A foolish consistancy

I find this amazing. But maybe I'm easily amazed.

OPEC Production Cut Could Send Gas Prices Higher
By John Burgess
Washington Post Foreign Service
Wednesday, March 31, 2004; 5:12 PM

BERLIN, March 31 -- The OPEC countries agreed Wednesday to proceed with a 4 percent cut in oil production beginning Thursday, turning aside criticism from industrial countries that any resulting price rise will harm the world economy.

With oil prices emerging as an election year issue, the White House called the move disappointing and said that administration officials were "actively engaged" with OPEC governments about it.

Oil ministers from the 11 member states, meeting in Vienna, upheld a February decision to cut production by 2.5 million barrels a day on grounds of avoiding a price-deflating build-up of oil supplies in world markets. But some oil industry analysts said any price rises could be blunted by drops in demand as warmer weather arrives and by continued cheating on official quotas as member countries try to maximize their incomes while prices remain near 13-year highs.

Following news of the decision, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said that "producers should not take steps that harm American consumers and our economy." President Bush has not called OPEC leaders about the issue, McClellan said, but officials in his administration are in touch.

And what is the administration's reaction to this?

As gasoline prices have risen to record levels, John Kerry, the presumptive Democratic candidate for president, has increasingly been citing oil in his campaign appearances. On Tuesday, he said that Bush had "done nothing with OPEC to reduce the gas prices." Bush criticized Democrats as planning higher gas taxes.

Bush criticized Democrats as planning higher gas taxes.

That about says it all for this administration.

Posted by Prometheus 6 on March 31, 2004 - 6:16pm :: News
 
 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Assuming the nation were in a reasonable fiscal position, the economicaly orthodox way to respond to this situation would be a tax on gas at the pump, accompanied by a tax credit equal to the tax. The goal is to put consumers-taxpayers on a similar level of utility, but with lower consumption of the taxed good.

Posted by  James R MacLean (not verified) on April 2, 2004 - 8:54pm.

I honestly don't think they thought it through that far. I think it's reflexive rhetoric on their part. Truthfully, the same economic principles they defend (or present as self-defense) advise usage taxes in cases like this.

More hypocrisy.

Posted by  P6 (not verified) on April 3, 2004 - 6:57pm.

Well, since you know what a loyal fan I am of this administration...

I don't think it's hypocrisy, any more than usual populist rhetoric is hypocrisy; it's merely silly. I recall in 2000, VP Gore propsed releaseing petrol from the strategic petroleum reserve to prevent an oil shortage and was shouted down as shortsighted or pandering. If it were up to me, I would have made an announcement long before that huge redundant federally-controlled reserves of most things shall be used to maintain stable prices.

But that's another subject.

I recall the flurry of letters to newspapers, mostly the ones from conservatives accusing Gore of pandering. Now, I don't want to tar Republicans as silly, but a lot of the ones who are not--shall we say--economic junkies--who had not drunk deeply of basic economics--argued that the appropriate response was to lower taxes on gasoline so that the price would be the same. Then, usually some appeal was was made to patriotism to reduce consumption.

A lot of people like my mother, who is extremely naive and good-hearted--and devoutly Republican--reason like this.

Posted by  James R MacLean (not verified) on April 3, 2004 - 7:44pm.

Look, pal, I been on a real roll with the partisan ranting and I DON'T appreciate your forcing me to be rational.

:-)

Yes, lack of information about how the process works is a big obstacle to getting an agreement on the proper road to take. Truth is, before my little economics self-study course began I wouldn't even HAVE a real opinion on "what next."

Posted by  P6 (not verified) on April 3, 2004 - 9:09pm.