He didn't say Bush wouldn't get impeached. Didn't say he doesn't want Bush impeached. He said there's be no rush because a proper accounting of events is necessary to see if it can be done at all. And to those who are bothered by the prospect, all I can say is, if he hasn't done anything wrong, he has nothing to fear, right?

Right? 

No Rush to Impeachment
By John Conyers Jr.
Thursday, May 18, 2006; A23

As Republicans have become increasingly nervous about whether they will be able to maintain control of the House in the midterm elections, they have resorted to the straw-man strategy of identifying a parade of horrors to come if Democrats gain the majority. Among these is the assertion that I, as the new chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, would immediately begin impeachment proceedings against President Bush.

I will not do that. I readily admit that I have been quite vigorous, if not relentless, in questioning the administration. The allegations I have raised are grave, serious, well known, and based on reliable media reports and the accounts of former administration officials.

But none of these allegations can be proved or disproved until the administration answers questions. For example, to know whether intelligence was mistaken or manipulated in the run-up to the Iraq war, we need to know what information was made available to -- and actually read by -- decision makers and how views contradicting the case for war were treated.