And yet nothing really changed

Quote of note:

One parent who pulled her son from Oak Grove and sent him to Sequoia Middle School in Pleasant Hill called it "The Great White Flight."

Kristy Caldwell's two children, who attend the high-performing Bancroft Elementary in Walnut Creek, would attend Oak Grove, and that deeply concerns her.

"I'm not prejudiced, (but) the school became English-as-a-second-language, " she said. "You would be taking my kids from a great environment to a ghetto environment where they're struggling with other needs ... The test scores at Oak Grove are terrible."

Families flee school's sinking scores
'Underperforming' label exacerbates problem in Concord

- Carrie Sturrock, Chronicle Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 1, 2005

Oak Grove Middle School has low state test scores, and for many parents -- and teachers -- that's all they need to know.

It doesn't matter that the Concord school once was honored as a California Distinguished School and has classes for gifted and talented students, a state-of-the-art technology program and even a psychologist on campus to support the kids.

What matters is that widely publicized state test scores and the federal No Child Left Behind Act have labeled the school underperforming, giving parents a reason to leave. Enrollment has dropped from 915 last year to 750, and the parents of another 180 students have requested transfers by the fall. The act also has figured in the loss of 40 teachers in recent years, Principal Lorie O'Brien said.

"The court of public opinion has not served us well," she said. "When these labels first became part of our lives, a tremendous amount of (my) time went into being a counselor. It took a lot for people to come to terms with that."

The flight of well-prepared students from once-well-regarded schools such as Oak Grove is happening across the nation as a consequence of the federal No Child Left Behind legislation, educators say. The schools fail to meet state and federal accountability standards often because they're struggling to teach low-scoring students who are learning English after immigrating to the United States, said Jack Jennings, director of the Center on Education Policy in Washington, D.C., an advocacy organization for more effective public schools which has studied the effects of the federal law.

Jennings and other education experts say that as the schools' test scores spiral downward, it's not uncommon for the more educated families to pull their kids out, increasing the percentage of low-scoring students and making it even more difficult to raise the scores. As a result, the schools -- which range from suburban ones such as Oak Grove to urban campuses -- lose per-pupil funding and the benefits of parents with the time and resources to get involved.

Educators say that while No Child Left Behind has benefits, such as English learners getting more attention than ever before, schools get labels that are hard to shake.

"(At) schools that are so labeled, sometimes teachers feel they're being blamed unfairly, and sometimes teachers are looking for ways to leave," Jennings said. "Sometimes the better-educated parents take advantage of the school choice option."

Oak Grove has always had a mix of students from blue- and white-collar families who live in Concord and more affluent Walnut Creek. In 1996, the state named it a California Distinguished School for its exemplary teaching and high standards.

But in the seven years since the first of the state's new test scores -- which the federal law uses to gauge a school's performance -- the school has seen a marked shift in its demographics: The Hispanic population -- which is largely from the Monument Boulevard area in Concord -- has jumped from 27 to 52 percent, while the white population has dropped from 57 to 30 percent, according to the state Department of Education.

Posted by Prometheus 6 on February 1, 2005 - 9:08am :: Education
 
 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

P6 observes no changes, and if we only consider changes for the better of that school, he's right.

The author of the piece observes many changes, all for the worse of the school. But the best idea she can muster for improving the situation is to not test, so we wouldn't be able to prove there is a problem. Without hard evidence to the contrary, the school can internally define "doing fine", and then claim to be doing fine. We might see difficulties in years to come, but hey, that's a long time coming, and in any case it will be hard to pin on that particular school.

But there is real change reported in that story. Parents who care changed the school their kids were attending. That change might be bad for some adults, but it was sure good for the kids.

Posted by  dwshelf on February 1, 2005 - 7:02pm.

When I say nothing changed I mean the school, which is apparently a very good one, still had all the resources and programs that made it highly thought of and those students that were in a position to do well before were still in that position.

The Spanish speaking students that don't test as well in English changed nothing for well-positioned students...and for themselves they had the opportunity to learn in a highly enriched environment.

Now, white flight is sucking the wind from its sails. That has nothing to do with the schools' performance, but with the parent's perception of it as an "English as a second language" school.

Posted by  Prometheus 6 on February 1, 2005 - 7:39pm.

The Spanish speaking students that don't test as well in English changed nothing for well-positioned students

Students who don't speak passable English consume significant teacher resources simply by needing to be taught English along with the topic at hand. While the teacher is teaching English, no one is being taught the subject.

Now, white flight is sucking the wind from its sails.

I don't know this school personally, but knowing the area as highly racially diverse, I'd be willing to take a bet that this flight thing is not limited to whites. Would you choose such a school for your kid if you had an alternative?

Posted by  dwshelf on February 1, 2005 - 10:14pm.

A California Distinguished School with classes for gifted and talented students and a state-of-the-art technology program?

Yes.

Posted by  Prometheus 6 on February 2, 2005 - 12:43am.

It's not that diverse. Concord's no Walnut Creek, but then again, it's no Richmond. I rather like this take on it. (Full disclosure: I work at that paper, where Sturrock used to work, and live in Walnut Creek.) If I had to guess, I'd say black flight in the area is much more about affordable housing than fear of a Spanish-speaking school district)

Posted by  George (not verified) on February 2, 2005 - 12:45am.

Interesting statistics.

I think the point stands however, it's not just whites leaving that school. It's pretty much anyone who both cares and has a real opportunity to leave. That includes blacks, Asians, and 2nd+ generation Hispanics along with non-Hispanic whites.

P6, the question isn't whether you would have sent your kid to that school nine years ago. It's whether you would send your kid there today, again, assuming you had an alternative.

Posted by  dwshelf on February 2, 2005 - 1:44am.

I know the question. I gave you my answer...and you know by now I don't posture.

Posted by  Prometheus 6 on February 2, 2005 - 2:15am.

Post new comment

*
*

*

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.