The difference, of course, is that the country entered a recession exactly one year ago, at least according to the Business Cycle Dating Committee, which is made up of seven prominent economists, most from the academic sector. The group made their official announcement on Monday that the economy entered a recession in December 2007.
“A recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in production, employment, real income, and other indicators,” the members said in a statement. “A recession begins when the economy reaches a peak of activity and ends when the economy reaches its trough.”
What about this nonsense about a recession being two quarters of reduced economic activity. If the recession started in December 2007, why didn't we hear this judgement six months ago?
In fact, I have another question: did the Fed know how weak Citibank was when they agreed to finance Citibank's attempt to buy Wachovia for firesale prices? Because that would indicate to me that Paulson and his boys are judging the fitness of financial firms by their names rather than their balance sheets.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
2nd Question, First
Paulson and company are all a part of the same circle. They are covering they boyz backs.
For some reason, recessions are always called months after it's started.
"For some reason, recessions
"For some reason, recessions are always called months after it's started."
Thats because they don't want the people to know how really shitty the economy is. They need people to think it's doing better than it really is to maintain faith in capitalism.
Especially when an election
Especially when an election is coming up.