Islamic leaders that they had become deeply distrustful of American intentions. The report on the "perception gap" suggests that the leader of the war on terror has no idea how badly that war � which must, ultimately, be a war for hearts and minds � is going.
Mr. Bush's ignorance may reflect his lack of curiosity: "The best way to get the news," he says, "is from objective sources. And the most objective sources I have are people on my staff." Two words: emperor, clothes.
But there's something broader going on: a sort of willful ignorance, supposedly driven by moral concerns but actually reflecting domestic politics. Surely it's important to understand how others see us, but a new, post 9/11 version of political correctness has made it difficult even to discuss their points of view. Any American who tries to go beyond "America good, terrorists evil," who tries to understand � not condone � the growing world backlash against the United States, faces furious attacks delivered in a tone of high moral indignation. The attackers claim to be standing up for moral clarity, and some of them may even believe it. But they are really being used in a domestic political struggle.
Last week I found myself caught up in that struggle. I wrote about why Mahathir Mohamad, Malaysia's prime minister � a clever if loathsome man who adjusts the volume of his anti-Semitism depending on circumstances � chose to include an anti-Jewish diatribe in his speech to an Islamic conference. Sure enough, I was accused in various places not just of "tolerance for anti-Semitism" (yes, I'm Jewish) but of being in Mr. Mahathir's pay. Smear tactics aside, the thrust of the attacks was that because anti-Semitism is evil, anyone who tries to understand why politicians foment anti-Semitism � and looks for ways other than military force to combat the disease � is an apologist for anti-Semitism and is complicit in evil.
Yet that moral punctiliousness is curiously selective. Last year the Bush administration, in return for a military base in Uzbekistan, gave $500 million to a government that, according to the State Department, uses torture "as a routine investigation technique," and whose president has killed opponents with boiling water. The moral clarity police were notably quiet.
This IS to be an independant investigation, right?
WASHINGTON, Oct. 27 � President Bush declined on Monday to commit the White House to turning over highly classified intelligence reports to the federal commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, despite public threats of a subpoena from the bipartisan panel.
The president said in a brief meeting with reporters that the documents were "very sensitive" and that the White House was still discussing the issue with the panel's chairman, Thomas H. Kean, the former Republican governor of New Jersey.
Mr. Bush's remarks and subsequent comments from his press secretary suggested that the White House might ultimately refuse the commission's demand for access to the documents, setting up a possible showdown between the White House and the independent investigators.
Last week, Mr. Kean said for the first time that he was prepared to issue a subpoena and risk a courtroom battle with the White House if the documents were not turned over within weeks.
Officials for the commission say the documents include copies of the so-called Presidential Daily Briefing � the summary prepared each morning by the Central Intelligence Agency for the Oval Office � that Mr. Bush received in the weeks before the attacks. The White House refused to provide the reports to House and Senate investigators last year for their investigation of the attacks, citing executive privilege.
Jay Allen has version 1.5 of MT-Blacklist ready for you.
We�re talking some serious power that you�ve always been lacking.
Furthermore, thanks to Stepan Riha as well as the removal of comment/trackback filtering (which wasn�t needed with Search & De-spam in effect) every function of the plugin is phenomenally faster.
There are many more changes that you can read about in the documentation, so I�ll leave it at that for now.
He has a great suggestion on how to respond to the Republican culture wars offensive.
There's Baghdad Burning by Riverbend. The real thing.
Then there's this. Url is http://riverSbendblog.blogspot.com/ instead of http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/. Template, graphics everything stolen from the original.
Just so's ya know.
"You mean that back before civilization economics was much simpler?" asks the Ten-Year-Old.
"Yes," says the Thirteen-Year-Old. "Back then, Principles of Economics books were really simple. They said: '(1) Find a rock. (2) Throw the rock to kill some small furry creature. (3) Eat the small furry creature.' That was it."
"But then things became more complicated. People invented farming, and some people became peasant farmers who grew the crops."
"And other people became workers who made pots," says the Ten-Year-Old. "And other people became blacksmiths who made spears."
"And," says the Thirteen-Year-Old, "then the people who got the spears told the peasants and the workers to give them half their crop--or else!"
See Michael at Move The Crowd.
LATER: Oh, that was Ferengi Rules of Acquisition. I didn't notice the difference (though I did wonder about the lobes…)
I think the thing that annoys me about Conservatives the most is they all write as though there's no context except their own individual view.
