You can't just say stuff like that

Even if you're anonymous, I still have to bring this one up from the comments.



There are a couple of things I want to get off my chest about this Bill Cosby stuff and I guess here is an OK place for that.

First, doing well in school is supposedly "acting white". That was not the case in any of the mostly white high school and college I went to and it was not the case in the all black elementary or junior high schools I went to.

Being a nerd is being a nerd, acting white is acting white. Two different things. It was real easy in the 80s and 90s and probably still. If you listened to hip-hop you acted black, otherwise you acted white.

More directly, if you hung out with other black kids you act black. If you hang out with white kids you act white. How complex can that be? The single smartest black person in the school in my experiences has always acted black. Maybe that's just luck.

I can imagine a circumstance where there are schools that are nearly all white in the "top classes" and nearly all black in the "bottom classes". In that situation, the smartest black kids mostly hang out with their white classmates, listen to rock and roll like their friends and are accused of "acting white". I've never seen this but I imagine that is the case in some places. In that case doing well in school happens to align well enough with acting white that there are black children complaining to adults that they are accused of "acting white" just because they do well. Those complaints seem to have reached Bill Cosby. But the fact is the kids accused of "acting white" really do "act white".

So enough of that. I think this stuff about doing well is acting white is a myth produced by distorted perceptions. Cosby and other critics of black people latched onto it just because it fits their theories that the culture of black children is to blame for everything.

The next issue is that supposedly moral standards have degraded since when Bill Cosby was a child.

How is this supposed to have happened? Did the culture fairy sprinkle dust on a whole generation of black children?

Cosby points to a school in Brooklyn with a 50% drop out rate. Seems to me that between older siblings and older friends, people who attend that school have a clear picture of what happens to the people who graduate and what happens to the people who do not graduate.

Do the 50% who graduate get better jobs than the 50% who do not graduate? It is possible that graduating is in some cases rationally not worth the aggravation.

Something has to have changed if drop out rates increased. It was not the culture fairy. Instead of blaming the children Cosby should be asking has the amount of stress involved in going to school increased for some people? Have the benefits of finishing decreased for some people? These are issues that can and should be addressed. When cultures change, they usually change for a reason.

Next. Black leaders. Bill Cosby is not one. You may not like Farrakhan or Sharpton or Jackson, but they have devoted their working lives to trying to improve the status of the Black community. Bill Cosby has spent his working life trying to make people laugh, and mostly white people at that. That does not mean its not possible that as a fluke, the comedian might have some insight that those who dedicate their lives have missed, but we don't expect that to happen. That sure hasn't happened here.

Whew. Let's get back to the work ethic for a second. My grandmother moved from Mississippi to New York City at the beginning of the 20th century to work. My grandfather moved from Barbados to New York City to work. My other grandparents moved from Georgia to Detroit to work.

Every black person in every major US city has the same story. At one point I believe the Black participation in the labor force was higher than the white participation. So what happened to the work ethic?

Its not the culture fairy. If employers are prejudiced against Black people, that lowers the expected return from a given amount of job seeking effort. The problem is not backwards pants. Any rational actor will expend less effort seeking a job if there is a lower expected reward. Instead of fixing the backwards pants, let's fix the expected reward from a given amount of effort looking for a job.

OK. I'm done. Thanks P6 for providing a forum where I can spit this out.

Does everyone know about Geoffrey Canada? I read his autobiography recently Fists Sticks Knives Guns. Its real good. Geoffrey runs a major program in Harlem to improve the outcomes of at-risk children. Bill Cosby should give him a call.



Yes, this was DEFINITELY an okay place to get that off.

Posted by Prometheus 6 on July 21, 2004 - 9:47am :: Race and Identity
 
 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Black leaders. Bill Cosby is not one. You may not like Farrakhan or Sharpton or Jackson, but they have devoted their working lives to trying to improve the status of the Black community. Bill Cosby has spent his working life trying to make people laugh, and mostly white people at that."

