Week of March 19, 2006 to March 25, 2006

I hate stumbling into stuff like this

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 25, 2006 - 8:04pm.

The OpenSource Metaverse Project is actually the sort of thing I wanted to do when I started programming. Only in my case it would have been a text based MUD...

I'm neither a C++ nor Python programmer and can't even begin to think about the outside possibility of messing with this. I'm not even a gamer. But I can think of a lot of "Snow Crash-ish " possibilities and geeks are crazy enough to do it. I mean people are already buying virtual property.

Seriously, I look at this project and get the same sort of feeling I got when I saw the first ad for a Timex-Sinclair computer. I knew it was useless, but...

The OpenSource Metaverse Project

The Metaverse project provides an OpenSource Metaverse engine along the lines of the commercial metaverse engines Second Life, There and ActiveWorlds.

John Tierney takes the argument to its logical extreme

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 25, 2006 - 2:56pm.
on |

Keying in on an op-ed that makes the remarkable complaint that increasing the number of women applying for college increases the competition between women for those seats, Mr. Tierney makes his case for Affirmative Action for White Boys.

I am amused.

The admissions director at Kenyon College, Jennifer Delahunty Britz, published an Op-Ed article this week revealing an awkward truth about her job: affirmative action for boys. As the share of the boys in the applicant pool keeps shrinking — it will soon be down to 40 percent nationally — colleges are admitting less-qualified boys in order to keep the gender ratio balanced on campus.

Let's take a look at what Ms. Britz said.

Truth is, it doesn't happen enough

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 25, 2006 - 9:35am.
on |

I like being wrong sometimes

I expected to be annoyed when I read the title of Joy Jones' editorial: Marriage Is for White People. I kept waiting for the twist that "proves" Black people are harlots by nature.

Most single black women over the age of 30 whom I know would not mind getting married, but acknowledge that the kind of man and the quality of marriage they would like to have may not be likely, and they are not desperate enough to simply accept any situation just to have a man. A number of my married friends complain that taking care of their husbands feels like having an additional child to raise. Then there's the fact that marriage apparently can be hazardous to the health of black women. A recent study by the Institute for American Values, a nonpartisan think tank in New York City, indicates that married African American women are less healthy than their single sisters.

Jeez, I hope this is fictional

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 25, 2006 - 8:46am.
on

Uncle Sam's Desperation -- and a Recruit's
By Brian Ford
Saturday, March 25, 2006; A19

"Can you give a psychological clearance for someone who wants to go into the military?" asked the caller, in a crisp, authoritative voice.

Having heard so much about the military's recent recruiting difficulties, I was intrigued. "Sure, assuming the person's okay."

"Now, I'm only authorized to pay for one session, but we don't want you to do psychoanalysis. You just need to say that this kid is okay to rejoin the Army."

"Rejoin?"

"He signed up three years ago, but then he got homesick and depressed, didn't feel comfortable handling weapons or with all the violence. He was generally discharged."

Six degrees of separation

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 25, 2006 - 8:21am.
on

I think I've figured out a way to explain to your average Republican why warrantless wiretapping is a threat.

Suppose we really, truly decided to crack down on violent racists. We have a real good idea of who and where they are.

Now, I would like you to seriously consider: if the FBI decided these guys will be enough trouble that they need to be controlled (and if a guest worker program is implemented, that's a serious possibility), they could easily get a warrant to oversee the communications of these groups. After all, they openly espouse the violent transformation of the current government. If the government chose to get them, they could.

This looks like a case for the Department of Homeland Security

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 25, 2006 - 8:16am.
on

They should get the known nest of terrorists that executed this attack. The full power of the NSA...

Oh. These guys aren't foreigners. My bad.

(And don't get it twisted...it's about no efforts to get bastards like these guys out of circulation...the NSA isn't needed but SOMETHING is.)

Hate Crime by a Neo-Nazi Is Suspected in Stabbings
By THE NEW YORK TIMES

NEW PORT RICHEY, Fla., March 24 — In what the authorities described as a possible Nazi hate crime, a man wearing a gas mask broke into a woman's mobile home in this Tampa suburb early Thursday morning, slashed her face and arms, and fatally wounded a friend of her son by stabbing him in the neck.