I make such an analogy, following my Pop!tech experience.
Open systems win. The Angry Left, because it is closed-minded, is in no condition to govern. Barring a catastrophe at home or abroad, I doubt that it will be given the opportunity to do so.
What about The Angry Right?
I used to like Arnold Kling when he talked about economics…
Check out the robots.txt file for http://www.whitehouse.gov/. It's like anything related to Iraq should not be looked at by search engines.
Too late. We know already.
LATER: Kicking Ass figured out why.
Now that the World Series is over, you people have NO EXCUSE for watching Fox during the week. We excuse you for football, but after the Super Bowl, that's it.
He pointed out the RNC's retraction, to wit:
Now that we acknowledge our error we hope People For the American Way and the NAACP and the 9 Democratic Presidential candidates will repudiate this offensive political cartoon.
First of all, there's hella difference between The Black Commentator, PFAW and the NAACP's sites. It reflects poorly on SOMEbody's intelligence to get them crossed up.
Secondly, I wish I had thought of the cartoon.
Third, Aaron's commentary is superior to mine.
Erica at Swirlspice had an open door policy this past weekend, and I missed it. Something about it making the rounds, folks setting up a guest account and letting random folks post with the understanding that she can pull what she don't want to see on her blog.
It was amusing, and I went backwards through some of the links folks left behind. I'm not that trusting, though.
There's this website, The Black Conservative that's just, well, stupid. I was going to do this great introduction, but in the end the site is best summed up as, well, stupid. At least if it's an attempt to speak to Black folks, and I don't think it is. I can't remember the last Black Conservative© I felt wanted to help Black people rather than make guilty liberal white folks change their political party.
Okay, Glen Loury.
Anyway, the first article on the site today is an excellent example of why I feel the site is just, well, stupid. "The Black KKKommentator" is written by Bob Parks, who in the process demonstrates why he is a former California congressional candidate rather than a former (or current) California congressperson.
To begin with, he's a Black supremacist.
Yes, he wrote that. It's an example of the careless tossing about of rhetoric that fills the article.
"We all look alike?"
And in the conservative world, how much attention would I get with my independant thought? WHITE people aren't allowed independant thought in the Conservative movement. It's all about that discipline, remember?
Since Conservative house negros have the choice of private school for their kids too, let's just say all parents want the same choice house negros have, okay?
Then I can shoot that down too. Because parents want their kids to have quality education. If this could be had within the public school system, no one would complain. And history shows it can be, unless one wants to argue that the public school system has ALWAYS been a failure…an argument I haven't seen put forth yet.
Here comes something REALLY stupid.
In the liberal world one should not expect high school students be capable of better legal research. In fact, since we are only talking about black people, there should not be any expectations at all. Just a stroke on the back and a doggie treat.
In any reasonable world one should not expect high school students to be capable of better legal research than a judge's colleagues. If Mr. Parks truly as such expectations of high school students he is ignorant of what legal research is and involves.
But what if that means ALLOWING the teachers to teach, rather than forcing them? What if it means up to date equipment and books? Or an acknowledgement of environmental issues that impact students? Suppose removing obstacles is easier than driving each individual student around or over the same obstacles? What if it involves more carrot and less stick?
And what "liberal government" would that be?
By Martin Weil
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, October 28, 2003; 7:53 AM
Walter E. Washington, 88, who led the District through the turbulence of the 1960s and 1970s and served as the city's first elected mayor in modern times, died early today at Howard University Hospital.
His death was announced by a spokesman for Mayor Anthony A. Williams' office.
The cause of death was not immediately available, but he had been hospitalized for several weeks.
As the first black person to head the government of a major U.S. city, Washington was a symbol of the great changes that were to come in American society, as the gains of the civil rights struggle were translated into political reality.
Safire writes on drug costs today. There's much I take exception to in the editorial, but I want to point out two specific issues for now.
Since marketing drugs at the level the manufacturers choose to costs as much as developing drugs, one could as easily say new prescription drugs cost so much mainly because it includes the producers' huge investment in marketing.
Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield published a series of reports on prescription drug usage in Iowa and South Dakota that has some interesting information that applies outside its market as well.