I completely disagree with this, and don't see how anyone could possibly accept such statements as valid. Farrakhan and Sharpton are leaders while Cosby isn't? Hell no!

You may not like what Cosby had to say, but the fact is that he's done far more to help black people than you, I or the likes of hustlers like Farrakhan and Sharpton ever will do. He's put his money where his mouth is, put in the effort to get a PhD in education, and then spent years applying that education to bettering the lot of black people, when he could have spent his free time wallowing selfishly in luxury like the majority of black people who've made it on TV and the big screen. None of what he did was compulsory, not a damn bit of it - he did it because he *wanted* to - and yet when he dares to point out the very real and troublesome tendencies that are apparent in sections of the black community in America, he's suddenly undeserving of respect, as if an opportunist like Sharpton who's always ready to blame the white man were some paragon of virtue.

I never voted for Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton to "lead" me, and none of them have ever held any political office. They all know how to hog the limelight, but I've yet to see anything whatsoever these three men have done to earn my respect - being skilled at self-promotion just isn't enough. If all it takes to become a black "leader" is to be willing to keep one's mouth shut about any shortcomings on one's own side, and to lay the blame for every last failing of one's people on The Man, then I say the black community is better off without such worthless leadership.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.10
Comment: My Public Key is at the following URL:
Comment: http://www.alapite.net/pgp/AbiolaLapite.txt

iD8DBQFA/olSOgWD1ZKzuwkRAnFRAKCG/+cvo+o56A0UxPHjbgxZseVXuwCdFpHP
cxxlwCX9G8UUPGs+T12zkq8=
=zO5I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Posted by  Abiola Lapite (not verified) on July 21, 2004 - 11:20am.

Are we saying "leader" is someone with a following (which is the position my anonymous friend takes)?

Jackson et al are not YOUR leaders or mine. Neither is Cosby, for that matter.

If we're saying "leader" is some who takes a forward position, all of them qualify based on the number of arrows in their backs.

Posted by  P6 (not verified) on July 21, 2004 - 11:38am.

(completely beside the point)

put in the effort to get a PhD in education

I thought that was honorary?

(on-topic comment)

In re: Sharpton, Nathan Newman's thoughtful post made me appreciate Sharpton rather more than I had.

Posted by  sennoma (not verified) on July 21, 2004 - 12:00pm.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Nathan Newman's thoughtful post made me appreciate Sharpton rather more than I had"

All Newman's words tell me is that a broken clock can be right twice a day. I don't appreciate Sharpton in the slightest; I think he's a clownish, self-promoting opportunist who only gets the media spotlight because he validates all the worst white stereotypes about blacks as buffoons.

I was living in New York when Amadou Diallo and Patrick Dorismond got shot, and yes, I saw firsthand that Sharpton was on the spot running marches on so forth, but the impression I got from it all was far less flattering than the one you seem to have - the fact is that Sharpton's involvement actually worked to the *disadvantage* of the Diallo family, as Guiliani could (and did) wave away all the outrage as just what you'd expect coming from a hustler like the "reverend" Al - and the white public largely bought Guiliani's version of the story. When I see white liberals making excuses for such a clown I can't escape the feeling of being condescended to - "We mustn't expect too much of these people."

Fools like Sharpton and racist paranoids like Farrakhan are part of the *problem*, not the solution, and its a disgrace that they get so much attention when there are so many black people making their mark in the world without feeding anybody's stereotypes - then again, sober, sensible black men with something meaningful to say don't make for gripping TV coverage ...

