Money for health care diverted to anti-terrorism? I'm not surprised. Are you surprised?

by Prometheus 6
May 16, 2005 - 10:32am.
on Health | War

F.B.I. Said to Misuse Funds for Health Fraud Cases
By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON, May 15 - Money earmarked by Congress for investigating health care fraud appears to have been shifted improperly to other purposes, like fighting terrorism, Congressional auditors say in a new report.

The report, to be issued this week by the Government Accountability Office, says health care cases got short shrift from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which was supposed to use the money exclusively to investigate fraud against Medicare, Medicaid and other health programs. The money came from an account in the Medicare trust fund.

The bureau was unable to show that it had used the money for the intended purpose, the report said, noting that F.B.I. agents "previously devoted to health care fraud investigations were shifted to counterterrorism activities" in the last three years.

Moreover, it said, the bureau "was unable to track overall costs related to health care fraud investigations." As a result, it said, the bureau and taxpayers had "minimal assurance" that all the money - $114 million a year - was properly spent.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Quaker in a Basement on May 16, 2005 - 4:03pm.

Why isn't anyone worried about this huge fraud? Here's why:

"The Bush administration says that last year, 9.3 percent of the claims were paid in error, resulting in overpayments of $19.9 billion to doctors, hospitals and other health care providers."

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on May 16, 2005 - 4:40pm.

Now, fact is, if you KNOW the percentage that was paid in error you oughtto be able to track it down and demand its return.

IF, of course, you investigate.

Submitted by Quaker in a Basement on May 16, 2005 - 9:41pm.

If we had nearly $20 billion a year in fraudulent payments going to poor folks, it'd be a national scandal.

It's true what they say: education pays!

Submitted by dwshelf on May 17, 2005 - 6:42am.

You're correct, qb.

Scams by welfare queens attract less money and more attention than scams by medical providers.

I'm not sure why we should tolerate either one, but surely the attention should follow the money, not the class of the crook. 

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on May 17, 2005 - 2:40pm.

We should NOT tolerate either one.

Any speculation on why we tolerate the one we do? 

Submitted by Quaker in a Basement on May 17, 2005 - 3:52pm.

"Any speculation...?

Well let me just whip it out: politicians don't worry about doctors and health care orgs collecting bogus payments. The people who get the money give their favorite politicians a taste of the loot. That is, the people who collect fraudulent medicare payments make political contributions. Big ones.

Submitted by dwshelf on May 17, 2005 - 4:11pm.

Any speculation on why we tolerate the one we do?

Because it's harder to track down.

Some of the fraud is in the margin: as part of a large medical procedure, the patient potentially  needed some small procedure, the stuff was brought out, but not used and returned to stock. The the provider charged as if it had been used.

Some of the fraud is unnecessary procedures. 

And some of it is bald theft, submitting charges for procedures which never occurred, and on behalf of patients who were never seen, and by doctors who aren't.

Tracking this stuff down takes smart people.  The FBI has smart people, but as we see, they basically find medical fraud boring.  If you worked for the FBI, would you like to be assigned to the medical fraud section?

Submitted by Quaker in a Basement on May 17, 2005 - 6:13pm.

Nonsense, dw.

You're telling us that people holler about "welfare cheats" because they're so easy to detect? And they don't holler about "medicare cheats" because they're so hard to spot?

The question wasn't "Why don't we catch 'em?" It was "Why do we tolerate them?" It's pretty clear there's a big difference in tolerance for one type of cheat over the other.

(Edit: I don't have any tags in this post. Dunno why it's in itals. LATER: Fixed now. Thanks.)

Submitted by dwshelf on May 18, 2005 - 4:28am.

At one level, welfare cheats are in fact quite tolerated.  You got a welfare mother doing some cash babysitting, maybe selling some stuff on eBay for other people, no one's going to be upset.  She's just being entreprenurial, eh?  Lots of people who get off welfare use this path.

Post new comment

*
*
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*

  • Removes empty tags than can be left behind by tinymce
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.