The Environment

But on the positive side

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on May 23, 2006 - 8:51am.
on

...excess greenhouse gasses are our friends

Earth-solar cycle spurs greenhouse gases -studies
Mon May 22, 2006 03:29 PM ET
By Deborah Zabarenko

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Greenhouse gases are known to spur global warming, but scientists said on Monday that global warming in turn spurs greenhouse gas emissions -- which means Earth could get hotter faster than climate models predict.

Two scientific teams, one in Europe and another in California, reached the same basic conclusion: when Earth has warmed up in the past, due to the sun's natural cycles, more greenhouse gases have been spewed into the atmosphere.

In case you thought catastrophic climate change was a bad thing

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on May 18, 2006 - 9:24pm.
on

CO2: We Call it Life



The Competitive Enterprise Institute has produced two 60-second television spots focusing on the alleged global warming crisis and the calls by some environmental groups and politicians for reduced energy use. The ads are airing in 14 U.S. cities from May 18 to May 28, 2006.


"Energy"
Windows Media: Hi - Low
Quicktime: Hi - Low


"Glaciers"
Windows Media: Hi - Low

You wouldn't want corn to suffer what happened to European royalty, would you?

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on May 16, 2006 - 10:19am.
on

Maize in global gene bank crisis
15 May 2006
From New Scientist Print Edition.

WITH the future of bananas in the balance (see "A future without bananas?"), there's more worrying news for another major food resource. Maize, the world's most widely grown crop, is facing its own genetic meltdown

The world's crop gene banks are in crisis, a meeting of maize researchers and organisations in Texcoco, Mexico, was told last week. At least half the seed stocks are unable to germinate because of incorrect storage, with potentially dire consequences for the world's food supply.

They even said it with a straight face

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on May 2, 2006 - 10:33pm.
on

Federal Study Finds Accord on Warming
By ANDREW C. REVKIN

A scientific study commissioned by the Bush administration concluded yesterday that the lower atmosphere was indeed growing warmer and that there was "clear evidence of human influences on the climate system."

The finding eliminates a significant area of uncertainty in the debate over global warming, one that the administration has long cited as a rationale for proceeding cautiously on what it says would be costly limits on emissions of heat-trapping gases.

But White House officials noted that this was just the first of 21 assessments planned by the federal Climate Change Science Program, which was created by the administration in 2002 to address what it called unresolved questions. The officials said that while the new finding was important, the administration's policy remained focused on studying the remaining questions and using voluntary means to slow the growth in emissions of heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide.

A human with the morals of a corporation would be a psychopath

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on April 17, 2006 - 7:36am.
on

Paul Krugman excoriates Exxon Mobil on moral, rather than economic, grounds. I've quoted more extensively than I normally would from a pay-to-access article.

To understand why Exxon Mobil is a worse environmental villain than other big oil companies, you need to know a bit about how the science and politics of climate change have shifted over the years.

Global warming emerged as a major public issue in the late 1980's. But at first there was considerable scientific uncertainty.

Over time, the accumulation of evidence removed much of that uncertainty. Climate experts still aren't sure how much hotter the world will get, and how fast. But there's now an overwhelming scientific consensus that the world is getting warmer, and that human activity is the cause. In 2004, an article in the journal Science that surveyed 928 papers on climate change published in peer-reviewed scientific journals found that "none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position."

At least someone cares enough to ask

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on April 5, 2006 - 11:58am.
on

Quote of note:

The meeting was solidly informative and inspirational; I expect that we at SciAm will be drawing from what we learned there for a variety of articles down the road. Best of all, for the sake of anyone interested in this topic who was not among the 1,600 audience members, the entire proceedings are being archived here, including podcasts of all the speakers and discussion sessions. Reporters from Earth & Sky also covered the event and interviewed many of the speakers.

Is Sustainable Development Feasible?

At the risk of sounding avaricious, sustainable development is a principle for cultivating prosperity today without diminishing the prospects for cultivating still more tomorrow. It recognizes that the environment provides a variety of resources and services that are essential to both individuals and economies. If we want sustained wealth and health, we need to avoid undermining the environment we depend on. It's a strategy that ideally allows having both.

