Just as predicted

In commenting on Universities Record Drop In Black Admissions, Molotov says:

We predict that the black graduation rate will significantly increase, because of the better match between schools and students' abilities. Affirmative action costs blacks in future income, because unqualified folks at certain elite schools drop out when they would have done well at other academic institutions.

This is absurd.

Harvard or UVa teaches nothing other colleges don't. The skills needed are the same. And frankly, competition is less valuable than education as a marker of success…those that pass the course work are qualified, and any number of people who were rejected outright would have passed the course work.

The comment is apparently based on a preliminary draft of an article Richard Sanders, a law professor at UCLA. The Chronicle of Higher Education has a good overview of the arguments Sandler presents.

His study, "A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools," found that:

  • After the first year of law school, 51 percent of black students have grade-point averages that place them in the bottom tenth of their classes, compared with 5 percent of white students. "Evidence suggests that when you're doing that badly, you're learning less than if you were in the middle of a class" at a less-prestigious law school, Mr. Sander says.

    [P6: And yet this

    Two of the authors -- David L. Chambers, an emeritus professor of law, and Richard O. Lempert, a law professor, both at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor -- are no strangers to the affirmative-action debate. In 2000 they published a study that found that minority students who graduated from Michigan's law school between 1970 and 1996 were just as successful in their careers as their white peers, even though they started with significantly lower law-school grades and standardized-test scores.
    shows evidence suggests those particular indicators just aren't a good gauge.]
  • Among students who entered law school in 1991, about 80 percent of white students graduated and passed the bar on their first attempt, compared with just 45 percent of black students. In a race-blind admissions system, the number of black graduates passing the bar the first time would jump to 74 percent, he says, based on his statistical analysis of how higher grades in less competitive schools would result in higher bar scores. Black students are nearly six times as likely as whites not to pass state bar exams after multiple attempts.
  • Ending affirmative action would increase the number of new black lawyers by 8.8 percent because students would attend law schools where they would struggle less and learn more, earn higher grades, and have better success on the job market.

All specious as hell from the student's perspective.

Kathy Hart, a 2003 Harvard Law School graduate who is now working for a law firm in Boston, says racial preferences are not the issue.

"The problem is not so much the entry; it's what happens while you're there," says Ms. Hart, who is black. As a minority law student, "you're more likely to feel isolated and marginalized, and feel like 'nobody gets my experience.'"

That, in turn, can undermine a student's confidence, she says.

And since when does struggling less mean learning more?

His last point i found especially interesting

  • With the exception of the most-elite law schools, good grades matter more to employers than the law school's prestige.

…because we are, after all, talking about the very most-elite law schools he admits are the exception.

A technical response to Sanders' article is available …I figure since Sanders leaked his article before publication, leaking the reply is cool. But I personally want to note a couple of things.

First of all, it's obvious what the elite schools provide that makes attending one a valuable experience: connections.

And since we know from Prof. Chambers and Lempert's work the success of one's education is not totally reflected by the grade markers in use (and we know this as regard women as well), since we know stereotype threat is a real problem because it transcends both race and gender, I would think we need more research along the lines of

Factors Affecting the Completion of Undergraduate Degrees in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics for Underrepresented Minority Students
, done for California State University, or Work in Progress - Cognitive, Affective and Social
Factors Contributing to the Success in Undergraduate Computer Science and Engineering Education
, proposed at the 34th annual Frontiers in Education conference. Research that finds those additional factors for success so they can be used across the board.

Posted by Prometheus 6 on November 23, 2004 - 2:44am :: Race and Identity
 
 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Saw this at americanthinker.com:

Black student SAT scores, a national disgrace

For years, people like Thomas Sowell have argued that affirmative action regularly places Black students into schools for which they are not educationally qualified, that in so doing it dooms them to less challenging courses and failure. In debates about affirmative action , the performance of Black students on SAT tests is rarely mentioned. It should be. It is not only supportive of his arguments but the most damning evidence of the inadequacy of the urban school systems from which most of these students come.
 
According to the College Board, 1,877 African American students nationwide scored higher than 1300 out of a possible 1600 on the SAT last year, compared with nearly 150,000 students overall who achieved that score 

A SAT score of 1300 is a good baseline for competitive college-level  academic work .Only 1.2% of the students who achieved that level this year were Black. That's not enough to meet  the demand of the Ivies let alone all the other first level colleges vying for these students.
 
Until we face this fact head on and institute educational change at the elementary and high school levels, we are engaged in a  harmful charade.
 
Clarice R. Feldman  11 23 04

So now we are faced with numerous "studies" demonstrating by statistical "evidence" that affirmative action is holding us back.  Where do they come up with this self-serving garbage?  Is it supposed to give cover to those who would just as soon scrap affirmative action than defend it?  Is it intended to create a more friendly atmosphere for discussions among moderates, conservatives and the Christian Right when considering the "colored problem"?  Too many of us (including Clarence Thomas) already know the truth:  that but for affirmative action, we would have had few higher education or employment choices, and fewer opportunities to make significant contributions to academia, the professions, and American life in general.   

Posted by  Anonymous (not verified) on November 23, 2004 - 3:55pm.

Using the reasoning implicit in the Sanders study, if we could show that Black folks were more successful in building businesses when they did not compete with white businesses, then we could argue in favor of the re-establishment of segregation as beneficial to African Americans!  If Black students forced to compete with better prepared whites works such an injustice on us, and wastes spots in good schools that smarter white kids could have, then let's not just end affirmative action, let's require Black students to matriculate only at historically Black schools.  Needless to say, I think this kind of "study" is very dangerous, and is a case of using statistics the way a drunk uses a lampost--for support rather than illumination.

Just for laughs, let's fund a study of all white schools, which inevitably have some students at the bottom of the class, some that do not pass the bar exam, etc.  Let's isolate variables about such under-achievers:  Maybe they all come from families led by NASCAR dads; maybe they tend to come from public rather than private schools; maybe they're all legacy admissions.  Should that provide a basis for advocating that such students should not be admitted to universities for their other talents and accomplishments that might otherwise make them worthy of admission?  Someone is ALWAYS going to be on the bottom, and the reasons for their being there may not always be explained by RACE.

Posted by  Anonymous (not verified) on November 23, 2004 - 4:15pm.