Not that I'm a feminist blogger or anything

by Prometheus 6
September 20, 2005 - 3:06pm.
on Health | Race and Identity

I just feel you ought to be paying attention to the people most affected by thangs...which in this case, doesn't include anyone with a penis.

Feminist Bloggers Say No to John Roberts
by Liza Sabater

To members of the Judiciary Committee and the Senate:

We are a group of writers who are passionately committed to supporting women's basic freedom as citizens of the United States. We are appealing to you as free citizens dedicated to political growth, fairness and the spirit of Liberty guaranteed in the US Constitution.

We are not paid pundits or political operatives. We are concerned citizens who represent the diversity of the United States: women and men, straight and gay, single and married, religious and atheist, of different races, religions and ethnicities. Some of us are even parents even after having abortions. And we all blog because we have to.

We have taken to this citizen media to create communities of hope. In our blogs people rant and rave, discuss and debate to share the one thing we all agree about : The United States Constitution is about creating common ground among the many, not limiting freedom for the benefit of the few.

Yes, the battle for the Supreme Court is about the right to privacy.

Yes, the battle for the Supreme Court is about civil rights.

Yes, the battle for the Supreme Court is about state rights.

Yet what is at stake in the the reconfiguration of the Supreme Court, is the fundamental right to freedom for all peoples living under the Bill of Rights and unenumerated rights retained by the people. Roberts' has consistently opposed the interests of the people in his career. The decisions, dissents and legal documents that have been released for scrutiny point to the man's willingness to find ways to use technicalities to curtail freedom and not expand it. Although it would be easy to demonstrate this willingness through his involvement in cases dealing with reproductive rights, it is the following three cases that show a road map to what could happen to the US Constitution under a Chief Justice Roberts :

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by liza Sabater (not verified) on September 20, 2005 - 11:52pm.

Word up Earl! 

Thanks for the reblog. It's a pretty long document. I hope people read the whole thing because, I do believe it is important for the penis-sporting crowd as well. This is about FREEDOM. We all know where bondage and slavery got us here, don't we?
Submitted by Quaker in a Basement on September 21, 2005 - 5:54pm.

"the penis-sporting crowd"?

Haw.

Submitted by Ourstorian on September 22, 2005 - 1:57pm.

Patrick Leahy has announced he is voting for Roberts' nomination, thus paving the way for a horde of spineless Democrats to do the same. The drums say Roberts confirmation is a done deal. I don't doubt it. But I'll be watching to see which Democrats, other than Kennedy, have the balls to vote no.

Obama, I'm watching you son!