Post time for the four horsemen

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on April 3, 2006 - 6:53pm.
on

Quote of note:

"Though I agree that conservation biology is of utmost importance to the world, I do not think that preaching that 90 percent of the human population should die of Ebola is the most effective means of encouraging conservation awareness."

UT professor says death is imminent
By Jamie Mobley
The Gazette-Enterprise
Published April 2, 2006

AUSTIN - A University of Texas professor says the Earth would be better off with 90 percent of the human population dead.

"Every one of you who gets to survive has to bury nine," Eric Pianka cautioned students and guests at St. Edward's University on Friday. Pianka's words are part of what he calls his "doomsday talk" - a 45-minute presentation outlining humanity's ecological misdeeds and Pianka's predictions about how nature, or perhaps humans themselves, will exterminate all but a fraction of civilization.

George Bush tries to let more arsenic in your water again

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on April 1, 2006 - 8:50am.
on

Quote of note:

The question of how to regulate drinking water quality has roiled Washington for years. Just before leaving office, President Bill Clinton imposed a more stringent standard for arsenic, dictating that drinking water should contain no more than 10 parts per billion of the poison, which in small amounts is a known carcinogen. President Bush suspended the standard after taking office, but Congress voted to reinstate it, and in 2001, the National Academy of Sciences issued a study saying arsenic was more dangerous than the EPA had previously believed. The deadline for water systems to comply with the arsenic rule was January of this year.

EPA May Weaken Rule on Water Quality
Plan Would Affect Towns That Find Complying Costly
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, April 1, 2006; A04

Nothing left to sell, I guess

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on March 11, 2006 - 12:33pm.
on |

Future lobbyist:

Norton won plaudits from business leaders but earned the enmity of many environmentalists during her often contentious five-year tenure. She said she has no immediate plans but expects to work in the private sector and spend more time in the West.

...Rodger Schlickeisen, president of the advocacy group Defenders of Wildlife, issued a terse news release on learning of Norton's departure: "Good riddance."

Norton to End 5-Year Tenure at Interior
Secretary Says Resignation Is Unrelated to Probe of Abramoff's Ties to Department

By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 11, 2006; A02

A message from my Chaos Lord persona

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on February 20, 2006 - 9:50am.
on
We haven't stopped your human foolishness for a simple reason: the Earth, the planet, is a giant ball of iron and you, collectively are a thin film of hydrocarbon chemistry that accrued on its surface as it travelled through the infinite. You can do no lasting damage to the planet.

You can hurt yourselves pretty bad, but we really don't care about that.

Quote of note:

Wetlands are nurseries for creatures at the bottom of many food chains, filters that keep some nutrients and pollutants out of streams, and buffers against flooding.

If the court interpreted the Clean Water Act as controlling only actually navigable waterways and their immediate tributaries and adjacent wetlands, "then discharges of such materials as sewage, toxic chemicals and medical waste into those tributaries would not be subject" to regulation under the law, the solicitor general, Paul D. Clement, wrote in the government's brief.

Reach of Clean Water Act Is at Issue in 2 Supreme Court Cases
By FELICITY BARRINGER

Global warming hasn't abated, by the way

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on February 17, 2006 - 12:18pm.
on

Greenland's Glaciers: Melting and On The Move

The glaciers in southern Greenland are melting and moving. In fact, Kangerdlugssuaq Glacier went from standing still in 1996 to flowing at a rate of 14 kilometers a year by 2005, making it one of the fastest moving glaciers in the world. According to a new study, all of Greenland's coastal glaciers are already experiencing or may soon experience such speedups, meaning that Greenland's ice will contribute even more than expected to the world's rising seas.
"It takes a long time to build and melt an ice sheet, but glaciers can react quickly to temperature changes," notes Eric Rignot, a glaciologist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. "Greenland is probably going to contribute more and faster to sea level rise than predicted by current models."