This direct to consumer advertising is medically unnecessary, because consumers are not qualified to judge whether or not these new drugs are applicable to whatever condition thet have…their sole purpose is to interest consumers in the most expensive treatment option.
As in the run-up to the Iraq war, spin rather than truth is the order of the day.
The tough-minded approach: Raise overseas sales prices to include the cost of research (which should lower prices here somewhat). …
It will not lower prices here because management philosophy calls to seeking maximum, not reasonable, or even optimal, profit.
Safire's suggestion could start a trade war, one that (like the war in Iraq) we'd readily win on paper but could become a quagmire. That's because a large fraction (70-80%, according to a December 2000 NY Times article) of key components in the manufacture of generic drugs come from overseas.
The Doughnut's Hole
By WILLIAM SAFIRE
WASHINGTON
"As you ramble on through life, brother," goes advice on coffee shop walls, "whatever be your goal � keep your eye upon the doughnut and not upon the hole."
That wisdom is at the heart of the compromise that may be struck in a Congressional conference on a low-premium prescription drug benefit for people over 65.
In the first bite of the doughnut, a senior would pay only one-fourth of his drug costs up to about $2,000. Then comes the hole: the next $2,000 or so of costs isn't covered at all. But then the doughnut gets delicious: the senior pays only 5 percent of all costs above that. Only the poor would get a free ride, but nobody would be wiped out by the cost of catastrophic illness.
Other issues are yet to be resolved; conservatives (uncharacteristically) want high-income seniors to pay higher premiums, and liberals (typically) don't want private insurers competing with the government, offering the elderly a choice.
What bothers me in this healthy dickering is the move to encourage Americans � including governors and mayors who should know better � to buy U.S. drugs at half price or less in Canada and overseas where there are government controls on prices.
The price of most new prescription drugs is high in the U.S. mainly because it includes the producers' huge investment in scientific research. In Canada, the government strips out the cost of such research and imposes a low price ceiling. Shortsightedly, our pharmaceutical companies have meekly or greedily gone along with this foreign rip-off, picking up extra sales on a research investment already made.
But this foolish acceptance of foreign price controls means that the U.S. consumer is subsidizing the foreign consumer. Not being dopes, pursuing their economic interest, American bargain-hunters are now buying these drugs where they are sold cheaply � outside the U.S.
To counter this trend, our federal officials have been warning that imported drugs may be counterfeit or conflict with other drugs. That may scare some buyers, but most will take their chances. In reality, what with an open border and the Internet, sales will go to the cheapest seller. More Americans will join Canadians in buying drugs that do not support the cost of research into new drugs.
Thus has Phanny Pharma outsmarted itself. By willingly cutting its prices to sell into price-controlled economies, not only has it invited American buyers to go where the bargains are, but it has also invited U.S. politicians to call for foreign prices on products bought by U.S. state and local governments. And there go billions in private capital and earnings needed for costly research into new cures and treatments.
How do we stop our subsidy to foreigners that cannibalizes our home market? No new federal laws are needed to deal with this economic inequity; our drug marketers should just apply the irrevocable law of supply and demand.
The tough-minded approach: Raise overseas sales prices to include the cost of research (which should lower prices here somewhat). If the Canadian government says no, let Canadians who want our products buy direct from the U.S. via Internet or mail at the price that pays for research, as Americans do. If Canada forbids that, let its legislators answer to citizens who want prescriptions filled.
The tenderhearted approach: Our drug companies can accurately estimate the current Canadian-only prescription demand in Canada or elsewhere. They should restrict supply of those products at low prices to that level. When American purchasers compete with Canadians for that limited supply, price controls will come under pressure. Canada can then impose rationing, always unpopular in peacetime; or tolerate black markets; or lift its controls until U.S. bargain-hunters see no purpose in competing with Canadian buyers.
History continually teaches us that free markets work best. Government price controls discourage production and competition, create shortages and breed corruption. That's the lesson we're trying to teach Iraqis; why can't the pharmaceutical houses � as well as House and Senate conferees working to combine a costly new drug benefit with reform of Medicare � grasp that lesson at home?
In this, the doughnut is research-driven innovation; the hole is controls. As you ramble on through life, brother . . .
There's a Catch: Jobs
By BOB HERBERT
The president tells us the economy is accelerating, and the statistics seem to bear him out. But don't hold your breath waiting for your standard of living to improve. Bush country is not a good environment for working families.
