Opposition?

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on February 16, 2006 - 8:07am.
on War

Still no sign of concern about the police force with power to arrest anyone on mere suspicion.

...virtually every senator who had stood with Feingold last year to kill a House-Senate agreement abandoned the effort this month after two of them, both Republicans, struck a deal with the White House to add more privacy protections.

..."Sometimes cosmetics will make a beauty out of a beast and provide enough cover for senators to change their vote," Specter told reporters Wednesday.

Patriot Act Moves Ahead Despite Opposition
By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer
Thu Feb 16, 4:45 AM ET

The USA Patriot Act is headed toward renewal with broad Senate support for a White House-brokered compromise that adds modest new civil liberties protections to the terror-fighting law.

"The outcome here is absolutely predetermined," Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said late Wednesday. "It's going to pass with overwhelming support."

With even senior Democrats lining up behind the measure, its lone opponent, Sen. Russell Feingold, was preparing amendments he said would strengthen its curbs on government power. Congress is racing to renew 16 provisions of the law that are set to expire March 10.

During the process, Feingold, D-Wis., was trying to attach an amendment to set a four-year expiration date on the use of National Security Letters — demands for records issued by administrators — under the Patriot Act, according to a spokesman.

Another amendment would require the government to notify the subject of a secret search within seven days or obtain court permission to maintain the secrecy for a longer period, rather than the 30-day requirement in the legislation being considered.

While the filibuster was a lone endeavor, Feingold had plenty of company in wanting the 2001 anti-terrorism law to include more curbs on the government's power to investigate people.

The bill's sponsor, Sen. Arlen Specter (news, bio, voting record), R-Pa., said a full makeover was unlikely to pass Congress before March 10.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Semi-Anonymous (not verified) on February 17, 2006 - 7:05am.
Since Bush has claimed that as CIC he has unlimited powers, why does he need the Patriot Act. The PA is just legislation and since Bush is not bound by any acts of Congress its just a waste of time. We could be using that tax money to send Congress home and buy George and Dick red velvet robes and diamond encrusted crowns.

Post new comment

*
*
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*