The bottom line from my angle is that Cosby was 100% correct. Yes, there are systematic problems black people have to deal with, and yes, racism is still alive and well in the world - like P6, being black and male I know what it's like to get the fearful looks, or to be tailed as if I were about to commit a robbery. Having said that, it's just too easy to blame "the system" for one's own failings, as if one had no self-control whatsoever. How does "racism" force anybody to beat his girlfriend, or get her pregnant and abandon her, or spend precious income on Timberlands instead of textbooks? How does "racism" *force* anybody to start selling crack? I've lived through a lot worse poverty than anything to be seen in America's ghettoes - think *Third World* levels here - and the very idea that I'd do any of these things is anathema to me, but dare anyone suggest like Cosby that such choices are, well, *choices*, and someone is quick to rush out to scream "Sellout!" or "Uncle Tom!"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.10
Comment: My Public Key is at the following URL:
Comment: http://www.alapite.net/pgp/AbiolaLapite.txt

iD8DBQFA/sEJOgWD1ZKzuwkRAlv3AJ44bzV9cPEJJBQ0rlAMKFc5a7BfGwCfRtBp
xwFZEafi/CV8KQLIkhQqjpQ=
=Jf6i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Posted by  Abiola Lapite (not verified) on July 21, 2004 - 3:17pm.

For a while now, I've heard the meme "Black kids think that doing well in school is acting White." It's stated as if fact, common knowledge, and a documented phenomenon.

While I've known many kids to be picked on for "acting White," like this commenter stated, they were generally the ones who had White friends and/or brushed off the other Black kids. Because the kid being picked on can't bring himself to say "They call me these names because I have nothing but White friends and they don't really know me" some one (probably an adult) is telling them they are being called names b/c the other kids are jealous and that they should keep making good grades and continue to try to be "better" than the other Black kids, all while their White friends are telling them that they are "different" from the rest. Does similar backlash occur when Whites begin hanging aroung Blacks, or Asians begin hanging around Hispanics and so forth?

If I had time and resources, I'd spend time researching this "anti-intellectual" movement that everyone insists is permeating the souls of Black children, to find out what it is, if it's unique, and more importantly if it really exists.

Posted by  Chrissy (not verified) on July 21, 2004 - 3:43pm.

I'll tell you my own experience Chrissy: "You think you're white" means "You disrespect all I care about."

This is no statement abouth whether one SHOULD care about the particular unidentified things.

Posted by  P6 (not verified) on July 21, 2004 - 5:58pm.

I agree its too easy to blame the system. But its too easy to "blame" anyone. "Blaming" is something you can do over the phone.

Jesse Jackson does more than "blames the system". Jesse Jackson inspired millions of Black people to vote and participate in the electoral system.

Al Sharpton does more than "blames the system". Al Sharpton organizes public protests against specific outrages that are intended to raise awareness of racial problems and thereby to hasten the solution of the problems. Sharpton has recently adopted Jackson's strategy of mobilizing voters through a national campaign.

Farrakhan does more than "blames the system". Farrakhan created the largest non-white-sponsored quasi political organization in the US. This organization has helped thousands of Black people overcome drug habits. This organization has convinced more thousands to dress more neatly and to regain a work ethic _despite_ the fact that the practical value of a work ethic seems to have been decreasing.

Geoffrey Canada does more than "blames the system". He has arranged for resources to be devoted to provide programs for thousands of at-risk children to keep them in structured activities and to help them gain life skills.

Bill Cosby does more than "blames the system". He gave $20 million to Spelman and he blames the children. He does not compare to the other four.

Bill Cosby also insinuates that other people are "just blaming the system." Who are these other people? Why is he afraid to name them?

Is blaming the children really more productive than blaming the system? Neither one is active. On the other hand, in a democracy, the system can be changed directly. In real life, the children could not care less what Bill Cosby has to say.

It seems to me that it is better to be active than to blame anyone. But if you must blame someone, the system is probably a better target than children you don't know.

Posted by  anon (not verified) on July 21, 2004 - 7:34pm.

(Email domain deliberately misspelled; "hotmail," not "hotmial")

I referred to Cosby as "a leader" for no reason other than that he was attempting to "lead" (or, in the neutral sense of the term, be an ideologue).

P6, please check out Boondocks. If you're familiar with the "Hey Daddy, I'm Jesus Christ!" sketch of Bill Cosby, it's really funny.

Posted by  James R MacLean (not verified) on July 23, 2004 - 1:15pm.