There are those (whom, to save them embarrassment, I shall not link to at this time) who feel the Christian Right aren't significant enough to worry about. I think the Quote of Note settles all that.

But the argument that a religious institution spending public funds has the right to require employees to embrace its beliefs— and that it will be backed by the Justice Department in doing so — has changed the debate. It is an argument the Bush administration is making in Congress as well as in the courts.

Justice Unit Puts Its Focus on Faith
A little-known civil rights office has been busily defending religious groups.
By Richard B. Schmitt
Times Staff Writer
March 7, 2005

WASHINGTON   One of the main jobs at the Justice Department is enforcing the nation's civil rights laws. So when a nonprofit group was accused of employment discrimination last year in New York, the department moved swiftly to intervene —  but not on the side one might expect.

The Salvation Army was accused in a lawsuit of imposing a new religious litmus test on employees hired with millions of dollars in public funds.

When employees complained that they were being required to embrace Jesus Christ to keep their jobs, the Justice Department's civil rights division took the side of the Salvation Army.

Defending the right of an employer using public funds to discriminate is one of the more provocative steps taken by a little-known arm of the civil rights division and its special counsel for religious discrimination.

The Justice Department's religious-rights unit, established three years ago, has launched a quiet but ambitious effort aimed at rectifying what the Bush administration views as years of illegal discrimination against religious groups and their followers.

Many court decisions have affirmed the rights of individuals in the public sector not to have religious beliefs imposed on them   the Supreme Court ruling banning school-sponsored prayer in public schools among them. And courts have ruled that the rights of religious groups sometimes need protection too   upholding, for example, their right to have access to public buildings for meetings.

But the argument that a religious institution spending public funds has the right to require employees to embrace its beliefs —  and that it will be backed by the Justice Department in doing so —  has changed the debate. It is an argument the Bush administration is making in Congress as well as in the courts.