Doctors Influenced By Mention Of Drug Ads
Offbeat Study Finds Familiar Brand Name Can Evoke Diagnosis
By Shankar Vedantam and Marc Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, April 27, 2005; A01
Actors
pretending to be patients with symptoms of stress and fatigue were five
times as likely to walk out of doctors' offices with a prescription
when they mentioned seeing an ad for the heavily promoted
antidepressant Paxil, according an unusual study being published today.
The
study employed an elaborate ruse -- sending actors with fake symptoms
into 152 doctors' offices to see whether they would get prescriptions.
Most who did not report symptoms of depression were not given
medications, but when they asked for Paxil, 55 percent were given
prescriptions, and 50 percent received diagnoses of depression.
The
study adds fuel to the growing controversy over the estimated $4
billion a year the drug industry spends on such advertising. Many
public health advocates have long complained about ads showing happy
people whose lives were changed by a drug, and now voices in Congress,
the Food and Drug Administration and even the pharmaceutical industry
are asking whether things have gone too far.
Nearly every industrialized country bans such advertising, and physicians said the new study raises new questions.
"It
is a haphazard approach to health promotion that is driven primarily by
the pharmaceutical industry's interest in turning a profit," said
Matthew F. Hollon, an internist at the University of Washington in
Seattle, who wrote an editorial accompanying the study in today's
Journal of the American Medical Association. "The most overlooked
problem in the health care system today is the extent to which it is
permeated by avarice."
Hollon and the researchers who conducted
the study said it was not realistic to expect such marketing to be
abolished, given the climate of deregulation in Washington. But they
said the ads should be tempered by educational messages funded by a tax
on the industry and better training of doctors, or by a moratorium on
ads for new drugs until their risks are fully known.