Let's see how deep into the Greek alphabet we get this year

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on February 3, 2006 - 1:25pm.
on

And hey...why not see if anyone in the Bush regime learned anything.

La Niña warms winter, bodes ill for hurricanes
By MIKE TONER
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 02/03/06<

A new La Niña, a cooling of the ocean surface that can have global consequences — from the promise of a warmer, drier spring in Georgia to a new wild card in what forecasters already expect will be a hyperactive hurricane season — has emerged in the Pacific, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported Thursday.

Past cooling episodes in the same area of the central Pacific have been linked to increases in the number and intensity of hurricanes, but climate experts say it's too early to tell what role this La Niña will play in the 2006 hurricane season, already expected to be more active.

I don't think I need to comment

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on December 22, 2005 - 10:35am.
on

Quote of note:

The scientists, who work for government agencies in Britain and the United States, made the finding after adding satellite-based measurements of haze to computer models estimating the consequences of industrial emissions of aerosols, or airborne particles.

Pollution May Slow Warming; Cleaner Air May Speed It, Study Says
By BLOOMBERG NEWS

Pollution may be slowing global warming, researchers are reporting today, and a cleaner environment may soon speed it up.

Writing in the journal Nature, an international scientific team provides evidence suggesting that a reduction in haze from human causes may accelerate warming of the earth's atmosphere. The researchers said pollutants had held down the rate of global warming by absorbing and scattering sunlight.

Scientist now have evidence that balls regenerate

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on December 21, 2005 - 6:56pm.
on |

Senate rejects drilling in Alaska wildlife refuge
Republicans fail to garner enough support to avoid threat of filibuster
The Associated Press
Updated: 2:41 p.m. ET Dec. 21, 2005

WASHINGTON - The Senate blocked oil drilling in an Alaska wildlife refuge Wednesday, rejecting a must-pass defense spending bill where supporters positioned the quarter-century-old environmental issue to garner broader support.

Drilling backers fell four votes short of getting the required 60 votes to avoid a threatened filibuster of the defense measure over the oil drilling issue. Senate leaders were expected to withdraw the legislation so it could be reworked without the refuge language. The vote was 56-44.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those who for procedural reasons cast a “no” vote, so that he could bring the drilling issue up for another vote.

Hey, who needs nature anyway?

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on December 15, 2005 - 10:22am.
on

Quote of note:

At such times, it's worth remembering the Park Service's mission statement: "The National Park Service preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the national park system for the enjoyment, education and inspiration of this and future generations. The Park Service cooperates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world."

Nothing in there about mining or giving whole islands over to the military.

Land grab
December 15, 2005

SUDDENLY IT'S OPEN SEASON on our national parks. Not on the animals, though the Interior Department did move last month to take the Yellowstone grizzly off the endangered species list. It's open season on the parks themselves.

What's the point then?

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on December 11, 2005 - 10:27am.
on |

U.S. Won't Join in Binding Climate Talks
Administration Agrees to Separate Dialogue
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 11, 2005; Page A01

MONTREAL, Dec. 10 -- Despite the Bush administration's adamant resistance, nearly every industrialized nation agreed early Saturday to engage in talks aimed at producing a new set of binding limits on greenhouse gas emissions that would take effect beginning in 2012.

In a separate accord, a broader coalition of nearly 200 nations -- including the United States -- agreed to a much more modest "open and nonbinding" dialogue that would not lead to any "new commitments" to reduce carbon dioxide emissions associated with climate change.

It's enough to convince you there's life on other planets

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on December 2, 2005 - 8:55am.
on

These guys MUST have another planet they're ready to relocate tp.

EPA Seeks to Cut Toxics Reporting — Move Endangers Public Health
Analysis: Nearly 1,000 Communities Across U.S. Would Lose All Toxics Information
Updated December 1, 2005

The latest: NET hosted a press briefing today on EPA's proposed TRI changes. Listen to the briefing [mp3, 4.56 megs], or see the list of participants.