Y'all never really liked having a body, did you?

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 25, 2006 - 8:12am.
on

You know everyone got in those Matrix pods voluntarily, right?

When Virtual Worlds Collide
Grand Theft Auto crashes through EverQuest into The Sims! The walls dividing the game universe are coming down.
By Steven Johnson

Sometimes futurists get the future right. Millions of us now commute to mass­ively multiplayer online games in worlds much like the metaverse predicted by William Gibson, Neal Stephenson, and the Wachowski brothers. We live vicariously through our digital avatars in lushly rendered virtual environments, building and bartering, chatting and flirting, even falling in love. The population of the computer-generated universe is increasing at a rate that rivals email's growth 15 years ago. A decade hence, you'll drop a reference to your virtual doppelgängers just as casually as you give out your email address today.

In the United States of America, Christians commit the vast majority of crimes

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 25, 2006 - 7:22am.
on

You know I could make such an assertion stick, rhetorically speaking.

Just a thought...

Police Charge Pastor's Wife in His Slaying in Tennessee
By THEO EMERY

SELMER, Tenn., March 24 — The wife of a slain Tennessee minister was charged with first-degree murder on Friday after confessing to shooting him, the police said.

The defendant, Mary Winkler, 32, was arrested in Orange Beach, Ala., where the police discovered the family minivan on Thursday night pulled over on a roadside hundreds of miles from Selmer, where the family lived. She was found with the couple's three young daughters, who were unharmed.

The killing has roiled the town of Selmer, a southwestern Tennessee community about 80 miles east of Memphis where Matthew Winkler, 31, was known as an energetic and vibrant preacher at the Fourth Street Church of Christ, as well as a loving father and husband.

I suppose I should do this before I forget

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 24, 2006 - 3:01pm.
on
Before I address Professor Livingston's complaints about diversity hiring, a brief summary of the complaint. Market forces have created a demand for lawyers that understand cultures beyond that of mainstream America. Colleges and universities, in seeking to fill that demand, run afoul of the expectations of those who entered (or prepared to enter) academia under different market conditions.

Now. On to the complaints. If you read the original post I think you'll agree my excerpts lose no context.

The first problem relates to the organization of the hiring (admissions) process. Since race and gender are more or less objective, and quality is not, the former tend to move quickly from being a partial factor in hiring decisions to being the only factor that really counts...One can well ask whether this procedure produces the best candidates: but the point is that no one will believe they are the best candidates, even if they are, so that the process tends to degenerate into a "perpetual first wave" rather than any genuine progress to a more balanced faculty. (In almost twenty years of such policy there has been virtually no change in the female component of our faculty, and the percentage of minorities is actually lower than it was a decade ago.)

It's okay, law is a demanding field

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 24, 2006 - 1:23pm.
on

There's some buzz about a harsh critique of "diversity hiring of faculty" by Michael J. Livingston, a Professor of Law at the Rutgers-Camden School of Law.

I don't think it's a harsh critique so much as a bunch of harsh complaints, and frankly they stem from a misunderstanding of what's going on in his field. Prof. David B. Wilkins of Harvard Law School gave a nice rundown in his Harvard Law Review article,  From 'Separate is Inherently Unequal' to 'Diversity is Good for Business': The Rise of Market-Based Diversity Arguments and the Fate of the Black Corporate Bar. Here's the requisite part of Prof. Wilkins' paper...I'll be back to comment on Prof. Livingston's post in a little bit.

Why even bother passing laws?

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 24, 2006 - 12:06pm.
on

Quote of note:

Bush wrote: ''The executive branch shall construe the provisions . . . that call for furnishing information to entities outside the executive branch . . . in a manner consistent with the president's constitutional authority to supervise the unitary executive branch and to withhold information . . . "

Bush shuns Patriot Act requirement
In addendum to law, he says oversight rules are not binding
By Charlie Savage, Globe Staff  |  March 24, 2006

WASHINGTON -- When President Bush signed the reauthorization of the USA Patriot Act this month, he included an addendum saying that he did not feel obliged to obey requirements that he inform Congress about how the FBI was using the act's expanded police powers.

