Don't look for many updates on this topic from me for a while

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on May 25, 2006 - 11:44am.
on

Representative Jefferson's case is one of those issues I'm going to watch for a while before I say something stupid. On the one hand, folks have gotten away with videotaped crimes before. On the other hand it takes serious balls to claim innocence in the face of a video tape. And ultimately the institutional moves are more important than the specific incident.

Somewhere down in the linked article it says Rep. Pelosi is wary of offending the CBC. I don't see that.

Pelosi move triggers revolt
By Josephine Hearn

Furious black lawmakers, rallying behind Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.), were pulled back from the brink of open revolt against House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in an emergency meeting with her yesterday.

The meeting with a handful of CBC members was called after Pelosi wrote the embattled lawmaker, who is at the center of a massive bribery scandal, a curt note requesting his immediate resignation from the powerful Ways and Means Committee.

Outraged that one of its members was being picked on even though he has not been charged with a crime, the Congressional Black Caucus had intended to issue a defiant statement against their leader but agreed after the meeting to pause, at least briefly, for reflection.

Earlier this week, Pelosi approached Jefferson and told him that she thought he should resign, according to a Democratic aide. Later, at the Democratic caucus meeting yesterday morning, she took him into a side room and told him that she had prepared a letter calling on him to resign the committee seat and that she would allow him one hour to withdraw gracefully before she sent it, according to the aide. In both instances, Jefferson remained defiant.

Pelosi’s one-sentence missive to Jefferson called on him to vacate his committee seat “in the interest of upholding the high ethical standard of the House Democratic Caucus.”

Jefferson promptly refused, calling her request “discriminatory” and “unprecedented,” and suggested that she was employing a double standard by failing to ask other lawmakers facing ethics questions to relinquish their committee assignments. Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-W.Va.) has come under fire for earmarks he secured through his seat on the Appropriations Committee.

“I will not give up a committee assignment that is so vital to New Orleans at this crucial time for any uncertain political strategy,” Jefferson said.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by ptcruiser on May 25, 2006 - 7:50pm.

I understand your reluctance but there is nothing that you could say that would overshadow, IMHO, Rep. Jefferson's sleazy voting record and the videotape. Do you recall Rep. Jefferson commandeering members of the National Guard during the Katrina crisis so that he could personally remove some items from his house? Given the recent revelations about the contents of his freezer, I wonder why he was so concerned about retrieving items from his home when his constituents were suffering in such a terrible way. 

Nancy Pelosi and Jefferson are opposite sides of the same coin. 

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on May 25, 2006 - 9:37pm.

Jefferson only has to overcome the videotape.

I knew nothing about Jefferson before this. I'm not impressed with what I found, couldn't care less if he goes to jail.

Now I'm thinking of the politics that's taking place around it. That story up there isn't the first about CBC beefs where everyone involved is sworn to silence somehow. 

Submitted by Ourstorian on May 26, 2006 - 2:06pm.

The CBC demonstrates once again its irrelevancy. No agenda, no leadership, the best they can do is circle wagons to protect the scumbags among them. With incumbency being what it is, and the intractable nature of the incompetency and corruption of the current officeholders, it will take nothing less than a revolution to rid ourselves of these hacks.