Background: The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed changes to the Toxics Release Inventory reporting thresholds that will affect communities throughout the U.S. As many as 10 percent of communities that currently have a facility reporting to TRI could lose all reported data under the proposal. Read a fact sheet about TRI and the proposed changes or our press release. The proposed cuts pose a risk to communities and to first responders such as police and firefighters.

Those greenhouse gases are no problem though.

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on November 28, 2005 - 9:08pm.
on

Ice Core Extends Climate Record Back 650,000 Years
 
Researchers have recovered a nearly two-mile-long cylinder of ice from eastern Antarctica that contains a record of atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane--two potent and ubiquitous greenhouse gases--spanning the last two glacial periods. Analysis of this core shows that current atmospheric concentrations of CO2--380 parts per million (PPM)--are 27 percent higher than the highest levels found in the last 650,000 years.

The ice core data also shows that CO2 and methane levels have been remarkably stable in Antarctica--varying between 300 PPM and 180 PPM--over that entire period and that shifts in levels of these gases took at least 800 years, compared to the roughly 100 years in which humans have increased atmospheric CO2 levels to their present high. "We have added another piece of information showing that the timescales on which humans have changed the composition of the atmosphere are extremely short compared to the natural time cycles of the climate system," says Thomas Stocker of the University of Bern in Switzerland, who led the research.

No global climate change here, move along, nothing to see...

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on October 13, 2005 - 8:37am.
on

The dispute:

Many climatologists, along with policymakers in a number of countries, believe the rapid temperature rise over the past 50 years is heavily driven by the burning of fossil fuels and other human activities that have spewed carbon dioxide and other "greenhouse gases" into the atmosphere. A vocal minority of scientists say the warming climate is the result of a natural cycle.

The evidence for climate change:

Global temperatures this year are about 1.36 degrees Fahrenheit (0.75 Celsius) above the average between 1950 and 1980, according to the Goddard analysis. Worldwide temperatures in 1998 were 1.28 degrees Fahrenheit (0.71 Celsius) above that 30-year average. The data show that Earth is warming more in the Northern Hemisphere, where the average 2005 temperature was two-tenths of a degree above the 1998 level.

Climate experts say such seemingly small shifts are significant because they involve average readings based on measurements taken at thousands of sites. To put it in perspective, the planet's temperature rose by just 1 to 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit over the past century.

The evidence this 50 year increase (which is a longer time frame than any climate cycle I'm aware of) is a cyclic change:

one skeptic, state climatologist George Taylor of Oregon, said it is difficult to determine an accurate global average temperature, especially since there are not enough stations recording ocean temperatures.

"I just don't trust it," Taylor said of the new calculation, noting that Goddard's findings are "mighty preliminary."

World Temperatures Keep Rising With a Hot 2005
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 13, 2005; A01

Making sense of the US position on global warming

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on October 10, 2005 - 5:12am.
on |

I should have realized this long ago. 

Quote of note:

Last year, scientists found tantalizing hints of oil in seabed samples just 200 miles from the North Pole. All told, one quarter of the world's undiscovered oil and gas resources lies in the Arctic, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The polar thaw is also starting to unlock other treasures: lucrative shipping routes, perhaps even the storied Northwest Passage; new cruise ship destinations; and important commercial fisheries.

As Polar Ice Turns to Water, Dreams of Treasure Abound
By CLIFFORD KRAUSS, STEVEN LEE MYERS, ANDREW C. REVKIN and SIMON ROMERO

If you were halal or kosher you wouldn't have had the problem

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on October 5, 2005 - 6:46pm.
on

Climate change linked to cruise ship illness outbreaks
Wed Oct 5, 2005 06:24 PM ET
By Gene Emery

BOSTON (Reuters) - Warming ocean waters may have tainted Alaskan oysters with a bacteria that triggered four outbreaks of illness on a cruise ship among people who ate the shellfish raw, researchers reported on Wednesday.