Kind of a weak start for your outreach program

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 24, 2006 - 12:00pm.
on |

Black Republican candidates for the United States Senate
By Paul M. Weyrich
web posted March 20, 2006

Republican National Chairman Kenneth B. Mehlman has gone out of his way to tell the Black community that it should not be taken for granted by Democrats but should give Republicans a second look. He cites various Republican initiatives, such as school choice, the No Child Left Behind measure and President George W. Bush's ownership society, as reasons for Black reconsideration.

I am convinced that Mehlman is sincere in not only wanting to see Blacks vote for Republicans but to see Black Republican candidates elected as well.

The creepiest thing I've never seen and never will

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 24, 2006 - 11:26am.
on

There's pictures of the damn thing on the other side of the link.

The monument also acknowledges the pop-diva’s pin-up past by showing Spears seductively posed on all fours atop a bearskin rug with back arched, pelvis thrust upward, as she clutches the bear’s ears with ‘water-retentive’ hands.

Monument to Pro-Life: The Birth of Sean Preston
Show Dates - April 7 through April 23
Opening night reception with the artist: Friday, April 7th 6-9pm
Capla Kesting Fine Art is located at:
121 Roebling St, 7-8 - Brooklyn, NY 11211
phone: 917-650-3760
Bedford Ave L Train at the corner of North 5th and Roebling.

DEDICATION HONORS NUDE BRITNEY SPEARS GIVING BIRTH
Pop-Star’s Pregnancy Idealized In Brooklyn ‘Monument to Pro-Life’

BROOKLYN (March 22, 2006) --- A nude Britney Spears on a bearskin rug while giving birth to her firstborn marks a ‘first’ for Pro-Life. Pop-star Britney Spears is the “ideal” model for Pro-Life and the subject of a dedication at Capla Kesting Fine Art in Brooklyn’s Williamsburg gallery district, in what is proclaimed the first Pro-Life monument to birth, in April.

Lot of interesting stuff in a little tiny space

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 24, 2006 - 10:44am.
on

There's an interesting interview with Lani Guinier at Alternet about her upcoming book "Meritocracy Inc.: How Wealth Became Merit, Class Became Race, and College Education Became a Gift from the Poor to the Rich," which will be published in 2007.

Rebecca Parrish: What is meritocracy? What is the difference between the conventional understanding and the way you are using the term in "Meritocracy Inc."?

Lani Guinier: The conventional understanding of meritocracy is that it is a system for awarding or allocating scarce resources to those who most deserve them. The idea behind meritocracy is that people should achieve status or realize the promise of upward mobility based on their individual talent or individual effort. It is conceived as a repudiation of systems like aristocracy where individuals inherit their social status.

I am arguing that many of the criteria we associate with individual talent and effort do not measure the individual in isolation but rather parallel the phenomena associated with aristocracy; what we're calling individual talent is actually a function of that individual's social position or opportunities gained by virtue of family and ancestry. So, although the system we call "meritocracy" is presumed to be more democratic and egalitarian than aristocracy, it is in fact reproducing that which it was intended to dislodge.

Here's another quote that caught my eye.

LG: Harvard University did a study based on 30 Harvard graduates over a 30-year period. They wanted to know which students were most likely to exemplify the things that Harvard values most: doing well financially, having a satisfying career and contributing to society (especially in the form of donating to Harvard). The two variables that most predicted which students would achieve these criteria were low SAT scores and a blue-collar background.

That study was followed by one at the University of Michigan Law School that found that those most likely to do well financially, maintain a satisfying career and contribute to society were black and Latino students who were admitted pursuant to affirmative action. Conversely, those with the highest LSAT scores were the least likely to mentor younger attorneys, do pro-bono work, sit on community boards, etc. So, the use of these so called "measures of merit" like standardized tests is backfiring on our institutions of higher learning and blocking the road to a more democratic society.

I like to post good stuff once in a while

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 24, 2006 - 10:03am.
on

Quote of note:

The three new papers, by researchers at the University of Chicago, Washington University in St. Louis, and Harvard's Joslin Clinic are published today in Science. In every case, the investigators followed Dr. Faustman's procedures, injecting diabetic mice with Freund's Complete Adjuvant, a mixture of water, oil and parts of dead bacteria. It overstimulates the immune system cells that are attacking the pancreas, making those white blood cells self-destruct, effectively stopping the attack and allowing the pancreas to cure itself.

