Fat chance

Digby suggests a test to see if the Christian Right's defense of "Judge" Roy Moore is sincere:

Their argument is that religious speech in general, not just Christianity, has been banished from state institutions and that this perverts the founders intention which was that America should be a country of religious pluralism not secularism.

…The next time a Judge Roy Moore wants to install the Ten Commandments in his courtroom or some high school senior wants to lead the school in a prayer I would encourage several people of different faiths to demand that their religion be treated no differently and observed in exactly the same manner. I think it might be especially helpful if Muslims, Buddhists, Rastafarians and Scientologists waged this fight since they represent a variety of ways in which American politics? new public embrace of religion might be tested.

…let?s put the establishment clause to the test. If Judge Roy Moore would not object to having a statue of Heile Selassie next to his monument or a bunch of Hare Krishna?s selling books in the lobby of the courthouse, then I suppose I couldn?t really argue with his sincerity in making the claim that he?s not trying to unconstitutionally establish Christianity as the state religion.

If he does object then I think we?ll know that his agenda is really to establish his religion as the legitimate religious voice associated with the state. And, that is exactly what the establishment clause was designed to prevent.

Posted by Prometheus 6 on September 16, 2003 - 2:26am :: News