The University of California might actually be serious about fair admissions policy

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on February 13, 2006 - 9:19am.
on

First they decide schools don't get to call religion science and get credit for it. Now they're addressing grade point inflation via AP courses.

In 1999, the UC faculty admissions committee recommended reducing the credit that students receive for taking AP classes, citing studies that found AP courses were a mediocre predictor of UC success. It also was growing increasingly obvious that reliance on AP courses discriminated against low-income and rural students, who attended schools that offered few, if any, AP courses. Despite these solid arguments, the regents tabled the matter.

Since then, an effort to bring more AP courses to low-income and rural schools has made some inroads, although it fell back during bad budget times. And last year, a UC task force found many of the same problems with the AP policy, and pointed out that other elite universities seldom award extra AP credit to applicants.

Now the UC faculty admissions committee is preparing to recommend that the system drop the AP credit entirely. Instead, the idea is to look more comprehensively at whether students took some of the more rigorous courses available at their schools. This time, the regents should listen.

February 13, 2006

ADVANCED PLACEMENT COURSES have long held a kind of magical allure for high school students of a certain clique. What other classes offer the chance to earn college credits? But now, 50 years after the first AP test was offered, AP courses are raising concerns familiar to the College Board, which also administers the exam's older cousin, the SAT. And after an almost inexcusable delay, the University of California is asking a lot of the right questions.

Since the first AP exam in 1956, the industry has become a force unto itself. More than 15,000 U.S. schools offer at least one of the 35 AP courses, according to the College Board, which last week issued a 94-page "Advanced Placement Report to the Nation" detailing how many more students are taking and passing the courses. President Bush has even made AP courses a part of his education policy.

AP courses, however, are now less about students seeking out deeper knowledge than about kids racking up points to impress college admissions committees. Academics are increasingly concerned that, although the courses are more rigorous than average classes, their quality has grown uneven. Too many such classes emphasize memorization over research, analysis and writing. About a dozen elite high schools have stopped offering them, and some top universities have made it harder to get college credit for them.

Now the University of California, which for nearly a quarter of a century has given an extra grade point to applicants who take AP and certain honors courses, is reconsidering its AP policy.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Rachel S (not verified) on February 13, 2006 - 5:09pm.
I think getting rid of the extra credits given to these courses is necessary for an admissions policy that doesn't discrimination based on urbanicty, class, or race.  I remember attending an academic camp, where I was one of a few kids from a low income school, and these kids were all talking about having 4.1 GPAs.  I remember asking how is that possible--the answer AP courses.  I had never heard of such a thing.  I think both AP courses and standardized tests give a tremendous advantage to kids in wealthy suburbs; moreover, if they are poor predictors of performance, then why both.  We have given them a chance; they don't seem to help much.  It's time to move on to something more egalitarian.