Pay attention Black folks...

by Prometheus 6
March 11, 2005 - 8:01am.
on Seen online

You don't change your goals. You explain them in terms of the current paradigm.

LATER: I am not suggesting you hide or sugar-coat a situation. The current paradign, no matter what it is, will always have ways to snark.

Bricks, mortar and our values
Civil engineers say our eroding infrastructure is becoming a morality and quality-of-life issue.
By John Balzar
Times Staff Writer
March 9, 2005

"Values" worked for George Bush. Might they do the same for our congested highways? For run-down schools? For our overflowing sewers?

In another sign of the evolving language that drives American politics, the women and men responsible for the structural foundation of society want to be part of the "values" debate.

A survey to be issued today by the American Society of Civil Engineers concludes that the United States is falling apart   and ideals that we hold dear are being eroded along the way. In report-card terms, roads, mass transit systems, power grids, water supplies, wastewater treatment facilities, schools, hazardous waste cleanup and parks earn the United States a miserable grade of D.

That's down just a notch since the organization's last report card in 2001, which gave the country a D-plus. What is different this time is the 137,000-member organization's attempt to engage voters in terms they seem to care the most about: family concerns, personal safety, economic security, quality of life and old-fashioned moral principals.

In short, values.

"It almost falls into the 'duh' category," said Larry Roth, a civil engineer and the society's deputy director. "If we don't reverse things we'll see a threat to our economy, to our environment, to our health and to our quality of life."

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Quaker in a Basement on March 11, 2005 - 4:59pm.

You explain them in terms of the current paradigm.

Good observation.

George W. Bush (or maybe Karl Rove, speaking through Bush) has played this strategy over and over: "The budget surplus means we need a tax cut!" then "The recession means we need a tax cut!" and then "The deficit means...." yeah, you know.

In spite of the clear truth of who benefits from the Bush tax cuts, what do you have now? Tax cuts, supported by lots and lots of people who don't really get much from them.

Yes, harness your goal to the current paradigm, and be ready to change along with the conventional wisdom.

Good post, P6.

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 11, 2005 - 6:27pm.

Could have been a better post. I should have said "You explain them using the term of the current paradigm" instead of "in terms of etc."

Submitted by Quaker in a Basement on March 11, 2005 - 6:40pm.

OK, but while you're still revising the wording (we all do that, don't we?) I'm seeing a startling insight: an article about civil engineers informs us about social movements and patterns of change.

That's why I like to come here.