In the real world, which is the world of families trying to pay their mortgages and get their children off to college, the economy remains troubled. While the analysts and commentators of the comfortable class are assuring us that the president's tax cuts and the billions being spent on Iraq have been good for the gross domestic product, the workaday folks are locked in a less sanguine reality.
It's a reality in which:
� The number of Americans living in poverty has increased by three million in the past two years.
� The median household income has fallen for the past two years.
� The number of dual-income families, particularly those with children under 18, has declined sharply.
The administration can spin its "recovery" any way it wants. But working families can't pay their bills with data about the gross domestic product. They need the income from steady employment. And when it comes to employment, the Bush administration has compiled the worst record since the Great Depression.
Kind of , anyway.
Whenever something happens to me, I automatically assume something I did was involved. This time, though…
There's two types of insulin I'm dealing with, regular and NPH. The NPH has something of a time-release effect, and I take it twice per day. I take the regular insulin after meals to get past the immediate blood glucose spike eating causes. I don't take very much insuling, I'm told. I just need to take it just so.
It's not always that simple, though. Some days it's like I'm more resistant to insulin than other days. And if that happens on a day where I'm out and don't have my insulin with me when I eat (say, because I just didn't expect to be out that long) I can be in for a problem. And because one's blood sugar can be somewhat high with no symptoms (say, as high as one's glucose level normally spikes after eating) I can suddenly find myself at a blood glucose level that's just not a good thing.
Libertarians Pursue New Goal: State of Their Own
By PAM BELLUCK
KEENE, N.H. -- A few things stand out about this unprepossessing city. It just broke its own Guinness Book world record for the most lighted jack-o'-lanterns with 28,952. It claims to have the world's widest Main Street.
And recently, Keene became the home of Justin Somma, a 26-year-old freelance copywriter from Suffern, N.Y., and a foot soldier in an upstart political movement. That movement, the Free State Project, aims to make all of New Hampshire a laboratory for libertarian politics by recruiting libertarian-leaning people from across the country to move to New Hampshire and throw their collective weight around. Leaders of the project figure 20,000 people would do the trick, and so far 4,960 have pledged to make the move.
The idea is to concentrate enough fellow travelers in a single state to jump-start political change. Members, most of whom have met only over the Internet, chose New Hampshire over nine other states in a heated contest that lasted months.
(The other contenders were Alaska, Delaware, Idaho, Maine, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming. One frequently asked question on the project's Web site was "Can't you make a warmer state an option?")
Once here, they plan to field candidates in elections and become active in schools and community groups, doing all they can to sow the libertarian ideals of curbing taxes, minimizing regulation of guns and drugs, privatizing schools and reducing government programs.
U.S. Case for Helping Iraq Suffers a Setback
By ALEX BERENSON
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Oct. 26 -- In purely military terms, the rocket attack Sunday morning on a hotel being used by Paul D. Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defense and a leading architect of the war against Saddam Hussein, meant little.
But the strike is a serious setback for the Bush administration as it tries to persuade the world to focus on the positives of the American occupation, on falling crime and new schools, on cleaner streets and freer speech.
Instead, it is a reminder that after easily toppling Mr. Hussein, the United States is struggling against a continuing guerrilla resistance, and struggling even though the guerrillas are badly trained and ill equipped.
But the guerrillas have two great advantages. First, the United States has been reluctant to use its full might against them, for fear of turning civilians against the occupation and inflaming public opinion worldwide.
Second, the guerrillas can win merely by creating chaos. As long as they are killing soldiers and Iraqi civilians, the Bush administration will have a difficult time convincing Americans that Iraq is becoming more stable -- and in winning the foreign investment that Iraq's economy needs.
By that score, the attack on Sunday, which killed an American colonel and wounded 16 other people, was especially damaging. Mr. Wolfowitz came to Iraq hoping to underscore the progress the administration has made, and to persuade investors to come and help Iraq rebuild. He did not back away even after he and his rattled aides were evacuated from the smoking floors of their hotel.
But the attack sent the opposite message, by underscoring the vulnerability of even the best-protected part of the capital.
Crime-facilitating speech: I'm finally finishing up a rough but distributable draft of my Crime-Facilitating Speech article. There's much that I'm not satisfied with: For instance, it's way too long (100 pages at this point), and I still don't have a clear solution to propose, though I might stick by proposing a few alternatives and explaining the pluses and minuses of each.
