Rooting for the bad guys

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on October 24, 2005 - 1:31pm.
on Politics

Republicans Testing Ways to Blunt Leak Charges
By RICHARD W. STEVENSON and DAVID JOHNSTON

...allies of the White House have quietly been circulating talking points in recent days among Republicans sympathetic to the administration, seeking to help them make the case that bringing charges like perjury mean the prosecutor does not have a strong case, one Republican with close ties to the White House said Sunday.

Doesn't mean there was no crime. 

Other people sympathetic to Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby have said that indicting them would amount to criminalizing politics and that Mr. Fitzgerald did not understand how Washington works.

If a crime was committed, THAT was what "criminalized politics." Perjury is a crime. Obstruction of justice is a crime.

Some Republicans have also been reprising a theme that was often sounded by Democrats during the investigations into President Bill Clinton, that special prosecutors and independent counsels lack accountability and too often pursue cases until they find someone to charge.

That's pretty shameless...

Congressional Republicans have also been...seeking to cast the leak case as an inside-the-Beltway phenomenon of little interest to most voters.

That was David Brooks all weekend, too.

As I see it, pre-positioning all these excuses means

  1. they know there was at least one crime
  2. they are in on the cover-up conspiracy
That's all.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by ptcruiser on October 24, 2005 - 5:25pm.

Patrick Fitzgerald knows exactly how Washington works. And if he didn 't know before he accepted the assignment of being a special prosecutor then he certainly knows by now how things there work. I am no admirer of Bill Clinton but if he could be endlessly harrassed, trashed and impeached for lying to a grand jury about having an extramarital affair then these boys, who probably loved every minute of Clinton's torture, can put up with being investigated for leaking the name of a CIA covert operative. If they haven't or don't believe they have committed a crime then they should step to the plate (don't these boys love baseball metaphors) and come clean. It will save all of us time and money.

Submitted by fullnelson on October 25, 2005 - 5:48pm.

Breaking the law is still a crime, even if done in the name of "politics."  Had Nixon stood trial for his crimes, it would have been a stark warning to future politicians who think they're slick enough to use criminal means to accomplish political ends.  (Think about it this way:  Mafiosi  use criminal means to accomplish capitalist ends, but it sure don't make what they do legal.)  Fitzgerald doesn't have to know about politics; it's more than sufficient that he knows the law.  I just hope he has all the integrity his supporters say he has, because I have a feeling he's caught some powerful men in some horrible mischief.

Submitted by Natalie Davis on October 25, 2005 - 7:01pm.

"As I see it, pre-positioning all these excuses means

1. they know there was at least one crime
2. they are in on the cover-up conspiracy"

Spot on. At the very least, Libby should be indicted, but I sense that many more people have soiled hands.