In the news

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 1, 2004 - 8:31am.
on News

Riverbend at Baghdad Burning

I get really tired of the emails deriding Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya for their news coverage, telling me they're too biased towards Arabs, etc. Why is it ok for CNN to be completely biased towards Americans and BBC to be biased towards the British but Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya have to objective and unprejudiced and, preferably, pander to American public opinion? They are Arab news networks- they SHOULD be biased towards Arabs. I agree that there is quite a bit of anti-America propaganda in some Arabic media, but there is an equal, if not more potent, amount of anti-Arab, anti-Muslim propaganda in American media. The annoying thing is that your average Arab knows much more about American culture and history than the average American knows about Arabs and Islam.

I wish everyone could see Al-Hurra- the new 'unbiased' news network started by the Pentagon and currently being broadcast all over the Arab world. It is the visual equivalent of Sawa- the American radio station which was previously the Voice of America. The news and reports are so completely biased, they only lack George Bush and Condi Rice as anchors. We watch the reports and news briefs and snicker… it is far from subtle. Interestingly enough, Asa'ad Abu Khalil said that Sawa and Al-Hurra are banned inside of America due to some sort of law that doesn't allow the broadcast of blatant political propaganda or something to that effect. I'd love to know more about that.

A channel like Al-Hurra may be able to convince Egyptians, for example, that everything is going great inside of Iraq, but how are you supposed to convince Iraqis of that? Just because they broadcast it hourly, it doesn't make it true. I sometimes wonder how Americans would feel if the Saudi government, for example, suddenly decided to start broadcasting an English channel with Islamic propaganda to Americans.

Important note to those of you who are going to email me: The last few days, I have received at least 3 emails saying, "I read your blog and don't agree with what you say but we have a famous saying in America- I don't agree with what you say but I'll die for your right to say it." Just a note- it's not your famous American saying, it is French and it is Voltaire's famous saying:"I do not agree with a word you say, but I will fight to the death for your right to say it."

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Mr.Murder (not verified) on March 2, 2004 - 9:41pm.

Thanks for making such known prom! I ended some Frenchbashing by some accent-challenged Republiclowns backers,after mentioning their workweek started overtime at 35 hours.
Most large retailers now aim for 32.5 hours after this model in France here already. productivity is up so much we could do so, I sent suggestion to Draft Clark for such. The trend would be then to hire more people and diversify payroll, and the side affect would be lower insurance premiums from greater pooled resources.

A win-win situation when you consider single parnets get overtime pay or are given time off enough to raise kids. Singles can secure other jobs/school time around such plans in better fashion as well.

Submitted by Mr.Murder (not verified) on March 7, 2004 - 12:17am.

Sorry about the typos...