I'm winding up Slavery by Another Name; review should show up some time Saturday. And both Buried in Bitter Waters and Sundown Towns is en route.
Since I was working them, I decided I might as well start on my own whiteness studies. I first suggested studying whiteness on the dial-up BBS networks over 20 years ago, but I envisioned nothing like what actually developed. I believe collegiate level whiteness studies are deeply flawed by their focus on white privilege rather than white identity.
So I got some books on white identity...southern white identity at that...courtesy of Princeton University Press. I'm going to start withThe Silent Majority, because I...get the feeling I won't agree with the other two.
The Silent Majority
Suburban Politics in the Sunbelt South
Matthew D. Lassiter
Suburban sprawl transformed the political culture of the American South as much as the civil rights movement did during the second half of the twentieth century. The Silent Majority provides the first regionwide account of the suburbanization of the South from the perspective of corporate leaders, political activists, and especially of the ordinary families who lived in booming Sunbelt metropolises such as Atlanta, Charlotte, and Richmond.
Matthew Lassiter examines crucial battles over racial integration, court-ordered busing, and housing segregation to explain how the South moved from the era of Jim Crow fully into the mainstream of national currents. During the 1960s and 1970s, the grassroots mobilization of the suburban homeowners and school parents who embraced Richard Nixon's label of the Silent Majority reshaped southern and national politics and helped to set in motion the center-right shift that has dominated the United States ever since.
The Silent Majority traces the emergence of a "color-blind" ideology in the white middle-class suburbs that defended residential segregation and neighborhood schools as the natural outcomes of market forces and individual meritocracy rather than the unconstitutional products of discriminatory public policies. Connecting local and national stories, and reintegrating southern and American history, The Silent Majority is critical reading for those interested in urban and suburban studies, political and social history, the civil rights movement, public policy, and the intersection of race and class in modern America.
In Search of Another Country
Mississippi and the Conservative Counterrevolution
Joseph Crespino
In the 1960s, Mississippi was the heart of white southern resistance to the civil-rights movement. To many, it was a backward-looking society of racist authoritarianism and violence that was sorely out of step with modern liberal America. White Mississippians, however, had a different vision of themselves and their country, one so persuasive that by 1980 they had become important players in Ronald Reagan's newly ascendant Republican Party.
In this ambitious reassessment of racial politics in the deep South, Joseph Crespino reveals how Mississippi leaders strategically accommodated themselves to the demands of civil-rights activists and the federal government seeking to end Jim Crow, and in so doing contributed to a vibrant conservative countermovement. Crespino explains how white Mississippians linked their fight to preserve Jim Crow with other conservative causes--with evangelical Christians worried about liberalism infecting their churches, with cold warriors concerned about the Communist threat, and with parents worried about where and with whom their children were schooled. Crespino reveals important divisions among Mississippi whites, offering the most nuanced portrayal yet of how conservative southerners bridged the gap between the politics of Jim Crow and that of the modern Republican South.
This book lends new insight into how white Mississippians gave rise to a broad, popular reaction against modern liberalism that recast American politics in the closing decades of the twentieth century.
White Flight
Atlanta and the Making of Modern Conservatism
Kevin M. Kruse
During the civil rights era, Atlanta thought of itself as "The City Too Busy to Hate," a rare place in the South where the races lived and thrived together. Over the course of the 1960s and 1970s, however, so many whites fled the city for the suburbs that Atlanta earned a new nickname: "The City Too Busy Moving to Hate."
In this reappraisal of racial politics in modern America, Kevin Kruse explains the causes and consequences of "white flight" in Atlanta and elsewhere. Seeking to understand segregationists on their own terms, White Flight moves past simple stereotypes to explore the meaning of white resistance. In the end, Kruse finds that segregationist resistance, which failed to stop the civil rights movement, nevertheless managed to preserve the world of segregation and even perfect it in subtler and stronger forms.
