Do not let politics make other vital issues slip your mind

BRINGING HUMAN RIGHTS HOME:
STOPPING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ONLINE CHAT

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA and the MOVING IDEAS NETWORK
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 � all day starting at 10 AM

Ask a Question | Panelist Bios | Get Involved! | Learn More

Organizations around the world are gearing up for 16 Days of Activism Against Domestic Violence (November 25 � December 10), a worldwide campaign that provides an opportunity to take a stand against gender-based violence and to mobilize around women's human rights.

In preparation for 16 Days of Activism Against Domestic Violence, Moving Ideas and Amnesty International USA have teamed up to host an online chat on domestic violence. Ask experts in the field of domestic violence about dating violence, the effects of domestic violence on low-income women, services for survivors and domestic violence abroad. Also, learn what you can do to stop domestic violence.

Submit your question today: http://www.movingideas.org/chat/

ONLINE CHAT PANELISTS

Sheila Dauer, Director of Women's Rights, Amnesty International USA
Sheila Dauer, Director of AIUSA's Women's Human Rights Program, has been on the staff of AIUSA since 1979. Since 1988, as a charter member of an AIUSA Taskforce on Women's Human Rights, she has worked with both international and US AI staff, board and volunteer leaders to develop AI's policy, action and publications on women's human rights. In 1991, she prepared AI's first international report on women's human rights, Women in the Front Line. As Acting Campaign Director in 1995, Dr. Dauer directed AIUSA's campaign on women's human rights concurrent with the UN 4th World Conference on Women. She is currently the Director of AIUSA's Women's Human Rights Program.

Dr. Dauer, who holds a Ph.D. in Anthropology, received two research fellowships from the National Institute of Mental Health and a Ford Foundation Fellowship on Women's Studies. She is an emeritus member of the Human Rights Committee of the American Anthropological Association. (2000-2002)

Lise McKean, Deputy Director of Center for Impact Research
Ms. McKean received her Ph.D. in Social Anthropology from the University of Sydney , M.A. from the University of Hawaii , and B.A. from the University of Chicago.

Ms. McKean serves as the director of the Kraft Domestic Violence Grant Program, a demonstration project providing research and technical assistance to collaborations between domestic violence service providers and job training agencies in Chicago, Seattle, and Houston. She is also director of the Income Support Access Project, which investigates the reasons for low usage of income support programs and recommends improvements to outreach and application procedures so that more eligible low-income working families can obtain these benefits.

Diana Zuckerman, Ph.D., President of National Center for Policy Research for Women and Families
Dr. Zuckerman started her career as a psychologist on the faculty of Vassar College and then directed research on the impact of television on children as a faculty member at Yale University. After a post-doctoral fellowship in epidemiology at Yale Medical School, working on studies of depression, domestic violence, and the health of the elderly poor, she went to Harvard to direct the Seven College Study, a project designed to evaluate the life goals and self-concepts of undergraduates at seven liberal arts colleges.

Dr. Zuckerman left her distinguished academic career in 1983, to come to Washington, DC as a Congressional Science Fellow, sponsored by the American Psychological Association. She spent ten years working as a Congressional staffer in the House and Senate, and at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, working to improve federal programs and policies for women and families. She initiated highly influential Congressional investigations on such issues as conflicts of interest in scientific research; safety of medical implants; the health of Gulf War veterans; federal research priorities in women's health; and political interference with federal grants to assist the elderly, the disabled, and victims of child abuse and neglect.

GET INVOLVED!

Take action to help end domestic violence! November 25 marks the first day of the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence, a worldwide campaign that provides an opportunity to take a stand against gender-based violence and to mobilize around women's human rights. Organizers chose the dates, November 25, International Day Against Violence Against Women and December 10, International Human Rights Day, in order to symbolically link violence against women and human rights and to emphasize that such violence is a violation of human rights.

Learn how you can plug into the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence. Check out Amnesty International's 16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence page complete with factsheets and cool downloads for activists.

LEARN MORE

Amnesty International

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.prometheus6.org/trackback/7431
Posted by Prometheus 6 on November 13, 2004 - 12:45pm
 
 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Interesting. & btw it's nice what you've done with the site.

The sad part for me is that these symposiums & get togethers of various labelings often overlook a very (if not the most) effective means of preventing women from being injured through relationship based violence: violent self defense.