A Controversial Therapy for Diabetes Is Verified
By GINA KOLATA

It's obvious who will work the farms

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 24, 2006 - 8:44am.
on

Quote:

The guest worker plan has some advantages for growers: legal workers are more dependable than illegal ones, they say. And it relieves them of any lingering fears that their harvest might be in jeopardy if immigration authorities conduct raids that disrupt the supply of illegal workers.

Yet growers have so many other complaints about the program that many are simply dropping out. To be entitled to use guest workers, they must certify to the Labor Department that they cannot find American workers for the job, a process that they say is overly onerous.

And once non-H-2A immigrant workers are brought out of the shadows, farmers who employ legal guest workers often find themselves being sued over working conditions by immigrants' rights groups and other foes of the program.

Bruce Goldstein, executive director of the Farm Workers Justice Fund in Washington, which has brought lawsuits against farmers, says there are good reasons for such lawsuits.

"Farmers under the H-2A program are being sued when they violate the law," Mr. Goldstein said. "They frequently violate the law. And employers have tremendous bargaining power over workers who are too fearful to challenge unfair or illegal conduct."

Who Will Work the Farms?
By EDUARDO PORTER

Sick fuck alert

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 24, 2006 - 8:37am.
on
March 23, 2006

KILLEEN, Texas --A Fort Hood soldier and his wife have been accused of injury to a child for allegedly forcing their 3-year-old daughter to beat up an older boy as they videotaped it, Killeen police said.

Dennis Michael Bittinger, 22, was arrested Wednesday and his wife, Rhonda Nicole Bittinger, 23, was taken into custody Thursday, police said.

The fight allegedly occurred Saturday while the couple babysat for the 5-year-old son of a friend, police said. When the boy's mother arrived to pick him up, she turned on the couple's video camera, which had previously been used to tape the children playing.

Finally, a gun law I like

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 23, 2006 - 10:26pm.
on

I'm just acknowleging guns are a integral part of middle American culture. The weapons training is the critical part, though I like the background check too.

The law allows Kansas residents over 21 years old to carry hidden guns into a variety of public places, although concealed weapons would be banned in schools, bars, courtrooms, churches and some other locations. To receive a permit, gun owners would have to pass a background check and receive weapons training.

See? That didn't hurt much, did it? Now we need to get the supply side rationalized.

Kansas lawmakers override veto on concealed guns
Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:40 PM ET

OVERLAND PARK, Kansas (Reuters) - Kansas lawmakers on Thursday overrode a veto by Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, making Kansas the 47th U.S. state to allow people to carry concealed handguns in public.

The Black Commentator is mad as hell

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 23, 2006 - 5:58pm.
on |

Again..

We have arrived at, and long passed, the juncture in Black politics when we can afford a false unanimity. Although there does exist an overwhelming consensus of progressive opinion among African Americans at-large, there is a deep and widening chasm between the people and those who purport to represent the masses - such as has not been seen since the mid-Sixties, when distinct strains of divergent Black political opinion gave motion to various oppositional movements. These movements were not opposed to each other, but were joined in opposition to racial oppression.

Gentlemen: allow me to suggest a solution.

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 23, 2006 - 4:30pm.
on

Wear a fucking condom.


A 25-year-old computer programmer in Michigan, Dubay wants to know why it is only women who have "reproductive rights." He is upset about having to pay child support for a baby he never wanted. Not only did his former girlfriend know he didn't want children, says Dubay, she had told him she was infertile. When she got pregnant nonetheless, he asked her to get an abortion or place the baby for adoption. She decided instead to keep her child and secured a court order requiring him to pay $500 a month in support.

Not fair, Dubay complains. His ex-girlfriend chose to become a mother. It was her choice not to have an abortion, her choice to carry the baby to term, her choice not to have the child adopted. She even had the option, under the "baby safe haven" laws most states have enacted, to simply leave her newborn at a hospital or police station. Roe v. Wade gives her and all women the right - the constitutional right! - to avoid parenthood and its responsibilities. Dubay argues that he should have the same right, and has filed a federal lawsuit that his supporters are calling "Roe v. Wade for men." Drafted by the National Center for Men, it contends that as a matter of equal rights, men who don't want a child should be permitted, early in pregnancy, to get "a financial abortion" releasing them from any future responsibility to the baby.

