User loginLive Discussions
Most popular threads
Weekly Archives
Blog linksA Skeptical Blog |
Tip jarFor entertainment onlyThe Public LibraryReality checksNews sourcesLink CollectionsDropping KnowledgeLibrary of Congress African American Odyssey Who's new
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 12 guests online.
... |
You must read Erin Aubry Kaplan's every articleSubmitted by Prometheus 6 on May 24, 2006 - 8:22am.
on Race and Identity Seriously. There will be a test later.
I read Erin Aubry Kaplan's
I read Erin Aubry Kaplan's column every week and I'm glad to see that you giving her a plug at your site. I believe that she is largely right about what native blacks and Latino immigrants have in common but an exposition of those commonalities will not prevent or discourage Latinos from filling jobs offered by employers who they know are intentionally discriminating against prospective black employees. This won't happen and these same immigrants will not join ranks with blacks to prevent or penalize these employers. Given the history of this country, I have no reason to be optimistic.
I think coalition, not alliance. Compete completely when our interests conflict, work together then they coincide.
If our interests don't coincide when an employer wants to take bread out of my mouth because of the color of my skin then I have a hard time understanding when and over what our interests might coincide.
They coincide in establishing rules and methods of enforcement. I understand if survival issues override all that. If you've got genuine survival issues, they should...they must. But most of us are in a little better position than that. No, I disagree. Our interests don't coincide in establishing rules and methods of enforcement. In theory they may but not in practice. If Latinos are being given jobs partially as a result of employers being unwilling to hire blacks, why would they sacrifice their spot in the line to stand in solidarity with folks who are unemployed?
How is that the fault of Latinos? why would they sacrifice their spot in the line to stand in solidarity with folks who are unemployed? It that's your criterion, you'll find no coalition partners. How is this the fault of Latinos? Then let me rephrase.
Why does the actions of racist employers make you unable or unwilling to ally with Latinos in unrelated matters? Hoping you don't find the comparison too offensive, but it's a whole lot like the white small farmers that were ruined by slavery and the plantation system blaming the slaves instead of the land owners. I don't find the analogy offensive. We're just trying to make sense here of an extremely complicated problem. I don't find the analogy helpful but I don't find it offensive either. It is not the actions of racist employers alone that poses diffculties in forming alliances or coalitions between Latinos and blacks. It is the actions of racist employers in combination with the predictable response of those who are treated in a less racist (or class biased) way that creates the problem. There has almost never been a time, save for a brief period in California and in New York City begininng in the late 1960s and ending by the late 1970s, when Latinos demonstrated any willingness to join ranks with their black brothers and sisters and fight together for social justice. I never declared that such a coalition or alliance was not a desireable goal. The reality is that it is not attainable in this current political, social and economic environment. The bodies of African Americans form the roadway that others have used to challenge the existing order of things in this country. When I begin to see more than black bodies in that mix I'll shut my mouth and join the other protestors and activists. Until that time though...
I never declared that such a coalition or alliance was not a desireable goal. The reality is that it is not attainable in this current political, social and economic environment.Okay. |
|