Dammit, another book for the pile...

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on June 19, 2006 - 1:39pm.
on |

[TS] Class War Politics
By PAUL KRUGMAN

So what's our bitter partisan divide really about? In two words: class warfare. That's the lesson of an important new book, "Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches," by Nolan McCarty of Princeton University, Keith Poole of the University of California, San Diego, and Howard Rosenthal of New York University.

"Polarized America" is a technical book written for political scientists. But it's essential reading for anyone who wants to understand what's happening to America.

What the book shows, using a sophisticated analysis of Congressional votes and other data, is that for the past century, political polarization and economic inequality have moved hand in hand. Politics during the Gilded Age, an era of huge income gaps, was a nasty business — as nasty as it is today. The era of bipartisanship, which lasted for roughly a generation after World War II, corresponded to the high tide of America's middle class. That high tide began receding in the late 1970's, as middle-class incomes grew slowly at best while incomes at the top soared; and as income gaps widened, a deep partisan divide re-emerged.

Both the decline of partisanship after World War II and its return in recent decades mainly reflected the changing position of the Republican Party on economic issues.

Before the 1940's, the Republican Party relied financially on the support of a wealthy elite, and most Republican politicians firmly defended that elite's privileges. But the rich became a lot poorer during and after World War II, while the middle class prospered. And many Republicans accommodated themselves to the new situation, accepting the legitimacy and desirability of institutions that helped limit economic inequality, such as a strongly progressive tax system. (The top rate during the Eisenhower years was 91 percent.)

When the elite once again pulled away from the middle class, however, Republicans turned their back on the legacy of Dwight Eisenhower and returned to a focus on the interests of the wealthy. Tax cuts at the top — including repeal of the estate tax — became the party's highest priority.

But if the real source of today's bitter partisanship is a Republican move to the right on economic issues, why have the last three elections been dominated by talk of terrorism, with a bit of religion on the side? Because a party whose economic policies favor a narrow elite needs to focus the public's attention elsewhere. And there's no better way to do that than accusing the other party of being unpatriotic and godless.

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by PoliticalCritic (not verified) on June 19, 2006 - 5:53pm.

It really is just another book for the pile. I'm tired of all these partisan books by people just looking to make a buck.

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on June 19, 2006 - 9:26pm.

If the information is true and one has use for it, who cares why it was written?

Submitted by Temple3 on June 20, 2006 - 7:54am.

"No Republican has ever lost an election by underestimating the intelligence of the American people." Duped into voting against their own economic interests for more than a decade, millions of "We Used to Have a Nest Egg" Americans are teetering on the brink of disaster - but at least they're safe from Al Kader, and er, the uh, men and women who don't want to marry women and men - but er, other men and women. Safety first.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
More information about formatting options