Gee, I wonder what Mr. Pataki (R, NY) finds so embarrassing

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 23, 2006 - 11:09am.
on |

Quote of note:

"I'm not sure any recent governor ever has really acknowledged that we're part of Appalachia, even though it's been that way for decades," said William L. Parment, a Democratic assemblyman from Chautauqua County, in the southwest corner of the state. "It's as if they think we'll all be associated with poor people in the mountains, even though that's clearly not what all of Appalachia is."

After thinking for a moment, Mr. Parment offered a political truism: "I suppose it's all about appearances."

Is Upstate 'Like Appalachia'? Well, Part of It Is Appalachia

By JENNIFER MEDINA

ALBANY, March 22 — A candidate for governor compared upstate New York to Appalachia. The sitting governor called that an insult. Lost in the fracas was a geographical fact: In some places, upstate New York actually is Appalachia.

David Brooks wants to keep hope alive

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 23, 2006 - 10:22am.
on |

Mr. Brooks is dismayed because Republicans have stopped believing their own press.

Republicans seem to have gone from believing that culture is nothing, to believing that culture is everything — from idealism to fatalism in the blink of an eye.

How does that happen? It's only possible if you never really believed in your idealism.

Come on, folks...how do you, idealistically, combine religious fundamentalism with gambling (never mind all those Bingo games in Catholic school cafeterias every Friday)?

European conservatives from Edmund Burke to Michael Oakeshott usefully remind us of the power of culture and tradition. But American conservatives — from Hamilton to Reagan — have never taken that path precisely because they believe in the power of the American creed, precisely because they have an Enlightenment faith in the power of reason to change minds.

This is your great legal intellect?

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 22, 2006 - 10:21pm.
on
I understand you don't like letting a guy go when you caught him with a lap full of cocaine.
Chief Justice Roberts said the result of the majority's conclusion "is a complete lack of practical guidance for the police in the field, let alone for the lower courts."
But this is nonsense. The ruling is crystal clear.
since both marriage partners "had common control and authority" over the premises, the consent of both was needed to conduct a search without a warrant.
It seems the "practical guidance" Justice Roberts wants to provide is "how do we make this stick?"

Obviously Justice Roberts' problem is with the conclusion of the case when the law is passed...the essence of legislating from the bench.

Supreme Court Limits Police Searches of Homes
By DAVID STOUT

WASHINGTON, March 22 — A bitterly split Supreme Court, ruling in a case that arose from a marriage gone bad, today narrowed the circumstances under which the police can enter and search a home without a warrant.

In a 5-to-3 decision, the justices sided with Scott F. Randolph of Americus, Ga., who was charged with cocaine possession in 2001 after his wife, Janet, called the police during a domestic dispute, complained that her husband was using cocaine and then led the officers to a bedroom, where there was evidence of cocaine abuse.

Too late for all those regrets

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 22, 2006 - 7:47pm.
on

According to OpinionJournal, we've already lost the Iraq war. The signs of defeat:

The U.S. would lose all credibility on weapons proliferation. One doesn't have to be a dreamy-eyed optimist about democracy to recognize that toppling Saddam Hussein was a milestone in slowing the spread of WMD. Watching the Saddam example, Libya's Moammar Gadhafi decided he didn't want to be next. Gadhafi's "voluntary" disarmament in turn helped uncover the nuclear network run by Pakistani scientist A.Q. Khan and Iran's two decades of deception.

Now Iran is dangerously close to acquiring nuclear weapons, a prospect that might yet be headed off by the use or threat of force. But if the U.S. retreats from Iraq, Iran's mullahs will know that we have no stomach to confront them and coercive diplomacy will have no credibility. An Iranian bomb, in turn, would inspire nuclear efforts in other Mideast countries and around the world.

Moving considerations back where they belong

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 22, 2006 - 7:40pm.
on |

The problem with mixing programming and politics in your head

...is that when something occurs to you, it often does so in a singularly uncommunicable form.