"The rising temperatures of ocean water seem to have contributed to one of the largest known outbreaks of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the United States," said Joseph McLaughlin of the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, referring to the bacterium responsible for outbreak.

More low(er) impact technology we could have had yesterday

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on September 26, 2005 - 7:41am.
on | |

Small networks of power generators in "microgrids" could transform the electricity network in the way that the net changed distributed communication.

That is one of the conclusions of a Southampton University project scoping out the feasibility of microgrids for power generation and distribution.

Microgrids are small community networks that supply electricity and heat.

They could make substantial savings, and emissions cuts with no major changes to lifestyles, researchers say.

America in a nutshell

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on September 25, 2005 - 7:54am.
on | | |

It really is. We finally implement a technology that can lighten our planetary footprint, which was obviously just laying around the place. Do we adopt it because it's better for our long-term prospects?

Americans will never accept them if they remain small, meek vehicles like the Toyota Prius or the Honda Insight, which have low top speeds and lackluster pulling power. No, if hybrids are going to appeal to red-meat drivers across the country, they'll need power and performance. "We've got to produce a car that gets a 14-year-old boy excited," Burns said, flashing a bucktoothed grin as he sweated beneath the sun in a loud Hawaiian shirt. "We got to have the smoking! The squealing! The tires popping off!"

We implement it when it becomes necessary to support our specific desires. Not a  moment before.

Anyway... 

The High-Performance Hybrids
By CLIVE THOMPSON

Here go another guy without a job

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on September 12, 2005 - 5:16pm.
on | |

Quote of note:

Few people are better qualified to judge the extent of the problem. Mr Kaufman, who has been with the EPA since it was founded 35 years ago, helped to set up its hazardous waste programme. After serving as chief investigator to the EPA's ombudsman, he is now senior policy analyst in its Office of Solid Wastes and Emergency Response. He said the clean-up needed to be "the most massive public works exercise ever done", adding: "It will take 10 years to get everything up and running and safe."

Cover-up: toxic waters 'will make New Orleans unsafe for a decade'
By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Correspondent
Published: 11 September 2005

They're actually making the crime into the new law

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on August 31, 2005 - 2:27pm.
on |

Quote of note:

The draft rules...contradict the position taken by federal lawyers who have prosecuted polluting facilities in the past, and parallel the industry's line of defense against those suits. 

...In court filings, the EPA estimated in 2002 that an hourly standard would allow eight plants in five states -- including Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia -- to generate legally as much as 100,000 tons a year of pollutants that would be illegal under the existing New Source Review rule. That equals about a third of their total emissions.

New Rules Could Allow Power Plants to Pollute More
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 31, 2005; Page A01

Watch for the promise to cut all funding if the UN doesn't agree to these terms

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on August 25, 2005 - 7:19am.
on | | |

Why do you think Bolton's abrasiveness was so important? 

U.S. Wants Changes In U.N. Agreement
By Colum Lynch
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, August 25, 2005; Page A01

UNITED NATIONS, Aug. 24 -- Less than a month before world leaders arrive in New York for a world summit on poverty and U.N. reform, the Bush administration has thrown the proceedings in turmoil with a call for drastic renegotiation of a draft agreement to be signed by presidents and prime ministers attending the event.

The United States has only recently introduced more than 750 amendments that would eliminate new pledges of foreign aid to impoverished nations, scrap provisions that call for action to halt climate change and urge nuclear powers to make greater progress in dismantling their nuclear arms. At the same time, the administration is urging members of the United Nations to strengthen language in the 29-page document that would underscore the importance of taking tougher action against terrorism, promoting human rights and democracy, and halting the spread of the world's deadliest weapons.

Okay, this is why I went to the Scientific American web site

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on August 23, 2005 - 1:13pm.
on | | | | | | | |

I'm suggesting this month's issue of of Scientific American be read, cover to cover, by everyone. It's a single theme issue, titled Crossroads for Planet Earth. It's the best description of the upcoming bottleneck I've seen for informing mainstream types. Complete and detailed.

Here's the introduction to the issue. Seriously, go buy it.