…When should speech be punishable because it provides information that facilitates crimes, or other harms? This question arises in many different cases:
…These are not incitement cases: The speech isn�t persuading some readers to commit bad acts. Rather, the speech helps some readers more effectively commit bad acts—acts that they already want to commit.
Surprisingly, the Supreme Court has never squarely confronted this issue, and lower courts and commentators have only recently begun to seriously face it. And getting the answer right here is quite important: Because these cases are structurally quite similar—a similarity that hasn�t been generally recognized—a decision about one of them will affect the results in others. If one of these restrictions is upheld (or struck down), others may be unexpectedly validated (or invalidated) as well.
In this article, I�ll try to analyze the problem of crime-facilitating speech, a term I define to mean
Since I don't feel like being smart I have to let someone else do it.
So has my head.
Currently feeling like shit. I let my diabetic discipline slip and I feel like this for a couple of days.
Article published Oct 21, 2003
N.C. woman killed as she tries to protect friend
A Monroe woman was killed when she was beaten over the head with a shovel as she tried to protect a friend from her estranged husband, authorities say.
Tracey Helms, 25, died Saturday in her own front yard. She was the 47th victim of domestic violence this year in North Carolina, the North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence said.
It is unclear how many were killed trying to protect someone else, but experts said she's not the first.
"Domestic violence is all about power and control," said Union County district attorney Ken Honeycutt, who has led a prosecution program to stem domestic violence. "When the abuser sees someone interfering with this ability to control, they lash out at that person."
Police said Helms became the target last week when she came between her friend Holly Wright Blount and the woman's new husband, Michael William Blount.
Blount, 27, of Monroe is being held without bond on charges of murder and second-degree kidnapping, police said. In addition to various drug convictions, Blount was convicted in 2000 of misdemeanor assault with a deadly weapon and assault on a female in an incident involving another woman, records show.
Helms and Holly Blount, friends for about four years, had worked together at various waitressing jobs.
On the evening of Oct. 15, Holly Blount called Monroe police to escort her as she picked up belongings from the Economy Inn room she had shared with her husband.
Holly Blount didn't go to a shelter or file a restraining order but moved into Helms' home. She stayed there for two nights.
Helms told her mother, who lives in Albuquerque, N.M., about her friend's situation last week.
"The first thing I said is, `Be careful. If he's been abusive, watch your kids. You don't know what he'll do,'" recalled Sherry Bower.
Experts say the most dangerous time for abuse victims is when they leave the abuser. A friend's home isn't usually a safe place to go, said Natalie Simpson, executive director of Union County's 42-bed shelter, Turning Point.
"When you go to a friend's or relative's there's nothing to stop him from coming over there," she said.
Holly Blount told police her husband was waiting behind a tree at the Helms' home, holding a shovel, after they ended their shifts about 2 a.m. Saturday.
Helms ran toward the house to get her husband and call police. Police said she was hit over the head with the shovel. Then she was hit at least once more. Police said Holly Blount was then forced into a car and driven away.
Tracey's husband, D.J. Helms, and the two children, ages 4 and 6, were asleep in the house and heard nothing, family members said. Her husband found her body after he awoke that morning.
Later that day, Blount released his wife uninjured somewhere in Lexington County, S.C. She called 911. He was arrested Saturday afternoon.
D.J. Helms said he had no idea his family was in such danger. "I probably wouldn't have let Holly stay if I'd know she'd bring danger to my household," he said Monday.
He visited Holly Blount on Monday afternoon to tell her his wife had given her a second chance to live without abuse. He wanted her to know she should take the opportunity.
"Tracey, the sweetheart she is, tends to gravitate toward the troubled people," her mother said. "She was a peacemaker. She loved to try to get peaceful endings to things."
Information from: The Charlotte Observer
Study on bad eating habits finds children under 2 eating fries, drinking soda
T.A. BADGER, Associated Press Writer
Saturday, October 25, 2003
�2003 Associated Press
(10-25) 13:30 PDT SAN ANTONIO (AP) --
Even before their second birthday, many American children are developing the same bad eating habits that plague the nation's adults -- too much fat, sugar and salt and too few fruits and vegetables.
