Submitted by Prometheus 6 on May 26, 2006 - 11:31am.
Is this satire?
Bovens calculates that, if the rhythm method is 90% effective, and if conceptions outside the fertile period are about twice as likely to fail as to survive, then “millions of rhythm method cycles per year globally depend for their success on massive embryonic death”.
This is deeper than the pre-pregnant thing . Who thinks this crap up?
Rhythm method criticised as a killer of embryos
Alison Motluk
The range of birth control choices may have become narrower for couples that believe the sanctity of life begins when sperm meets egg. The rhythm method, a philosopher claims, may compromise millions of embryos.
“Even a policy of practising condom usage and having an abortion in case of failure would cause less embryonic deaths than the rhythm method,” writes Luc Bovens, of the London School of Economics, in the Journal of Medical Ethics.
With other methods of contraception banned by the Catholic church, the rhythm method has been one of the few options available to millions.
In using the rhythm method, couples avoid pregnancy by refraining from sex during a woman’s fertile period. Perfect adherents claim it is over 90% effective – i.e. one couple in 10 will conceive in an average year. But, typically speaking, effectiveness is estimated at closer to 75%.
Now Bovens suggests that for those concerned about embryo loss, the rhythm method may be a bad idea. He argues that, because couples are having sex on the fringes of the fertile period, they are more likely to conceive embryos that are incapable of surviving.
Fertile window
As many as 50% of conceptions may not survive long enough even to disrupt menstruation, Bovens says. It is reasonable to assume then, he adds, that embryos created from sperm that has been sitting for days within the female's reproductive tract before ovulation may be disadvantaged.
The situation is similar, he suggests, for eggs that have been waiting around for sperm to arrive. These are the only two likely scenarios where fertilisation might occur using the rhythm method, he points out.
These embryos may then face a less-than-ideal uterine lining, he points out, since the uterus is not as receptive outside of the most fertile period.
I learned about the rhythm method in a theology class as a requirement for graduation from college. I was hardly impressed because the doctor who came to our class to talk about it had 13 kids.
However, I'm not sure this person is seeking ways to save these embryos. I think they may be supporting a good reason for contraception - if, that is, saving embryos is the issue. It's funny that this article pops up on the blogsphere (the feminist sites are all over it) the same week that the link to this "How Pregnancy Happens" video reappears . It tends to support the article.
Some grown folks I know should take a gander at that video because I know some folks with some stupid assumptions making stupid mistakes.