Black Intrapolitics: The best response to John McWhorter's Washington Post editorial on the Watts riot

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on August 14, 2005 - 1:37pm.
Page 1 of 12

...would be a little taste of reality.

From The Black Experience in America by Norman Coombs, Chapter 12: Pages two and four are especially relevant.

LATER: Please read this as well 


The smoldering tensions and frustrations which lay just below the surface in the Afro-American community exploded into a racial holocaust on August 11, 1965, in Watts--a black ghetto just outside of Los Angeles. When the smoke finally subsided several days later, more than thirty people were dead, hundreds had been injured, and almost four thousand had been arrested. Property damage ran into the millions.

The nation was shocked. The mass communications media tended to exaggerate the amount of damage done and also conjured up visions, in the mind of white America, of organized black gangs deliberately and systematically attacking white people. Many felt that it had been the worst racial outbreak in American history. In fact, it was not. The 1943 riot in Detroit and the 1919 riot in Chicago had both been more violent. The 1917 race riots in East St. Louis, Illinois, had outdone the Watts outburst in terms of the amount of personal injury. The violence in most previous riots had been inflicted by whites against blacks, and perhaps this was why white America did not remember them very clearly. The violence in Watts, though not directed against white persons as many believed, was still accomplished by blacks and aimed against white-owned property. White Americans were confused because they felt they had given "them" so much. Whites could not understand why blacks were not thankful instead of being angry.

 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Single page

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Cobb on August 16, 2005 - 10:28am.

That's a lot of ink for 200 dead, but alas those were more dainty times than today... no wait was there a war going on then too?

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on August 16, 2005 - 10:56am.

All that ink covered several riots...didn't you read the piece before snarking?

It's history as presented by a historian rather than a polemicist.