A new study of more than 3,000 youngsters found significant numbers of infants and toddlers are downing french fries, pizza, candy and soda.
Children aged 1 to 2 years require about 950 calories per day, but the study found that the median intake for that age group is 1,220 calories, -- an excess of nearly 30 percent. For those 7 months to 11 months old, the daily caloric surplus was about 20 percent.
"By 24 months, patterns look startlingly similar to some of the problematic American dietary patterns," said an overview of the Feeding Infants & Toddlers Study, commissioned by baby-food maker Gerber Products Co.
Rockets hit hotel where Americans are based, unknown number of casualties
CHARLES J. HANLEY, AP Special Correspondent
Saturday, October 25, 2003
�2003 Associated Press
(10-25) 23:09 PDT BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) --
Six to eight rockets on Sunday struck the Al Rasheed Hotel that is home to many U.S. military and civilian employees, the U.S. military said. Preliminary, unconfirmed reports showed that one American was killed and several information, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said
Wolfowitz, appearing shaken during a hastily called news conference, expressed "profound sympathy" to victims of the attack.
Wolfowitz said that danger persists Iraq "as long as there are criminals out there staging hit and run attacks."
The 6:10 a.m. attack caused some damage to the hotel however U.S. troops prevented reporters from reaching the scene, located in a heavy guarded area near coalition headquarters.
Wolfowitz, one of the architects of the war that ousted Saddam Hussein, arrived in Iraq on Friday for a three-day visit.
He said the U.S.-led coalition was achieving success in stabilizing Iraq despite actions of "criminals who are trying to destabilize this country." He described them as "a few who refuse to accept the reality" of the new Iraq.
War on Drugs Takes a Toll on the L.A. Justice System
Limited resources could be better used elsewhere.
By Brady Sullivan
Brady Sullivan is a deputy public defender in Los Angeles.
October 25, 2003
Some members of the Los Angeles City Council are supporting a tax increase to hire more police on the grounds that the city is "seriously underpoliced."
This is simply not true.
People who work in the Los Angeles criminal justice system are well aware that the central problem with the LAPD is not a shortage of police officers but a misallocation of personnel. Instead of fully policing the most violent, gang-infested parts of the city, a vast number of officers are toiling away in the futile "war on drugs."
I think a periodic reference to that flight suit is entirely appropriate
Sunday, October 26, 2003; Page B06
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Donald H. Rumsfeld asked some tough and smart questions of his top aides in the private memo that was leaked to the press last week. At the end of his missive, he told his deputies to prepare to discuss them at an upcoming meeting. Knowing Mr. Rumsfeld's reputation as a demanding boss, we cannot help wondering how he would react if his aides served up the responses he himself has provided to Congress and the media. For example, Mr. Rumsfeld's memo argues that "we lack the metrics to know if we are winning or losing the global war on terror" and asks whether a new organization, new tactics or another presidential mandate to the intelligence community is needed. What if the answer he received was: "One could make the case that what we're doing is exactly the right thing," as Mr. Rumsfeld told the House Armed Services Committee earlier this year? Or what if, in response to his assertion that "we are having mixed results with al Qaeda," Mr. Rumsfeld's aides responded that, to the contrary, "we're finding the terrorists where they are, and we're rooting them out, and we're capturing them, we're killing them." That is what Mr. Rumsfeld said Thursday when reporters asked him about his own memo.
Surely no one who served up such thin gruel would survive long in Mr. Rumsfeld's Pentagon. Which raises the question: Why does the secretary think that is the appropriate way for him to talk to Congress and the country? For months, as security conditions have worsened in Afghanistan and as U.S. troops have fought a costly war against a stubborn resistance in Iraq, Mr. Rumsfeld's habit has been to insist in public that "the progress has been quite good," that "it's gotten better every week" and that nothing has happened that has surprised him or was not anticipated in the Pentagon's prewar planning. The stonewalling has cost him much goodwill in Congress, with even Republican committee chairmen chafing over the defense secretary's refusal to talk straight. More seriously, it risks having exactly the opposite effect from what might be intended: Faced with the gap between Mr. Rumsfeld's words and the obvious troubles in Iraq and Afghanistan, much of the public may conclude that the Bush administration has either lost touch with reality or has no clear sense of how to respond to the challenges it faces.
