A Question of Influence

Submitted by Temple3 on February 1, 2006 - 12:44pm.
Pardon my lack of introspection on the question, but here it is. Canada is the leading exporter of petro to the US but appears to wield none of the political influence of nations like Saudi Arabia. What are some of the geo-political and historical factors informing this apparent disparity? Thanks.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Prometheus 6 on February 1, 2006 - 4:32pm.
It's probably because everyone considers this half of the planet the property of the USofA at least since the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Submitted by Ourstorian on February 1, 2006 - 4:51pm.

According to the Canadian government, Canada has only been the leading oil exporter to the US since 2004 (17% of petrol imports and 10% of US consumption in 2004). As a "geographic region," the Persian Gulf supplies more oil (19.8% in 2004). But OPEC members supply the lion's share (40% in 2004). OPEC includes Venezuela and Indonesia, which are outside the Persian Gulf. Of all the oil suppliers, Canada is the most dependent on the US market.

Relations between the two countries have been chilly of late for several reasons: Canada declined to participate in Bush's fantasy missle shield program; Canada did not send troops to Iraq; US tariffs on Canadian lumber hurt their industry; and the ban on Canadian beef imports due to a mad cow disease scare haven't helped matters either. The previous Prime Minister, Paul Martin, was making moves to break Canada's dependency on the US oil market by seeking to supply China. His party lost the recent elections, but the new guy from the Conservative Party probably won't last long.

Canada is a major player in the US economy. But as to why they are treated like Rodney Dangerfield I don't know. Also, there's something fishy about the numbers in the Congressional Research Service Report linked above. CRS shows Great Britain is #1 investor in the US and Japan is #2. But in February 2002, the Washington Post estimated the Saudis had between 500 - 700 billion invested in the US. I believe Michael Moore also addressed this in Fahrenheit 9/11. If true, that's more than Britain, Japan and Germany (the purported top three) combined.

Submitted by Ourstorian on February 1, 2006 - 4:51pm.
Sorry for the messy appearance of the above. I couldn't get the formatting to work.
Submitted by Temple3 on February 1, 2006 - 5:21pm.

Didn't the lumber dispute amount to roughly $10 billion. I thought I read somewhere. That makes sense. I thought it was something to that effect. Canada is in a rough spot because of their geographic isolation from other nations. Ridin' B_. Oh well.
Submitted by Prometheus 6 on February 1, 2006 - 10:24pm.
Sorry for the messy appearance of the above. I couldn't get the formatting to work.

That's because I'm a pinhead. I clicked the wrong box and made the editor available to anonymous users instead of registered ones.
Submitted by Temple3 on February 2, 2006 - 8:26am.

No wonder it hasn't been working. It's cool. Stuff happens.

Post new comment

*
*
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*