Tell me again the DNC and DLC aren't the same

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on February 14, 2006 - 12:19pm.
on Politics

Quote of note:

Mr. Hackett said he was unwilling to run for the Congressional seat because he had given his word to three Democratic candidates that he would not enter that race.

"The party keeps saying for me not to worry about those promises because in politics they are broken all the time," said Mr. Hackett, who plans to return to his practice as a lawyer in the Cincinnati area. "I don't work that way. My word is my bond."

Popular Ohio Democrat Drops Out of Race, and Perhaps Politics
By IAN URBINA

Paul Hackett, an Iraq war veteran and popular Democratic candidate in Ohio's closely watched Senate contest, said yesterday that he was dropping out of the race and leaving politics altogether as a result of pressure from party leaders.

Mr. Hackett said Senators Charles E. Schumer of New York and Harry Reid of Nevada, the same party leaders who he said persuaded him last August to enter the Senate race, had pushed him to step aside so that Representative Sherrod Brown, a longtime member of Congress, could take on Senator Mike DeWine, the Republican incumbent.

Mr. Hackett staged a surprisingly strong Congressional run last year in an overwhelmingly Republican district and gained national prominence for his scathing criticism of the Bush administration's handling of the Iraq War. It was his performance in the Congressional race that led party leaders to recruit him for the Senate race.

But for the last two weeks, he said, state and national Democratic Party leaders have urged him to drop his Senate campaign and again run for Congress.

"This is an extremely disappointing decision that I feel has been forced on me," said Mr. Hackett, whose announcement comes two days before the state's filing deadline for candidates. He said he was outraged to learn that party leaders were calling his donors and asking them to stop giving and said he would not enter the Second District Congressional race.

"For me, this is a second betrayal," Mr. Hackett said. "First, my government misused and mismanaged the military in Iraq, and now my own party is afraid to support candidates like me."

Mr. Hackett was the first Iraq war veteran to seek national office, and the decision to steer him away from the Senate race has surprised those who see him as a symbol for Democrats who oppose the war but want to appear strong on national security.

"Alienating Hackett is not just a bad idea for the party, but it also sends a chill through the rest of the 56 or so veterans that we've worked to run for Congress," said Mike Lyon, executive director for the Band of Brothers, a group dedicated to electing Democratic veterans to national office. "Now is a time for Democrats to be courting, not blocking, veterans who want to run."

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by ptcruiser on February 15, 2006 - 2:56pm.
I'm sorry to disappoint you but they are the same.  If Sherrod Brown has amassed $2.7 million in campaign contributions then we can take book that it came from the same folks, by and large, who support Mike DeWine.  The Democrats don't really want anybody who will speak truth to power. The Republicans seem to be comfortable with running allegedly populist candidates who have no previous track record as elected officials and they knock off Democratic officeholders. When the Democrats are presented with a similar opportunity they blanch and run as fast as they can from their own candidate.

The Democrats are afraid to win an election.
Submitted by GDAWG on February 15, 2006 - 3:16pm.
Could it be that the Democarats are not afraid of winning elections because they are actually closeted Republicans in mind and spirit? That is, their goal goals are really republican in nature but merely serve as a "trojan horse" of sort, within the democratic party itself, so as to obfuscate the will and desires of the real opposition. Check out some of the positions they have taken: the Bankruptcy Bill, The Iraqi War; Drug legislation_ eg, Crack penalities versus Meth penalties, Nafta,....................... 
Submitted by ptcruiser on February 15, 2006 - 3:24pm.
I don't think they are closeted Republicans. I think something worse has occurred: they have forgotten what it means to be Democrats.

Post new comment

*
*
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*