User loginLive Discussions
Most popular threads
Weekly Archives
Blog linksA Skeptical Blog |
Tip jarFor entertainment onlyThe Public LibraryReality checksNews sourcesLink CollectionsDropping KnowledgeLibrary of Congress African American Odyssey Who's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 4 guests online.
... |
Rats and sinking shipsSubmitted by Prometheus 6 on July 27, 2004 - 5:25am.
on Politics Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo linked to the unbelievable spectacle of Peggy Noonan expressing doubt about l'il Georgie's electability:
At first I thought one could say Bush has done what history sent him to do only after Dick Cheney is history. But then I gave it a bit of thought. Disregard for the moment that NObody "handled" 9/11. Well, you have to overlook that job growth hasn't kept up with population growth too, okay? And I guess it's only so important to recognize simply going into Afghanistan wasn't the mandate, taking out Al Qaida was. That Bush stopped short of that to invade Iraq is, I guess, balanced by…well, I don't know what it's balanced by but my ignorance isn't the point. The point is, she may have a point. George W. Bush and the Neocon contingent have shown exactly what happens when you let rhetoric rather than reason determine you policy. They've proven you can't trust people who expect you to disregard their actions in favor of the particular words they use in this particular conversation. They've given us a taste of the only political philosophy more dangerous in this day and age than isolationism: that philosophy is solipsism. These are things we need to understand on a damn near genetic level if we're going to survive. A while back, when I was writing in the mythic mode rather than the sociopolitical one, I wrote this thing:
In that context I can accept that history intended us to see the immense dangers of defining ourselves purely by our physical powers and economic interests. Especially when we don't actually seem to know the limits of that power. And George W. Bush has shown us those dangers, and in the person of his administration, has given people to whom HUMANS are the priority the opportunity to reject them. Yes, perhaps we can say George has done what history told him to do. When Cheney is history, we can definitely say it. Would rather be bored to death also... Understanding is a spiritual value. It takes into account how other feel. Bush cannot grasp this empathy and the Republican dialogue ignores such views as well. Unpatriotic, ungodly, not in the majority, unlike most people- wedge phrases that promote no understanding. Mr.Obama and former President Carter touched upon spiritual core values in their speeches. Each speech will stand as turning points. Both as statements of what America's values are. Carter's speech was what best summed up the Hope we embodied going into a new millenium poised to lead the world to better understanding.Resume that and right this wrong course! Obama's speech looks forward to a future of diverse unity with a rich background of those experiences. "Excitement" has a formal name and Barack Obama is its signature. |
|
I hope more than anything that Kerry's administration will be the most boring in history if "excitement" is what's been going on the last four years. And I devoutly hope that Dick Cheney, George Bush and all their cronies will be history after November.