The Climax of Humanity
Demographically and economically, our era is unique in human history. Depending on how we manage the next few decades, we could usher in environmental sustainability--or collapse
By George Musser

The 21st century feels like a letdown. We were promised flying cars, space colonies and 15-hour workweeks. Robots were supposed to do our chores, except when they were organizing rebellions; children were supposed to learn about disease from history books; portable fusion reactors were supposed to be on sale at the Home Depot. Even dystopian visions of the future predicted leaps of technology and social organization that leave our era in the dust.

Looking beyond the blinking lights and whirring gizmos, though, the new century is shaping up as one of the most amazing periods in human history. Three great transitions set in motion by the Industrial Revolution are reaching their culmination. After several centuries of faster-than-exponential growth, the world's population is stabilizing. Judging from current trends, it will plateau at around nine billion people toward the middle of this century. Meanwhile extreme poverty is receding both as a percentage of population and in absolute numbers. If China and India continue to follow in the economic footsteps of Japan and South Korea, by 2050 the average Chinese will be as rich as the average Swiss is today; the average Indian, as rich as today's Israeli. As humanity grows in size and wealth, however, it increasingly presses against the limits of the planet. Already we pump out carbon dioxide three times as fast as the oceans and land can absorb it; midcentury is when climatologists think global warming will really begin to bite. At the rate things are going, the world's forests and fisheries will be exhausted even sooner.

These three concurrent, intertwined transitions--demographic, economic, environmental--are what historians of the future will remember when they look back on our age. They are transforming everything from geopolitics to the structure of families. And they pose problems on a scale that humans have little experience with. As Harvard University biologist E. O. Wilson puts it, we are about to pass through "the bottleneck," a period of maximum stress on natural resources and human ingenuity.

This broke through the fog and got my attention

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on August 22, 2005 - 11:07am.
on

Quote of note:

Red tide sucks oxygen out of the water, suffocating sea life, and contains poisons that impair the nerves. Eighty-one lumbering sea turtles have been killed by red tide in less than three months, a fourfold increase over the usual amount, and another eight are gravely ill. Last week, the algae bloom was blamed for a newly discovered ''dead zone'' off Tampa that extends along 2,000 square miles of ocean floor, a soupy underwater graveyard the size of Delaware filled with dead sponges, sand dollars and reefs.

Virulent algae creates red tide of death
A virulent algae bloom is laying waste to huge expanses of the Gulf. Scientists are split on why it's so severe.

This is not a post on global climate change

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on August 20, 2005 - 7:58am.
on

Quote of note:

Reefs nearest populated areas, such as the Florida Keys, are under increasing stress, researchers found, whereas more remote areas, including the northwestern Hawaiian Islands, are doing better.

NOAA Cites Threats to U.S., Pacific Coral Reefs
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, August 19, 2005; Page A11

Coral reefs in U.S. waters and the Pacific are under stress from both humans and nature, according to a national assessment released yesterday by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

A combination of overfishing, pollution, disease and climate change is threatening the health of coral reefs everywhere from the Florida Keys to Palau, said the report, which covers 14 areas in the United States and its territories.

Why, so we can drive them to extinction more efficiently?

Submitted by Prometheus 6 on August 18, 2005 - 10:59pm.
on

Obviously someone needed something to talk about and just came up with this nonsense. We can't keep the animals we have alive.

Anyway... 

Lions and elephants on the Great Plains?
Scientists suggest relocating African species to North America

DENVER, Colorado (AP) -- If a group of prominent ecologists have their way, lions and elephants could someday be roaming the Great Plains of North America.

The idea of transplanting African wildlife to this continent is being greeted with gasps and groans from other scientists and conservationists who recall previous efforts to relocate foreign species halfway around the world, often with disastrous results.

But the proposal's supporters say it could help save some species from extinction in Africa, where protection is spotty and habitats are vanishing. They say the relocated animals could also restore the biodiversity in North America to a condition closer to what it was before humans overran the landscape more than 10,000 years ago.

Syndicate content