Site logo

Prometheus 6

All respect and no restraint

It wasn't, and isn't, just Congress

I once had a conversation with a doctor about marijuana legalization, and drug legalization in general. My point was illegal drug are profitable enough to fund wars (see Iran-Contra and the current state of affairs in Mexico, in addition to domestic urban warfare) solely because they are illegal, and that anyone who wants drugs can get them...full stop. His point was, and I quote, "But that would be giving in!" He never was able to answer when I asked, "Giving in to what? You're giving in to an epidemic of death this way."

Righting a Wrong, Much Too Late

Public health advocates held an understandably muted celebration when President Obama signed a bill repealing a 21-year-old ban on federal financing for programs that supply clean needles to drug addicts.

The bill brought an end to a long and bitter struggle between the public health establishment — which knew from the beginning that the ban would cost lives — and ideologues in Congress who had closed their eyes to studies showing that making clean needles available to addicts slowed the rate of infection from H.I.V., the virus that causes AIDS, without increasing drug use.

But the shift in policy comes too late for the tens of thousands of Americans — drug addicts and their spouses, lovers and unborn children — who have died from AIDS and AIDS-related diseases. Many of these people would not have become infected had Congress followed sound medical advice and embraced the use of clean needles.

Congress voted to withhold federal money in 1988, at the very height of the AIDS epidemic. Back then, life in AIDS epicenters like New York and San Francisco had begun to resemble one long funeral, made all the more tragic by the fact that most of the dead were young people who should have had many more years to live.

I can well remember that

I can well remember that when this proposal was made in my hometown, San Francisco, an influential group of older black partisans made sure that it didn't happen. They were absolutely convinced that a needle exchange program would encourage drug usage and, therefore, was a muted form of genocide. There was no reasoning with them and they looked askance at any scientific studies that demonstrated the efficacy of needle exchange. They meant well but they had absolutely no idea of what they were talking about. I went to high school with some folks who might still be alive if there had been a needle exchange program.

BTW, this entire thing about

BTW, this entire thing about marijuana, IMHO, is nothing more than an effort to control the consciousness, feelings and thoughts of other people. That has been my view for five decades.

This site best viewed with a jaundiced eye