I agree that avoiding the situation & many other things commonly discussed are important, bu until they also include discussion of self defense (& armed self defense at that) then I can't really take them seriously. Sure, they'd like to stop domestic violence, but not if it means a woman using violence defensively.

AI is one of the most prolific international groups in favor of civilian disarmament. On account of that I admit I'm a little biased against them. Still, it'd be nice if instead of organizing chat sessions to discuss feelings & pray for peace they'd also discuss defensive training (especially defensive trainign w/ weapons). Now it's not a perfect solution in all cases or for every woman, but I'm thinking that if a few dozen guys get shot or hospitalized a year in a state (& siad state doesn't prosecute the woman involved) that's do a lot more towards reducing domestic violence than lighting candles.

Ah, looking through some of the links I see there is more than a little talk about the government being responsible for violence against women & its prevention. Now in certain societies I can agree, but for the most part I'd argue that it's not the governments responsibility unless said government created the situation explicitly. Not to mention the references to the UN's UDHR which painfully lacks any strong language on individual self defense & the forms for reporting things directly to the UN bothers me to no end.

I think it's a good idea (the discussion) in general, but I'm afraid they won't discuss what needs to be discussed. They'll spend most of their time speaking of government programs & counseling & such, when they should be promoting the idea that any person, including a woman, is responsible for his/her own safety & should learn how to provide for it

.& no. it's not as simple as picking up a gun. It takes developing a persons mind to recognize their situation & how to act upon it. But defensive violence should not be overlooked as I'm sure it will be on Tuesday.

Posted by  Publicola (not verified) on November 14, 2004 - 12:35pm.

Now it's not a perfect solution in all cases or for every woman, but
I'm thinking that if a few dozen guys get shot or hospitalized a year
in a state (& siad state doesn't prosecute the woman involved)
that's do a lot more towards reducing domestic violence than lighting
candles.

Someone will likely get annoyed, but I don't disagree.

Such a solution brings its own problems

  • that the abuser will be just as likely to know the location of the weapon as the victim
  • that the abuser will be more likely to use the weapon as the victim
  • we think of solutions in terms of the most available resources and I prefer resources that don't kill a muhfugger

...but my major problem with, say, gangbangers is the missed too damn often.

Posted by  Prometheus 6 on November 14, 2004 - 1:38pm.

P6,

"Such a solution brings its own problems

that the abuser will be just as likely to know the location of the weapon as the victim...that the abuser will be more likely to use the weapon as the victim...we think of solutions in terms of the most available resources and I prefer resources that don't kill a muhfugger"

possibly, but in most instances an abuser either has his own weapons or is physically imposing enough to do damage w/o them. Women benefit from weapon use moreso than men simply because of the size difference that is often (but by no means always) going to give the advantage to a man. A weapon can (but by no means always) equalize things for a woman.

As for an abuser being mroe likely to use a weapon (or at least have intent to cause serious harm) again I can't say this isn't sometimes the case. The key is to educate victims & potential victims of abuse about that whole Right of Defense thing. Teach them that they may have to use force to protect themselves &/or their loved ones. I spend a lot of time talking about the implements of self defense, but I cnnot stress enough that the mindset is the most importsant thing.

& I think everyone would prefer a resource that didn't result in serious injury or death. I prefer people who understand what "merge" means on the highway too. Unfortunately the preference in either case isn't always going to match reality. In the world in which we live there's a strong possibility that we'll have to choose between fighting back, hauling ass, or capitulating to any & all demands by an aggressor. & if or when you have that decision to make, it might come down to using deadly force to save your own skin. It's not something to look forward to, but it's not something to discount just because it's not the best possible solution. Sometimes violence is the only or best answer.

"...but my major problem with, say, gangbangers is the missed too damn often."

I grew up in a fairly rough part of town. When people who knew the area learned where I lived & started asking about how bad it was I'd usally tell them that it wasn't so bad as long as the thugs were pissed off at you. If they were pissed at the guy next to ya that's when you started worrying. :)

Posted by  Publicola (not verified) on November 16, 2004 - 12:11pm.

All cool.

Just recognize that what Amnesty International's approach is bringing to the table is much more likely to be used by someone suffering the psychological stress that comes with being battered. If my issue is benefitting those who need help getting away from those conditions, AI's approach will get my support. Once that's established I have no problem with people grafting their issues on to get them considered.

Posted by  Prometheus 6 on November 16, 2004 - 1:03pm.