Unfortunately, it seems we can't promote a good idea without gassing up the statistics

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on June 28, 2006 - 1:28pm.
on

What if, instead of focusing exclusively on college, we identified success as the ability to earn a living, support a family, and be a contributing member of society? 

One-size-fits-all doesn't suit our students
By David Crane  |  June 28, 2006

I ATTENDED two high school graduations this month. One was for my own son, and the other was for students at Boston's Josiah Quincy Upper School, a grade 6-12 school that I helped to create seven years ago, and that was graduating its first class. At these ceremonies, teachers, administrators, and guests spoke with pride and excitement about the colleges to which the students had been accepted and from which scholarships will be received.

But what about our ``other" students -- the ones who do not graduate from high school and do not attend or ultimately graduate from college? According to an exhaustive study of the Chicago public school system conducted by the University of Chicago and presented at the Harvard Graduate School of Education last month, such students make up more than 90 percent of our urban public school student body.

According to this study, 46 percent of inner-city ninth graders will not graduate from high school. A third of those who do graduate have a D average. Only 18 percent of those ninth graders will eventually attend either a two-year or four-year degree program; only a third of those, 6.5 percent, will graduate with an associate's or bachelor's degree. For every 100 African-American males who enter ninth grade, only 2.5 will graduate from an institution of higher learning. These numbers become starker when we consider that, according to the study, 79 percent of inner-city high school students report they want to go to college.

Why are we subjecting these students to a one-size-fits-all, college-or-bust ethos and college prep curriculum when so few of our inner-city students either want what we are offering or want it badly enough to put in more than a minimal effort? In doing so, we create a culture in which dropping out is a norm, and we insure that the lion's share of our students leave high school with an indelible sense of failure.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by ConPermiso on June 28, 2006 - 4:11pm.

how did this go from an indictment of pedagogy to an indictment of the students whom the pedagogy has failed?

 if the kids want to go to school, why would you assume that they don't want it or aren't working hard enough because so few of them make it?  Can you PLEASE send this cat the tim wise article?!?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on June 28, 2006 - 6:45pm.

"What if, instead of focusing exclusively on college, we identified success as the ability to earn a living, support a family, and be a contributing member of society? "

That would mean treating and funding vocational education like the Germans and Japanese - which is to say, well - so that students who learn abstract thinking best through physical and spatial exercises would graduate with with highly marketable skills.

This wouldn't help everyone but it would help a significant segment of the population because once you learn a set of skills to a high level, mastering new ones is easier.

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on June 28, 2006 - 7:10pm.
how did this go from an indictment of pedagogy to an indictment of the students whom the pedagogy has failed?

Hence the title of this post.

I hate when a good idea is supported by fucked up reasoning. It's like Nietzche said...sometimes you wind up opposing something because its supporters are so insipid. 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
More information about formatting options