I've been thinking about Black solidarity on a purely practical level. I'm not even talking about the practical nationalism touted in We Who Are Dark : The Philosophical Foundations of Black Solidarity. Since I assume a low-level nationalism pretty much across the board, I'm thinking more about how to get folks to acknowlege it.

Always quote Bill Moyers

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 22, 2006 - 3:16pm.
on |
Quote of note:

These charlatans and demagogues know that by controlling a society’s most emotionally-laden symbols, they can control America, too. They must be challenged. Davidson Loehr reminds us that holding preachers and politicians to a higher standard than they want to serve has marked the entire history of both religion and politics. It is the conflict between the religion of the priests – ancient and modern – and the religion of the prophets.

It is the vast difference between the religion about Jesus and the religion of Jesus.
A Time for Heresy
Bill Moyers
March 22, 2006

Bill Moyers is President of the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy.  This is the prepared text of his remarks delivered on March 14 upon the establishment by Marilyn and James Dunn, of the Wake Forest Divinity School, of a scholarship in religious freedom in the name of Judith and Bill Moyers.

Oh, so now they're "less educated"

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 22, 2006 - 12:33pm.
on |
I saw the most interesting...thingie, I don't know what you call them, on C-Span. The Center for Immigration Studies has a new paper out: Dropping Out, Immigrant Entry and Native Exit From the Labor Market, 2000-2005, that list a series of complaints that sounds remarkably like what no one gave a damn about when it only affected Black folks.

But now a whole lot of everyone else is on the wrong side of the wealth gap.

They're not shiftless, though. We know who is shiftless. It's the drop-outs that are shiftless, but you... you're just "less educated."

You're sounding awfully defensive, Jack

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 22, 2006 - 7:26am.
on

How Not To Report About Meth
The Washington Post shows the way.
By Jack Shafer
Posted Tuesday, March 21, 2006, at 6:57 PM ET

Start your article with an anecdote, preferably one about a user who testifies about how methamphetamine destroyed his life. Toss out some statistics to indicate that meth use is growing, even if the squishy numbers don't prove anything. Avoid statistics that cut against your case. Use and reuse the words "problem" and "epidemic" without defining them. Quote law enforcement officers extensively, whether they know what they're talking about or not. Avoid drug history except to make inflammatory comparisons between meth and other drugs. Gather grave comments from public-health authorities but never talk to critics of the drug war who might add an unwanted layer of complexity to your story.

They'd probably try to burn her at the stake nowadays

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 22, 2006 - 6:59am.
on |

Kinda of like Condi, but sane.

She arrived with great fanfare as the first black woman to be surgeon general, a sharecropper's daughter who overcame racism and poverty to rise to the top of her field.

WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO . . . JOYCELYN ELDERS?
Wednesday, March 22, 2006; A19

At home in Arkansas, Joycelyn Elders was taking a little breather. The day before she was in Philadelphia, where she talked about fighting AIDS in minority communities. Two days later, she would be in New York, giving a lecture on advancing cultural connections with health concerns. Then, it would be on to Gettysburg, Pa.

Dear Fareed Zakaria: The rule is puff-puff-pass

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 22, 2006 - 6:53am.
on
...which I remind you of because you MUST be high.
Iraq may be stumbling toward nation-building by consent, not brutality. And that is a model for the Middle East.
Why Iraq Is Still Worth the Effort
By Fareed Zakaria
Wednesday, March 22, 2006; Page A21

Three years ago this week, I watched the invasion of Iraq apprehensively. I had supported military intervention to rid the country of Saddam Hussein's tyranny, but I had also been appalled by the crude and unilateral manner in which the Bush administration handled the issue. In the first weeks after the invasion, I was critical of several of the administration's decisions -- crucially, invading with a light force and dismantling the governing structures of Iraq (including the bureaucracy and army). My criticisms grew over the first 18 months of the invasion, a period that offered a depressing display of American weakness and incompetence. And yet, for all my misgivings about the way the administration has handled this policy, I've never been able to join the antiwar crowd. Nor am I convinced that Iraq is a hopeless cause that should be abandoned.