I must disagree with your comparison of LaShawn and
Baldilocks. Ms. Barber's reasoning is ususally convoluted and
presents evidence that usually doesn't argue her point. I haven't
read much of Baldilocks but the few posts I have read
seemed well reasoned and logical. Also, doesn't Ms.
Barber post much more emotional topics than Baldilocks?
I must disagree with your comparison of LaShawn and Baldilocks. Ms. Barber's reasoning is ususally convoluted and presents evidence that usually doesn't argue her point. I haven't read much of Baldilocks but the few posts I have read seemed well reasoned and logical. Also, doesn't Ms. Barber post much more emotional topics than Baldilocks?