Democratic Hopefuls Play Down Gun Control
By Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, October 26, 2003; Page A01
MANCHESTER, N.H. -- Democratic presidential candidates are distancing themselves from tough gun control, reversing a decade of rhetoric and advocacy by the Democratic Party in favor of federal regulation of firearms.
Most Democratic White House hopefuls rarely highlight gun control in their campaigns, and none of the candidates who routinely poll near the top are calling for the licensing of new handgun owners, a central theme of then-Vice President Al Gore's winning primary campaign in 2000.
Howard Dean, the early frontrunner this year, proudly tells audiences the National Rifle Association endorsed him as governor of Vermont. As president, Dean said he would leave most gun laws to the states. The federal government, Dean said in an interview here, should not "inflict regulations" on states such as Montana and Vermont, where gun crime is not a big problem. New York and California "can have as much gun control as they want," but those states -- and not the federal government -- should make that determination, he said.
Rep. Richard A. Gephardt, a longtime gun control advocate, is careful to highlight his support for law-abiding gun owners. The Missouri Democrat said he is not interested in giving the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives more authority to investigate gun crimes, a top priority for the gun control activist. "They have enough," he said in an interview.
As a result, Democratic strategists and several of the candidates themselves predict the debate over gun laws this campaign will be less divisive. Democrats might fight for narrow proposals to make guns safer and more difficult for children and criminals to obtain, they said, yet voters are likely to hear as much about enforcing existing gun laws as creating new ones -- a position Republicans and the NRA have pushed for years.
"What you are seeing . . . is a sea change" from the 1990s, when President Bill Clinton and Gore championed several major gun laws -- and paid a big political price for it, said Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the NRA.
Evangelicals Sway White House on Human Rights Issues Abroad
By ELISABETH BUMILLER
WASHINGTON, Oct. 25 � Shortly after George W. Bush took office, an odd coalition came to the White House to see Karl Rove, the president's powerful political adviser, to ask that the United States intercede in the civil war in Sudan. The group included Charles W. Colson, the born-again Christian who spent seven months in jail for his role in Watergate, and David Saperstein, a Reform rabbi and a longtime lobbyist for liberal causes in Washington.
The two-decades-long war in Sudan was not a front-burner problem for the new administration, and Mr. Rove was not a foreign policy adviser. But the religious strife between Christians and Muslims in a conflict that had killed two million people was of enormous concern to American religious groups, particularly the evangelicals who make up a major portion of President Bush's electoral base.
Mr. Rove, the participants in the meeting recalled, was unusually receptive during a nearly hourlong conversation. "He made it clear how seriously the administration was going to engage on this," said Rabbi Saperstein, director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism.
Close to three years later, the White House has lived up to Mr. Rove's promise to engage not only in peace talks in Sudan, but on other human rights issues of critical importance to American religious groups, most notably sex trafficking and AIDS.
Administration officials and members of Congress say the religious coalition has had an unusual influence on one of the most religious White Houses in American history. The groups have driven aspects of foreign policy and won major appointments, and they were instrumental in making sure that the president included extensive remarks on sex trafficking in his speech to the United Nations General Assembly in September.
9/11 Commission Could Subpoena Oval Office Files
By PHILIP SHENON
MADISON, N.J., Oct. 25 � The chairman of the federal commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks says that the White House is continuing to withhold several highly classified intelligence documents from the panel and that he is prepared to subpoena the documents if they are not turned over within weeks.
The chairman, Thomas H. Kean, the former Republican governor of New Jersey, also said in an interview on Friday that he believed the bipartisan 10-member commission would soon be forced to issue subpoenas to other executive branch agencies because of continuing delays by the Bush administration in providing documents and other evidence needed by the panel.
"Any document that has to do with this investigation cannot be beyond our reach," Mr. Kean said on Friday in his first explicit public warning to the White House that it risked a subpoena and a politically damaging courtroom showdown with the commission over access to the documents, including Oval Office intelligence reports that reached President Bush's desk in the weeks before the Sept. 11 attacks.
"I will not stand for it," Mr. Kean said in the interview in his offices here at Drew University, where he has been president since 1990.
"That means that we will use every tool at our command to get hold of every document."
He said that while he had not directly threatened a subpoena in his recent conversations with the White House legal counsel, Alberto R. Gonzales, "it's always on the table, because they know that Congress in their wisdom gave us the power to subpoena, to use it if necessary."