Challenging the conventional wisdom that white flight meant nothing more than a literal movement of whites to the suburbs, this book argues that it represented a more important transformation in the political ideology of those involved. In a provocative revision of postwar American history, Kruse demonstrates that traditional elements of modern conservatism, such as hostility to the federal government and faith in free enterprise, underwent important transformations during the postwar struggle over segregation. Likewise, white resistance gave birth to several new conservative causes, like the tax revolt, tuition vouchers, and privatization of public services. Tracing the journey of southern conservatives from white supremacy to white suburbia, Kruse locates the origins of modern American politics.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
Uh, difference?
I believe collegiate level whiteness studies are deeply flawed by their focus on white privilege rather than white identity.
There's a difference?
I think so...at minimum
I think so...at minimum there's a difference in the way you teach it. White priviledge lessons are to to make white folks see what they don't see/admit to. White identity lessons would be about what they believe that makes them feel entitled more than what the entitlements are.
I also think white studies should include marketing and management lessons.
Slim
That's a slim difference, but I think I see it.
I'm working on ways to be
I'm working on ways to be clearer about it. No guarantees, but the book reviews will be correct.
I recently read the Silent Majority
I recently read the *Silent Majority* also. It's a bit of a grind, but the first couple of paragraphs are really good. I think in your case, it won't reveal very much that you didn't already know.
Here's my review
__________________________________
The distinction between White identity and White privilege: I've been meaning to write about this at my Wiki, and it seems to me that P6's explanation is pretty hard to beat. Just reflecting on how I would put it:
WHITE IDENTITY: In the system of racist social relations under which we live, White identity is the propellant, or engine. "Whiteness" (as opposed to the neutral "European-ness") represents a racialist category, a specific role in a colonial system; "European" merely refers to one's ethnic origins. Black identity is defined in relationship to White: it represents a very peculiar form of subaltern status (once again, "African" or even "Bantu"* are/were academically neutral) in which the subaltern is supposed to be comparable to Caliban.
Whiteness is defined as the order-bringer and redeemer of Nature.
Hence,
WHITE PRIVILEGE: From the identity, a finite number of social relations into which White people (with other characteristics, like educational attainment or property, sex, and so on) automatically step into merely by showing up. In most cases, all social roles are defined by privilege of some kind.
__________________________________
*Bantu: used to refer to the Niger-Congolese family of languages; racialist bureaucrats in the RSA applied the term "Bantu" to designate the ethnicity whose members are most likely to speak a N-C language, but naturally it was also applied in practice to Khoisan-speaking peoples like Nelson Mandela. Understandably, the term "Bantu" is now not recommended for scholarly use.
A bit academic for my
A bit academic for my purposes. But I would be interested if you get to write about it.
As I said, I chose Silent Majority as the first book as it represents a gentler slope into perdition
. The other two books got awards form sources whose comfort makes me a bit uncomfortable. In Search Of Another Country won the McLemore Prize for the best Mississippi history book of 2007, White Flight won the 2007 Best Book Award, Urban Politics Section, American Political Science Association the 2007 Francis B. Simkins Award, Southern Historical Association and the 2007 Malcolm Bell, Jr., and Muriel Barrow Bell Award for the best book in Georgia history, Georgia Historical Society. Serious academic props but the tradition of Dixie denial makes me a bit suspicious of race-related commentaries of which they approve.And I'm willing to be proven wrong, but to be honest the way I approach this stuff probably makes that more difficult.
I'll tell you though...this
I'll tell you though...this book draws me like a snake draws in a bird.
P6, that does seem
P6, that does seem intriguing. I'm going to pre-order it. I would like to bring this to your attention.
James, are you an economist? And if so, did you read The Wages of Destruction by Adam Tooze.
Cripes, man. Not only does
Cripes, man. Not only does that book look interesting and useful, the publisher's catalog is chock full of goodness.
I used to use an Amazon wish list to keep track of such stuff. I may have to do that again.
Submariner Looks like a
Submariner
Looks like a provocative read. It will be a good companion piece to P Jospeh's book coming out next year, From Black Power to Barack Obama.
Yes, I am an economist
Yes, I am an economist.
No, I have not read The Wages of Destruction... YET.
Thanks for the tip. That's absolutely brilliant. I cannot begin to tell you how well-aimed that recommendation is. You bet I'm going to read it.