Thought processes

by Prometheus 6
November 15, 2003 - 4:18pm.
on About me, not you

As you know, P6's motto is

Do not make the mistake of thinking that because my conclusion is the same as another person's that my reasoning is the same

In general, I feel that's more warning than anyone I don't know deserves, and people who know me (whether they like me or not) already understand it.

Well, in the comments to Seriously TroublingI got this response to something I said:

As for this:

Open your eyes. This coming from someone--me--who you KNOW is reasonable.

Except when you aren't reasonable, right? As I understand it, you are reasonable until you read something that pisses you off enought that you don't care if it is true or not, right?

Obviously we're talking social and psychological phenomena, not physics or math.

I thought about it, and the person who said this has been hanging tough and I feel deserves an actual explanation of the thought processes. The response is here instead of the comments just 'cuz.

It's been said that you can't reason a person out of a position they didn't reason themselves into. The fact is, all of us have positions we didn't reason ourselves into. I'm pretty aware of which positions I hold that were not reasoned into, and it'll be harder than hell to move me out of them.

It is possible, though. You have to present me with information I didn't have before or prove it more likely that things operate differently than I understand them to. If your explanation is no more likely than mine, I see no reason to give mine up. And if I see you feel my explanation is no more likely than yours and you choose to not accept mine, I won't dispute you much further.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.prometheus6.org/trackback/2274

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by mark safranski (not verified) on November 15, 2003 - 5:36pm.

Ahhh, I still agree that you are reasonable Prom - when you are wrong it's usually for a good reason :o)

Submitted by suburban blight (not verified) on November 17, 2003 - 1:22am.

Trackback from suburban blight:

Good morning, and welcome to this edition of the Cul-de-Sac, my semi-regular labor of loving linkage, in which I attempt to gauge the zeitgeist of my corner of the blogosphere. This is the first Sac in several weeks; I've been......