I found an excuse to list some principles

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on October 11, 2006 - 1:09pm.
on |

Scared to be seen reading The Black Commentator at work? Check out the Black Agenda Report.

This issue the Black Commentator added a bag for folks to their staff, and a couple of them have the Black Radical Congress listed in their bonafides. I had run by the BRC site a couple of days ago; sort of curious because I used to hear from them regularly; I just don't run in those circles nowadays.

The BRC mission is like mine on steroids; Their principles are right in line with my own views, with minor exceptions.

The Black Radical Congress does not intend to replace or displace existing organizations, parties or campaigns but will contribute to mobilizing unaffiliated individuals, as well as organizations, around common concerns.

  1. We recognize the diverse historical tendencies in the Black radical tradition including revolutionary nationalism, feminism and socialism.
  2. The technological revolution and capitalist globalization have changed the economy, labor force and class formations that need to inform our analysis and strategies. The increased class polarization created by these developments demands that we, as Black radicals, ally ourselves with the most oppressed sectors of our communities and society.
  3. Gender and sexuality can no longer be viewed solely as personal issues but must be a basic part of our analyses, politics and struggles.
  4. We reject racial and biological determinism, Black patriarchy and Black capitalism as solutions to problems facing Black people.
  5. We must see the struggle in global terms.
  6. We need to meet people where they are, taking seriously identity politics and single issue reform groups, at the same time that we push for a larger vision that links these struggles.
  7. We must be democratic and inclusive in our dealings with one another, making room for constructive criticism and honest dissent within our ranks. There must be open venues for civil and comradely debates to occur.
  8. Our discussions should be informed not only by a critique of what now exists, but by serious efforts to forge a creative vision of a new society.
  9. We cannot limit ourselves to electoral politics — we must identify multiple sites of struggles.
  10. We must overcome divisions within the Black radical forces, such as those of generation, region, and occupation. We must forge a common language that is accessible and relevant.
  11. Black radicals must build a national congress of radical forces in the Black community to strengthen radicalism as the legitimate voice of Black working and poor people, and to build organized resistance.

In fact, depending on what "Black Capitalism" means, we may hove no differences in principle at all.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by kspence on October 11, 2006 - 6:37pm.

This was drafted around the same time as the MMM.  In fact, the BRC in some ways was a response to it.  What I felt then after reading the BRC is what I feel now---that 10th principle was the most important to them.  The manifesto basically presaged a gang-war with black radicals on the one hand and black nationalists on the other.  My politics are much closer to the BRC than to the MMM but we don't need anymore set-claiming. 

The reason why you haven't heard anything from them is the same reason you haven't heard anything from ANY MMM organizing committee.

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on October 11, 2006 - 7:11pm.
The manifesto basically presaged a gang-war with black radicals on the one hand and black nationalists on the other.

One reason I never really got with the BRC is a report I got from a friend of mine. She suggested they NOT pencil themselves into the leadership positions of their new society. The suggestion didn't go over well.

My politics are much closer to the BRC than to the MMM but we don't need anymore set-claiming.
Truly. It's why I think the model should be teacher rather than leader, and our central institutions should be educational rather than religious. The teacher model assumes you let people go, that you're making no decisions for anyone outside of maybe what they need to learn. And it doesn't prevent anyone from learning anything else they choose.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
More information about formatting options